Installing every* Firefox extension

https://jack.cab/blog/every-firefox-extension

by RohanAdwankar • 3 months ago

692 77 3 months ago

gathered• 3 months ago

I'm laughing so hard at the video, I imagine this is what browsing the web is like for the elderly that barely know how to use a computer. Can someone do this in Chrome?

Eddy_Viscosity2• 3 months ago

Where is the video, I scanned through and only saw still images.

rented_mule• 3 months ago

It's inline. Search the page for (and heed): epilepsy warning

SeanAnderson• 3 months ago

https://jack.cab/blog/every-firefox-extension#attempts-4-10-...

stratos123• 3 months ago

My favorite part was the metal pipe sound effect. Wish the author investigated which extension does that.

Evidlo• 3 months ago

Maybe it was this?

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/random-metal-...

lucasmullens• 3 months ago

For some reason that metal pipe sound was a meme a few years ago, a picture of a pipe and that sound has 5 million views on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDLmYZ5HqgM

walrus012• 3 months ago

If you turn loose a completely untrained person to click yes/accept/download/OK/I agree on every type of user interface popup, particularly a person who has no ability to distinguish between a user interface question presented by the operating system itself and something inside of a browser window, that's what you'll get...

RussianCow• 3 months ago

I have a vivid memory of once looking over someone's shoulder in the IE days and being horrified to see toolbars taking up about 80% of the available screen real estate, leaving only maybe 150-200 pixels of vertical space for actual web browsing. I have no idea how they got anything done, and my guess was they never actually used any of the installed toolbars and just thought that was normal.

girvo• 3 months ago

I’m aware, that’s exactly what my grandfathers (rest in peace grandpa, I miss you) IE window looked and felt like in the early 2010s!

Shadowmist• 3 months ago

You can just say AI

abustamam• 3 months ago

I was recently doing some maintenance on my mom's iPhone SE and was quite shocked at how many random apps she had installed. Random forums, shopping apps, etc. Bespoke mobile app wrappers for simple web apps may be the new 'toolbar' or 'browser extension'

amelius• 3 months ago

That will be one hell of a bug report.

m1322• 3 months ago

Loved the brutal realization that came when the seemingly broken Extensions button the author was mashing for solid 30 seconds turned out to be a fake, extension-supplied one. One... of three.

xg154• 3 months ago

There was also a nice dramatic arc to it, with the browser first (seemingly) behaving normally, then starting with a few scattered theme switches, then going increasingly off the rails as more and more extensions start up.

Also the metal pipe.

xnorswap• 3 months ago

This article is wonderful crazy.

The icing on the cake is the discovery of a potential performance bug in one or more of the about: pages, that's definitely worthy of following up.

ryanisnan• 3 months ago

Dang this is so good. Well done.

username135• 3 months ago

"I got basically all the extensions with this, making everything I did before this look really stupid."

I geel this on a deep personal level.

lapcat• 3 months ago

It turns out there’s only 84 thousand Firefox extensions.

On addons.mozilla.org, but you can distribute Firefox extensions without posting on addons.mozilla.org. I do.

tech234a3• 3 months ago

Other examples I recall when looking into this: Zotero browser connector for Firefox, Chrome Remote Desktop for Firefox (I think it adds a few features for connections to remote desktops)

pndy• 3 months ago

I'm pretty sure that there were much more XUL and XPCOM extensions back then +10 years ago before mozilla pulled out the plug for that platform and moved to WebExtensions

layer8• 3 months ago

I did some research to find why this took so long. 13 years ago, extensions.json used to be extensions.sqlite. Nowadays, extensions.json is serialized and rewritten in full on every write debounced to 20 ms, which works fine for 15 extensions but not 84,194.

Occasionally, databases are useful. ;)

Waterluvian• 3 months ago

This is probably a good example of the opposite. It would be a mistake to design for the fleetingly rare case. If you’re dealing with a handful of extensions, a json file that’s rewritten is fine.

HPsquared• 3 months ago

In an ideal world, software with 100 million users would be optimised for energy usage. It all adds up. This does pale in comparison to everything else, though.

shakna• 3 months ago

But the software already has multiple database systems built in. There's not exactly overhead to use what plumbing is already there, instead of writing to disk.

proactivesvcs• 3 months ago

"In terms of implementation, the most interesting one is “Іron Wаllеt” (the I, a, and e are Cyrillic). Three seconds after install, it fetches the phishing page’s URL from the first record of a NocoDB spreadsheet and opens it [...] The API key had write access, so I wiped the spreadsheet."

methodist• 3 months ago

The extension is actually still up: hxxps://addons[.]mozilla[.]org/en-US/firefox/addon/%D1%96ron-w%D0%B0ll%D0%B5t/

thephyber• 3 months ago

Did you just admit to a CFAA violation?

weird-eye-issue2• 3 months ago

What do you mean by "you"? Do you know what quotes are?

sunaookami• 3 months ago

Won't someone think of the poor phishers!

thegdsks• 3 months ago

Good Luck Remembering all those icons.. Amazing

walrus012• 3 months ago

In general concept this reminds me a bit of adding every possible installer .EXE based Internet Explorer browser toolbar to Windows 98

https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Fz...

https://fergido.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/too...

