Brutal OS reached milestone 4

The idea is to take all the concepts we like about UNIX and iterate on them. It's UNIX as if it was invented now. For example, let's have a C compiler but let's add lambda and a more complete type system. Or let's have a shell, but let's have full ide like autocomplete to it. Or instead of plain text, let's use JSON

ianai7• 4 years ago

Sick. How far along is it?

Any chance of bringing in Plan9 type ideas/concepts? Ie being able to mount remote compute resources similar to mounting file systems in UNIX? (As the one real plan9-ism in mind at the moment.)

humanrebar• 4 years ago

A language like C but with lambdas isn't really C, not that that's a bad thing.

I was a little surprised that a compiler was in scope given the amount of other work that needed to be written and (hopefully) supported, though I guess that's a different issue.

__d• 4 years ago

What (if any) is the overlap with Plan9 (and its various forks and derivatives, including Inferno)?

Given KenC, I was amused to see that Brutal has its own C variant too!

PolCPP• 4 years ago

That kerning on that "hello world" vector font demo though

monax10• 4 years ago

Yeah kerning is still WIP

rwmj• 4 years ago

Honestly the amount of crazy code involved in Linux font rendering[1], and then you get to CJKV support[2], it's mind-boggling. Even then, it's nowhere near as good as macOS :-/

[1] https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pango & https://github.com/harfbuzz/harfbuzz

[2] https://www.amazon.co.uk/CJKV-Information-Processing-Ken-Lun...

1MachineElf• 4 years ago

If it had kerning, then would it still be brutalist?

smilespray• 4 years ago

In this case, keming is a more appropriate term.

taneq• 4 years ago

My favourite patch note of all time is from Path of Exile and reads simply “Fixed keming.”

WithinReason• 4 years ago

You mean letter spacing? It looks like there is no kerning going on.

dec0dedab0de• 4 years ago

What is that hardware in the cover image? Is it even real?

taspeotis• 4 years ago

In most modern browsers you can right click an image and send it to Google to reverse image search it for you.

https://www.reddit.com/r/DesignPorn/comments/ei1pa8/sphinx_s...

https://kbd.news/Project-Sphinx-711.html

amelius• 4 years ago

It looks cool but the keyboard is almost square, making it difficult to touch the keys in the top row while still resting your hands. A flat aspect ratio (like most keyboards have) would be better. It's easier to move your fingers over large distances horizontally than vertically; see also the piano keyboard.

p_l• 4 years ago

It was a design study from Soviet Union in I think 1980s, but no real hardware got built.

ricardobeat• 4 years ago

The OS looks quite interesting, but the GUI library caught my attention - hope there are plans to make it available separately.

mysterydip• 4 years ago

They said it runs on macOS and linux, so I would assume so

supercyp• 4 years ago

The gui library is able to be used on Linux. But For the moment we can’t do hardware acceleration (but it is still really fast without it).

encryptluks2• 4 years ago

Are you planning on supporting Vulkan?

konart• 4 years ago

That Soviet PC though... Shame we'll never see it.

mywacaday• 4 years ago

What is it, thought it was a render?

El_RIDO• 4 years ago

That's Project SPHINX: https://www.inexhibit.com/case-studies/project-sphinx-when-t...

rsecora• 4 years ago

Soviet computer:

https://www.inexhibit.com/case-studies/project-sphinx-when-t...

7xhonks2• 4 years ago

vv cool! I got it to build and run except I couldnt get the mouse to move, but still seems very neat. Hope I can try contributing a bit!

monax10• 4 years ago

Hi, can you open an issue on Github?

7xhonks2• 4 years ago

I'm not sure what was going on, but Its now working.

Also the C code is pretty interesting, I like that its built up result types and generic types but also in c, very cool, if not a little bit wild :)

sylware2• 4 years ago

Where is their "brutal toolchain" (not GNU, not LLVM) able to bootstrap build their OS from kernel to user space? (sarcasm).

I wish they prove me wrong.

monax10• 4 years ago

Working on it https://github.com/brutal-org/brutal/tree/main/sources/libs/...

It as already has some neat feature like C2json

sylware2• 4 years ago

They are doing it the right way.

