Eclipse 4.4, Luna, released

http://eclipse.org/org/press-release/20140625_luna_release_train.php

by Eduard • 12 years ago

86 49 12 years ago

eclipse.org

caniszczyk2• 12 years ago

The EGit/JGit teams also shipped an update for Luna

What's new: http://wiki.eclipse.org/JGit/New_and_Noteworthy/3.4 http://wiki.eclipse.org/EGit/New_and_Noteworthy/3.4

Find the new release here: http://eclipse.org/jgit/download/ http://eclipse.org/egit/download/

JGit is also available via Maven Central: http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Corg.eclipse.jgit%...

smrtinsert5• 12 years ago

Importing all my plugins right now. Excited to try out dark theme, but last I checked it didn't quite look right on Win unless you modified your os chrome...

edit:nope, still doesnt look good. i guess the problem is with swt delegating as much as poss to the os, but still :(

benjaminpv3• 12 years ago

Seconding this. I'm using plugins to have a pseudo-dark theme (a lot of the UI is standard but a lot of the editing surfaces are dark), so I was excited to give dark theme a try.

Black text on a dark background, the disclosure triangles in option panels are black against dark gray.

virtualwhys4• 12 years ago

Have you considered installing a screen inversion program on Windows and then stripping out all the wasted space from the Eclipse UI?

That way you'll have your total dark Eclipse (not just themable parts) of the fun.

I don't grok themes, in my Eclipse there's not a pixel of wasted space (short of toggling the main menu which I haven't figured out yet). How Eclipse looks is moot when it looks like VIM ;-)

smrtinsert5• 12 years ago

I can control the space with Jeeeyuls plugin which I use, however Windows only seems to invert the entire desktop or nothing. Do you know of an inverter that can target per executable? (basically launch only eclipse inverted)

braydenjw• 12 years ago

Agreed. Can't really complain when it's free software. I much prefer dark themes for IDEs, but I'll still be using the default one for Eclipse.

thomas112• 12 years ago

"includes 61 million lines of code" sounds scary, even if it's much more than an IDE these days.

benjaminpv3• 12 years ago

I've spent a lot of time excising built-in, uninstallable plugins from Kepler so I definitely find myself agreeing with this.

I won't bemoan free software and when Eclipse works it's great but boy howdy could it do with a Mozilla->Phoenix/Firefox style split where a lot of the things that are integrated into the base install (are there really people using things like Mylyn?) are removed, leaving just the bare IDE.

lmm• 12 years ago

They've done a lot of this with their "packages"; if you download e.g. "Eclipse IDE for Java Developers" then it includes a lot less than the "default" version (though admittedly Mylyn is still included).

flaie• 12 years ago

I use Mylyn at work to link Eclipse with JIRA using the Atlassian connector. I can interact with JIRA without leaving Eclipse if I want.

lomnakkus3• 12 years ago

The really obnoxious thing about the plugins is that they are (as you mentioned) friggin' uninstallable and cannot even be disabled (aka prevented from loading). Why? Who thought that was a good idea?

This was a big regression for me when the super-annoying Git plugin was bundled with Eclipse -- having to manually remove bundles from the installation directory is not a lot of fun nor a very robust method of plugin uninstallation. :(

EDIT: I will of course try this release, but I predict that I'll be sticking with IDEA.

virtualwhys4• 12 years ago

Why not go with a minimal install?

Eclipse Platform and JDT runtime binaries do the trick here. Add-on must-have plugins as needed. Eclipse Standard has a whole bunch o' kitchen sink...

fithisux• 12 years ago

That is why we have clojure or scala for. Semantic invariant code compression.

thomas112• 12 years ago

Sounds interesting, could you elaborate?

paperwork• 12 years ago

I'm a fan of eclipse, but this release reveals an interesting thing about the organization, they aren't very effective at communication.

If this had been an intellij release, a bunch of screenshots would have been on their main page and each main feature would have had a small explanation. As I write this, one of the commenters has mentioned 'dark theme.' Forget about being on the main page, I had a hard time googling it.

Ironically, as far as I know, it was eclipse which started "New and Noteworthy" pages with each release (that's development release, not even main release). Every google link to such pages is now broken as well.

As intellij is picking up steam, eclipse is actually regressing (at least in the marketing department).

caniszczyk2• 12 years ago

It's an open source foundation with a set of loosely distributed set of projects and teams.

The New and Noteworthy screenshots are here for Luna: https://www.eclipse.org/eclipse/news/4.4/eclipse_news_4.4.ph...

I would report a bug against the old N&N pages not being available (via Community): https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/

aks314• 12 years ago

That is an excellent new features guide, but it really needs to be placed alongside a release announcement on the front page. Also these 2 links seem similar but are really different, a bit confusing:

https://www.eclipse.org

https://www.eclipse.org/home

agumonkey• 12 years ago

A few years ago (2005-2008) they were more into communication, they made the first synchronous release (eclipse + lead subprojects). Since then they went under the radar.

smrtinsert5• 12 years ago

Well tbh its like clockwork. This is a team that yearly releases tons of updates, when its that regular you dont really promotion. I'm always downloading first day.