BoppreH• 3 months ago

Sad that no real pages can load successfully, but I thoroughly enjoyed the writing.

We turned on crash reporting on the way.

I haven't burst out laughing like this in a while! You'll probably make for some horror stories to a poor Mozilla team.

tech234a3• 3 months ago

Firefox crash reports are public though unfortunately I was unable to find their crashes: https://crash-stats.mozilla.org/

EDIT: if they still have the profile they can actually find the crash ID for their crash report: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/troubleshoot-firefox-cr...

RobotToaster• 3 months ago

All those extensions probably crashed the crash reporter

throwatdem12311• 3 months ago

Turns out even browser extensions can be comedy.

benlimanto2• 3 months ago

It's a fun comedy to watch man. haha... how we developer design and how usually user use, is different matter!

youknownothing• 3 months ago

Is this the digital version of Supersize Me?

codemog• 3 months ago

I love the small few who take the time to do crazy stuff like this. Very entertaining.

tech234a3• 3 months ago

Alternatively you may be able to list the extensions using the sitemap: https://addons.mozilla.org/sitemap.xml

Chrome Web Store has something similar: https://chromewebstore.google.com/sitemap

And Edge: https://microsoftedge.microsoft.com/sitemap.xml

ArneVogel2• 3 months ago

I won the "Middle Finger Emoji Sticker" Award! (https://jack.cab/blog/every-firefox-extension#the-middle-fin...)

I quickly wrote up how: https://www.arnevogel.com/firefox-permissions/

thehias• 3 months ago

why dont you use your own extension?

ArneVogel2• 3 months ago

I used it on my old pc, but I don't buy still that regularly online so I guess I forgot to reinstall it again. Also it is outdated by now as the domain list hasn't updated in two years.

benlimanto2• 3 months ago

At least you put effort into it and break it.

Yet Dr.B extension keep balooning and getting crazier day by day!

Now as I write this, it has 97 extensions from prior 84 extension

Man, how many slop will he keep putting out there.

3abiton• 3 months ago

Dr. B is the king of slop, with 84 extensions published, all of them vibe coded. How do I know? Most of their extensions has a README.md in them describing their process of getting these through addon review, and mention Grok 3. Also, not a single one of them have icons or screenshots. Personally, I’m shocked this number is this low. I expected to see some developers with hundreds!

This is really surprising. Either because Firefox is not that popular ir mozilla has an automatic filter?

mmsc• 3 months ago

The website of this blog and their connections listed are a sight to behold. I miss that version of the internet.

mid-kid• 3 months ago

Seeing this article, and how much webextensions manage to mess up the browser, I'm wondering how bad this experiment would've been with the legacy XUL extensions. Maybe they had a point in getting rid of them...

egeozcan• 3 months ago

In this blog post: Let's Game It Out[1] meets web browsing.

[1] https://www.letsgameitout.tv/

fulNamSexBoomer• 3 months ago

This obviously showcases that Firefox needs to work on their support for having all browser extensions at once. Users want and need this.

Avamander• 3 months ago

I would suspect that some of the slowdown that the author encountered does occur with even a dozen or so add-ons. Why else would Firefox bother you about resetting your profile if you haven't returned in a while?

curioussquirrel• 3 months ago

Absolutely unhinged and very entertaining. Thanks for sharing!

cachius• 3 months ago

Reminds me of the NPM package that depended es on all other NPM packages https://uncenter.dev/posts/npm-install-everything/

jason1cho• 3 months ago

This article is interesting but hard to read in certain places because it contains distracting information.

Better to organize it into main findings and side stories.

xg154• 3 months ago

The eternal tension between "this service mesh is completely overengineered for our usecase" and "our broker is far to slow for our 84.205 microservices"...

m1322• 3 months ago

Brings back the memories of using Internet Explorer when every other installer was fighting for toolbar space!

Every Internet café had at least 2, with Ask.com, Google, Yahoo and later on, Bing being the main contenders.

xg154• 3 months ago

I did some research to find why this took so long. 13 years ago, extensions.json used to be extensions.sqlite. Nowadays, extensions.json is serialized and rewritten in full on every write debounced to 20 ms, which works fine for 15 extensions but not 84,194.