But we should not get ahead of ourselves, let's wait for them to fully self-bootstrap 'brutal' with their toolchain.

0des2• 4 years ago

Very cool project, and i want that hardware badly... But... Please add some margin on your article before someone gets hurt

monax10• 4 years ago

Thanks, I'm fixing it asap

NoGravitas• 4 years ago

I believe that is a Soviet Project SPHINX system - a design for a smart home network that never actually got produced due to the fall of the Soviet Union.

https://blog.adafruit.com/2021/12/13/project-sphinx-when-the...

0des2• 4 years ago

Even if it only involves stuffing a raspberry pi into something, I want to yell at someone over the phone from my penthouse office in front of that thing while 80s power-montage music plays.

eternityforest• 4 years ago

That's amazing! I didn't even know displays like that existed at the time.

I wonder where we would be now if that had gone according to plan.

Brian_K_White• 4 years ago

I love this.

einpoklum2• 4 years ago

BRUTAL is an operating system built from scratch in modern C.

Modern as in C11?

BRUTAL is built on top of a capabilty based micro-kernel.

Their own, or somebody else's? Why can't they just say which?

BRUTAL targets x86_64, i686, RISC-V and ARM.

Ok, a decent set of targets, certainly for starting out with.

BRUTAL exposes its features to developers through clean APIs.

Which are listed where?

BRUTAL features a rich and modern C library complete with fibers, custom allocators, generic data structures, and more...

Did they reimplement the entire C library? Added a backed/port for an existing library?

I like Brutalism in design, don't like Minimalism in documentation.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=brutalism&t=ffab&iar=images&iax=im...

monax10• 4 years ago

Hi, Sorry if our doc is not fully fleshed out yet, the project is still in the early stages, and APIs and idioms keep changing rapidly.

Modern as in C11?

As in bleeding-edge C23

Their own, or somebody else's? Why can't they just say which?

Our own

Which are listed where?

We have a Doxygen doc but it's not published yet.

Did they reimplement the entire C library?

Yes

Hopes this answers your questions

ianai7• 4 years ago

This is really awesome. I'll definitely be following the development of this OS!

You figure you'll keep with the bleeding edge C standards for the future?

Also, if someone wanted to build compatibility layers out to other FOSS OSes into the system somewhere would that be tolerated? For example drivers from other OSes could massively improve quality of life and usability.

einpoklum2• 4 years ago

Thanks for the prompt response and +1 for me. But... why spell this out _here_? Add that info to your documentation. For a new OS to be adopted, good documentation is probably even more important than good performance :-P

As in bleeding-edge C23

Well... looking at what's coming C23: https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/23

I see mostly syntactic sugar and a few adoptions from POSIX; and C17 didn't change much either. So, for me, this is basically C11 - which I still find very modern and does not seem that widely adopted TBH. So good on you. (But make sure to support code in older C standard versions.)

Also, I doubt that it is really a good idea to reimplement libc. I would assume taking on even more work than the already huge effort that is an OS would either slow you down or reduce quality. IIRC, when Linux got started, Torvalds ported gcc along with glibc and also bash. Could you explain your choice of a different direction?

nyx_land• 4 years ago

It's cool and all that there seem to be more alternative OSes gaining momentum recently with things like this and SerenityOS and it's definitely impressive how much work people have put into them, but I can't for the life of me understand why you would go through the massive task of trying to make your own OS and then just copy Unix. These are 60 year old ideas that were largely born out of hardware constraints -- we have the ability to experiment with different design ideas now.

ianai7• 4 years ago

There's a lot to be said for ideas which hit it so "on the nail" in the IT world that they manage to stick around for so many decades. An alternative take, too, could be basing an OS on bleeding edge C23 and new releases into the future should act as something of a modern baseline of the UNIX standard. That could be used as a starting point or comparison for future OS development.

Or, perhaps at worst, it probably makes the developers very aware of how the current *nix flavors could be improved from the lowest levels on up.

0235005• 4 years ago

Is there a discord server or where does community gathers? This projects seems really cool and I would like to contribute.

monax10• 4 years ago

yes :) https://discord.com/invite/gamGsfg

systemvoltage• 4 years ago

Not Brutal enough. We have rounded corners in the UI.

Brutal OS reached milestone 4

Related Stories