Nvidia AI Lead: We are ~3 years from the ChatGPT moment for physical AI agents

https://twitter.com/DrJimFan/status/1740041712184246314

by atticora • 3 years ago

21 16 3 years ago

i8comments• 3 years ago

Twitter predictions by invested people should be taken with a grain of salt.

ChatGTP• 3 years ago

(1) NVIDIA Isaac can simulate reality at 1000x faster than real-time. The incoming data stream scales as compute scales.

What does this mean? Sounds like frantic bullshit

mgerullis• 3 years ago

Sounds like Minority Report

petermcneeley• 3 years ago

"Insane amounts of progress on robust hardware: Tesla Optimus ..."

gumballindie• 3 years ago

ChatGPT is a low quality intense marketing product. Are they sure they dont want to do better?

iseanstevens• 3 years ago

ChatGPT fails due to lack of easy confirmation of correctness.

Most physical world thiigs have immediate feedback of incorrectness.

Bumping into something unexpectedly or falling over could be a built in way for models to self improve.

Self driving cars go WAY too fast for our current level of processing/sensors.

All IMHO.

TerrifiedMouse• 3 years ago

Most physical world thiigs have immediate feedback of incorrectness.

We might not want it to enter such circumstances where there is such feedback - e.g. car has run over a child. We generally aren’t interested in what the AI does in response to such feedback as such feedback should never ever occur.

gigel822• 3 years ago

Insane amounts of progress on robust hardware: Tesla Optimus

He lost me at this one. Tesla will need a lot more public verifiable proof of progress to look past the "guy in a spandex suit" thing...

KiwiJohnno• 3 years ago

Yeah 100% the initial announcement of Optimus was waaay to early, typical Elon bullshit to generate hype. But it is a real thing they are working on, and they have come a long way (considering they came from a guy in a spandex suit...)

Watch their latest update: https://youtu.be/D2vj0WcvH5c

gigel822• 3 years ago

That video screams CGI... that's why I said we need public and verifiable proof.

goatlover• 3 years ago

Would be more convincing coming from someone working at Boston Dynamics.

justinclift• 3 years ago

https://nitter.net/DrJimFan/status/1740041712184246314

rhinoman• 3 years ago

I believe "Nvidia AI Lead" isn't accurate (and unnecessary here).

Author seems to have been working for only about 2 years since their PhD. While that shouldn't mean their opinion should be disregarded, it undermines the appeal to authority that is implied in the title.

oh_sigh• 3 years ago

His Twitter bio says he is the lead of Nvidia AI Agents. I guess that makes him an AI lead, but not the AI lead.

buryat• 3 years ago

it reads as "buy NVDA stock", a person working for nvidia trying to hype it as much as possible

up2isomorphism• 3 years ago

What does "Nvidia AI Lead" even mean? BTW the post looks like generated by ChatGPT.

Nvidia AI Lead: We are ~3 years from the ChatGPT moment for physical AI agents

Related Stories