CKEditor 3.0, formerly known as FCKEditor, released (WYSIWYG editor)

http://ckeditor.com/blog/CKEditor_3.0_is_here

by slater • 17 years ago

44 29 17 years ago

ckeditor.com

revorad2• 17 years ago

Wow, they claim to have had more than 3.5 million downloads since 2003. I have never even heard of this editor before.

Does anyone here use it?

joshsharp• 17 years ago

Used it for ages, it worked better than TinyMCE back in the early days (though I think they're probably equal now.)

Interestingly, I swear FCK was the creator's initials - I wonder if the app's name change is a reflection of a name change on his behalf? ;)

davecardwell• 17 years ago

There is a “notes on the new name” section on the linked article:

“For years we have been fighting with a relatively important issue with FCKeditor. While its quality has been strongly accepted, its name brought us troubles, mainly inside English speaking countries. The fact is that the initials of Frederico Caldeira Knabben have an unfortunate match with the most used English bad word.”

vivekamn• 17 years ago

Yes, we do at www.bharatmoms.com and of all the rich text editors(js based) we tried, this worked out to be the best.

revorad2• 17 years ago

Wow, you run an online community for mothers in India? Very interesting stuff. Didn't expect such a thing to exist. How's the site coming along?

slater• 17 years ago

It's fairly popular as a "drop-in" wysiwyg editor in custom-made CMSes, afaik.

wlievens• 17 years ago

I used it in a website for a customer.

whalesalad• 17 years ago

It used to be called FCKEditor, which is used on a lot of big sites such as pbworks.com (which was also formerly known as pbwiki)

Ras_• 17 years ago

Well, it's been available for quite some time as a MediaWiki (also dokuwiki etc.) plugin, so I don't doubt those numbers.

pbhj• 17 years ago

http://www.google.co.uk/trends?q=(ckeditor|fckeditor)%2Ctiny...

prawn• 17 years ago

Yeah, we use it on a fair few client sites. Works pretty well but sometimes struggles a bit with pasted Word content (but most things do).

GiraffeNecktie• 17 years ago

I'm very pleased with the accessibility improvements. Not just because it's the right thing to do, but it means that building interactive sites where accessibility is a project requirement will be a lot easier.

jdbeast00• 17 years ago

fckeditor code was such a pain to explore, hopefully this complete rewrite solves those problems. we use it over tinymce at work because of the free upload addons.

dabeeeenster• 17 years ago

The paste form Word feature is still woefully poor. The only editor I know that does this well is XStandard, which is a browser plugin and not free.

Anyone know if this is something the CKEditor team are working on?

RyanMcGreal• 17 years ago

Is the problem related to cp1252-to-utf8 conversion issues?

trezor• 17 years ago

As far as I know codepages is all about the browser (usually handles this well) and server-side solution (your milage may vary). When it comes to problems with (F)CKEditor, my problem in this particular case is usually the markup.

The markup from Word may be "slightly" mangled and all, but you need massive amounts of server-side code to clean it up and it just feels so unnecessary when it actually renders fine in the editor client-side.

Small but very annoying bug. In the end I switched to the YUI rich-text editor and it seems to be working better.

mlLK• 17 years ago

I thought this editor looked familiar, my University (IU & IUPUI) has been using the same 'FCKEditor' for 5+ years now; nevertheless, it serves as our WYSIWYG editor for sending messages back and forth via our University's version of Sakai's (http://sakaiproject.org/portal) messaging system, I couldn't tell you how many times my session has timed out costing me a couple paragraphs of my time o_O

Sloppily implemented (http://imgur.com/uarQy.jpg), <french-accent>No</french-accent>?

pilif• 17 years ago

while I agree that F?CKedit is a lot of baggage and not very friendly to program against, the timing out sessions are a problem of the guys that implemented your messaging system and not a problem of CKedit.

philfreo• 17 years ago

And if you use ExpressionEngine (a very popular CMS), there's a new plugin for it: http://brandon-kelly.com/wygwam

mrfish• 17 years ago

I used to curse FCKEditor because it was so slow and unweildy for ajax apps. Creating and destroying and then customizing was a pain. Not many WYSIWYG editors really do these nicely. They all seem to be made to work in a static load once html page. Now CKEditor says you can do all that so I'm very excited. If it is fast, can create and destroy with ease and plays well with jquery then it's my new favorite editor!

c3o• 17 years ago

Thanks in advance for reporting back here whether it lives up to these promises once you've tried it :P

dpnewman• 17 years ago

Looks hopefully like a great rewrite. FCK = Definitely a major player in the wysiwyg scene for long years. I have fingers x-ed on this being the step that resolves the search. Finding a wysiwig that is not bloated and overly complex, bug-free and has the essentials, has occupied me for years. The one thing CK clearly swung and missed in their demo though is the seeming thrill they express about being "colorful". The defaults for modal dialog buttons: bright orange, yellow and green!! CKEditor, you could not have done anything more to suggest you were somehow ignoring or out of touch with the evolution of web UI than this. Now I know that this is all css customizable. Great. I look forward to altering those. But really, if you can show us a web site with good design that uses flaring colors in a text editor UI, I will be stunned. Anyway, sorry for the rant... thrilled that you have moved this forward and can't wait to try. I hope though that you quickly iterate the defaults and the demo on the site to be in line with the notion that UI widgets should not scream for attention, but emphasize the clean and functional.

brandonkelly• 17 years ago

Haha, definitely agree with this. I took some time to override much of the Kama skin's CSS (including the dialogs) for Wygwam. Ended up with something much more clean: http://brandon-kelly.com/fieldframe/showcase

oink• 17 years ago

Now with 90% fewer snickers.

Keyframe• 17 years ago

It would be useful to have a simple editor like TinyMCE but with image browsing/uploading plugin that doesn't just provide you with a file system interface. Instead it would be more useful, IMO, to have a database backend powered images table that you can search through via autocomplete/tags that you can give to each image when uploading it. It would also be useful to have a module in that plugin to search flickr and other services images for CC friendly images that you can transfer to your site easily - retaining all the authors info (to be displayed next to an image).

Actually I have this in my TODO list somewhere down the road.

rudd• 17 years ago

Thank god they changed the name. This is truly a great editor and I've seen it used many times, but I always felt uneasy saying it out loud or even typing it to someone who had never heard of it. It's just awkward. The new name has no (blatant) bad connotations.

lleger• 17 years ago

Too bad it still sucks. It's such a pain to implement.

thras• 17 years ago

One of our users had dropped this into their web structure years ago, never updated it, and had their account nicely owned due to a years-old vulnerability.

CKEditor 3.0, formerly known as FCKEditor, released (WYSIWYG editor)

Related Stories