The only compatibility issue I found was with stupid Perforce which hasn't been updated to the latest icu4j yet. That's amazing for the 50 or so plugins I run.

Other than that I use community plugins (Perforce mandated by employer)

VonGuard• 12 years ago

They may suck at marketing, but Mike gave me a pretty in-depth briefing. Have a gander: http://www.sdtimes.com/content/article.aspx?ArticleID=71423&...

aikah2• 12 years ago

Love eclipse but it's definetly a Java/JEE/JVM IDE. Other projects (JDT,PDT,...) are just not that much maintained.

Netbeans while it has far less features than Eclipse in more balanced when it comes to web tech support.

thejdude• 12 years ago

So by JDT you mean something other than the Java Development Tools of Eclipse, I guess.

To me, Eclipse has been mostly stable/stagnant for many years (4.2 has actually felt like a regression from 3.x, in that the UI lots some features, like how/where to position views).

NetBeans had been lacking, but the current version seems to have improved lot for Java development (I last tried it several years ago), and it has always looked much better than Eclipse, IMHO. (Ironically, the fake-native Swing looks much nicer than Eclipse with native scrollbars+buttons, but non-native everything else like the tool-, sorry, "Coolbar" and its weird tabs (incredibly ugly, esp. the "new" ones).)

The interesting changes to Eclipse to make it more future-proof have been under the hood, I think, like a more modern plugin runtime (but I don't really know details on that one).

aikah2• 12 years ago

Sorry i mean the javascript/webtech plugin,forgot the name JSDT perhaps,need to check it. ;)

smrtinsert5• 12 years ago

Now sure how Eclipse itself would function if they didn't support PDT.

shire• 12 years ago

Anyone got a screenshot of the dark theme?

edit: never mind I saw the youtube video. Looks cool.

benjaminpv3• 12 years ago

Looks cool.

If you say so... http://imgur.com/HAKnRwU

smrtinsert5• 12 years ago

SWT on win :P Awesome till customization required. Who said native was a good idea again for ui? I'm starting to see why Swing can be preferable. I wonder how well JavaFX does with theming.

craigching2• 12 years ago

Yeah, just tried out the dark theme on Linux ... it's horrible!

EDIT: To be clear, running Fedora 20 GTK, it looks pretty bad, light gray on white text for package explorer.

rogerbinns2• 12 years ago

Does anyone know why Ubuntu still ships with version 3.8 as standard, and Eclipse 4.x isn't in the repositories at all?

My searches show some rumbling about 4.x performance problems a few years ago, since resolved.

boobsbr• 12 years ago

I find it easier to just download the Linux tarball instead of installing the platform and plugins from aptitude.

rogerbinns2• 12 years ago

I did that a few times, but it was a pain. I strongly prefer using the apt repositories since things integrate well.

fiatmoney• 12 years ago

My understanding is that 3.8 is a backport of Juno (AKA 4.2) features on the 3.x platform.

jgillich• 12 years ago

Probably because Debian still has 3.8 (even in unstable) and they don't maintain/update the package themselves. If you want the latest packages, you might need to look elsewhere. Fedora for example already has 4.4 in rawhide and they might push it to stable in a few days.

hrjet• 12 years ago

Excited about this release, and I am going to try it right away.

But I have to mention my pet peeve. The downloads are through mirrors, over http, with no checksums! What could go wrong?

copperx• 12 years ago

So you are the reason why some downloads have checksums?

Paranoid much?

craigching2• 12 years ago

Ian Bull's annual top 10 Eclipse features (for Luna this year):

http://eclipsesource.com/blogs/2014/06/25/top-10-eclipse-lun...

elipsey• 12 years ago

Does it have full screen mode yet?

electrotype• 12 years ago

Is there a way to launch a specific run/debug configuration using hotkeys now? Someone knows?

specialist• 12 years ago

I'm in the process of migrating to IntelliJ. The 4.x releases broke the plugins I wrote and I couldn't figure out how to get them working again. Stuff like incremental builders. Life's too short.

Too bad. I've used Eclipse since the alphas. It's muscle memory for me.

nileshk• 12 years ago

After over a decade of using Eclipse, I switched to IntelliJ about two months ago, and I'm very glad I did.

I was actually able to retain mostly the same keymap (I use a heavily customized Emacs/OS X/Eclipse keymap), so I didn't have to retrain my muscle memory much. IntelliJ's keybinding configuration is very flexible, and most of the features I like from Eclipse exist in IntelliJ, and it seems like everything has a keybinding. There was a few things that I couldn't get quite the same, but they were minor enough that I've adjusted (e.g. Emacs-style incremental search isn't quite the same -- it's just as effective, but the keystrokes/behavior for exiting out of it are different).

Zigurd• 12 years ago

A cool thing about the past couple releases is that Eclipse is not a "forklift upgrade" any more. All you need to do is add

http://download.eclipse.org/releases/luna

to your "Available Software Sites" in your Install/Update preferences and then check for updates.

zipperhead• 12 years ago

Thanks, I didn't realize you could do this. I've already updated via tarball but maybe will try this next time.

By the way this is documented in the FAQ: https://wiki.eclipse.org/FAQ_How_do_I_upgrade_Eclipse%3F

Eclipse 4.4, Luna, released

Related Stories