I'm slightly worried how they arrived at that debounce value. Which extensions need to write to extensions.json continuously, several times a second?

Someone• 3 months ago

I don’t think extensions ever write that file; Firefox writes it whenever its in-memory set of installed extensions is updated.

When Firefox finds new extensions, it updates the in-memory set for each of them.

In the typical case that series of updates will be small, and the denounce makes it likely the file gets written only once.

Kholin• 3 months ago

Firefox should provide an option to disable the auto popup pages after any extension installed.

majkinetor• 3 months ago

What is amazing is that Firefox can actually run at all with that many extensions installed.

anthk• 3 months ago

GNU Abrowser and Icecat both point to a curated list of FLOSS licensed extensions.

danlitt• 3 months ago

Is the scraping code available? (in order to regenerate the dataset later)

rossdavidh• 3 months ago

My favorite line: "I got basically all the extensions with this, making everything I did before this look really stupid."

Not at all; all good developers succeed by finding ways to make their past work look unnecessarily complicated.

alberto-m• 3 months ago

Really great writing and interesting experiment! I love the small details like the “clueless user”-style crash report in the `about:telemetry` section (“it just crashed out of nowhere”)

butterlesstoast• 3 months ago

I got so much joy out of seeing it take 32 gigs of RAM. Bravo.

evolve2k• 3 months ago

I’d like to image with a bit more work, the Firefox core dev team funding this into a CI test and chipping aaay at performance both of Firefox and policies around what goes in the store. Better scanners when extensizoms are unplosded would likely suppprt big gains in removing the poorest quality stuff here and addressing what is leaking memory and is over resource hungry.

6510• 3 months ago

There use to be lots of "handy" programs and toolbars for windows xp and internet explorer. You know, the kind of things no one in their right mind would install. I think people learned to code and wanted to make something?

My theory was that if you are going to make something you will at least try to make something useful. The free extra toolbar, context or menu button will need some selling point.

So I did what every senseless person would do and started gathering lots and lots of "handy" programs and "tools". I install them one by one and then I try to use them as if I was entirely serious about it.

IMHO the important part of the process is to identify useless things early (and convincingly) and get rid of it.

Quite a lot of them looked like someone put some real work into it and they all got to stay. It took quite some effort to learn to use all of them the way intended but to my complete surprise some of them were actually useful.

Besides google toolbar the only one I remember by name is slickrun[0]. Out of all addons competing for search this one also launched applications and opened folders by typing the first letters of a configured keyword and had a hot key.

One truly fabulous tool was an extra windows toolbar button that folded out a context menu with a full blown web directory with 10 layers of nested sub menus. What made it fabulous was the sheer amount of effort someone (or multiple someones) made in organizing and curating thousands of websites into sub sub sub sub menus. Every time I thought (for laughs) I'd try find something there it not just was there but it lived in a very obvious place, surrounded by related stuff worth checking out.

I had 3 different spelling and autocomplete tools competing for the best suggestion. IEspel usually won as they send all text input to the server. Most shocking was that if you shifted your hands one character to the right it guessed flawlessly what you wanted to type even if non of the characters were correct. I loaded one with some popular phrases.

One of the text complete tools also competed with several clipboard history laboratories.

Without a license one could install limited Microsoft desktop buddies[2] but after installing many trial applications that had them I gathered a big team of different ones that were shared between applications. This is important because some tools offered screen reading that worked really well in any application. Being "serous" about the process I carefully configured everything which naturally resulted in configuring trillian reading irc out loud, each user with a different voice and a different desktop buddy. IRC had transformed into theater. I just let it run all day and repeatedly cried from laughter. I couldn't remember all the names but different voices are hard to forget.

The context menu of "every firefox extension" was nowhere near as terrible as mine. Mine had arrows to scroll and it kept going.

[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20050211033123/https://www.bayde... (the image in the center at the top is the entire ui, one can drag it around and it floats on top of other windows)

[2] https://the-microsoft-windows-xp.fandom.com/wiki/Rover

efreak• 3 months ago

Bayden SlickRun is still around, I use it daily for launching most of my programs (the only annoyance is the `hide` magicword gets interpreted as `hibernate` occasionally due to my typing `hi` and hitting enter). Unlike many other launchers, SlickRun uses minimal resources and can be configured to show useful information if you leave it on-screen (these days I have it set to auto-hide, as I have enough memory to not worry about it). Typing three keys to get auto complete and hitting enter is faster than searching the run menu (regardless of what implementation you use). I was very annoyed when I installed windows 10 and had to change my hotkey. (Much like I'm now annoyed at Windows 11 for hijacking the printscreen key I use for ShareX)

Installing every* Firefox extension

Related Stories