Nextdoor ends its program for forwarding suspicions to police

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-06-19/why-nextdoor-cut-its-forward-to-police-tool

by pseudolus • 6 years ago

177 110 6 years ago

Civil rights and privacy advocates have raised concerns about how the feature streamlined the reporting of suspicions about minor offenses, encouraging police to follow up on what would have otherwise been casual observations on social media.

Why is this a problem? Minor offenses are still offenses and they can often be very frustrating and problematic. They still deserve police attention where they constitute a violation of the law. Streamlining the process is a positive not negative, and the framing here just seems like these activist groups don’t want people to be held accountable.

PeterisP• 6 years ago

I believe that this results in this being used as a tool of harassment against people who are less popular in the neighbourhood for arbitrary - sometimes discriminatory - reasons.

alistairSH• 6 years ago

Because on Nextdoor, walking down the street while black in the wrong neighborhood is a minor offense. That site is a complete cesspool.

samatman• 6 years ago

You are of course correct about minor offenses.

I suggest you show the courage of your convictions, and do a few hour's research on exactly how much is illegal at present.

Then, turn yourself in for only the Federal crimes you've committed in the past year.

We'll never see you again, of course, but it's a small price to pay.

TheSpiceIsLife4• 6 years ago

This would be a fun way to antagonise the police.

Flash mob style, waiting in line, no! camping out for days waiting in line, not to buy tickets to the next reiteration of $sameoldstorybutwithmorelensflare, but to turn yourself in with video evidence of jaywalking or cycling without a helmet.

thrwaway_3212• 6 years ago

You can both disagree with petty laws for minor violations and still want prohibitions against theft or public disturbances enforced in your neighborhood.

pooper• 6 years ago

Why is this a problem? Minor offenses are still offenses and they can often be very frustrating and problematic. They still deserve police attention where they constitute a violation of the law. Streamlining the process is a positive not negative, and the framing here just seems like these activist groups don’t want people to be held accountable.

Be careful of what you wish for. You might wish to look at your local municipal/county/parish/state laws. I likely break dozens of laws/ordinances every day and I'm very positive you do as well, without even knowing it.

I am very saddened that I have to spell this out. I don't know whether you use NextDoor, throwawaysea. Would you be willing to post this under your real name in NextDoor and share the link here?

SilasX2• 6 years ago

I likely break dozens of laws/ordinances every day and I'm very positive you do as well, without even knowing it.

Okay but then isn't that the real problem? Of not regularly weeding out laws against things that people don't really feel need to be banned? It's kind of clumsy to take the approach of, "We're going to keep dubious laws on the books, and also have ultra-random, haphazard enforcement of all laws regardless of how merited."

Kiro2• 6 years ago

I likely break dozens of laws/ordinances every day and I'm very positive you do as well, without even knowing it.

Any examples?

duskwuff2• 6 years ago

I don't know whether you use NextDoor, throwawaysea. Would you be willing to post this under your real name in NextDoor and share the link here?

That sounds to me rather like you're saying "tell us your real name or you're lying", which seems a rather specious (and hostile) argument.

newacct583• 6 years ago

Minor offenses are still offenses

The problem, as is always the case, is that "minor offenses" are not equitably enforced.

So if the local white kids are hanging out at the corner of the park smoking weed, no one cares. No one posts to Nextdoor. The police don't show up. But four young hispanic men walking through the same white neighborhood (to get to a job, say) will freak someone out and a busybody post to nextdoor will end up getting them stopped. Oh, and it turns out that one of them has weed in his pocket. There's your "minor offense". It's still an offense, right? It deserves police attention?

You're looking at this with a microscope. No one is saying don't enforce boring laws. People are saying do it fairly. Nattering busybodies on Nextdoor are the opposite of fair.

jquery4• 6 years ago

Nattering busybodies on Nextdoor

What is more fair than locals choosing which stuff is bothering them?

ponker• 6 years ago

Because what is an “offense” is designed to capture a certain kind of person who harms the public but leaves the other, much more harmful kind, untouched. What is the harm caused by stealing a package off a doorstep compared to creating a Facebook ad for oversexualized garments targeting young girls? Compared to marketing addictive pharmaceuticals to people who do not need them? Compared to issuing a fraudulent AAA rating on a mortgage backed security and selling it to a pension fund? Which gets the police involved?

TheSpiceIsLife4• 6 years ago

The problem isn’t minor offences as such.

It’s the reporting of the suspicion.

I don’t need my neighbour calling the police on the suspicious of $minor_offence.

mindslight• 6 years ago

Police departments are failing to arrest murderers even when there is ample evidence. Let's focus on the felonies until they can get those right.

wespiser_20183• 6 years ago

I live in an immediate suburb of Boston, and joined Nextdoor and joined to see what features were attracting so many folks to a new social media platform. Wow! Anyone with a tattoo, going to your door for any reason was considered "suspicious" and reported. One alarming thing, is that NextDoor is feeding on our fears about outsiders who look different, and creating a loop out of this for higher engagement when people post pictures and engage their camera feed.

It's too bad, I think idea of organizing a social network based on proximity and centered around community information is a viable idea, It's just that NextDoor is doing that with our worst instincts.

heavyset_go3• 6 years ago

This has been my experience, as well. Take this type of echo chamber to its extreme, and you get this[1] kind of reaction from an entire community, where they end up chasing a Hispanic family out of town because someone said they were antifa on Facebook[2].

[1] https://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/2020/06/fa...

[2] https://twitter.com/RandazzoTweets/status/126860852649191014...

TheSpiceIsLife4• 6 years ago

Ok, I read both the links you provided, and it would appear your words:

reaction from an entire community, where they end up chasing a Hispanic family out of town

Is a drastic overstatement of what happened.

Or did I miss something? Are there really only four vehicles in the entire community of Forks?

whymauri• 6 years ago

We've already seen how these algorithms encourage conflict on Twitter and Facebook. The idea of those paradigms moving to my living community, and by proxy to my real, physical life, is scary.

glitcher• 6 years ago

a social network based on proximity and centered around community information is a viable idea, It's just that NextDoor is doing that with our worst instincts

I have only seen a little bit of NextDoor, and please correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems to me to be more of how people are deciding to use the platform as opposed to NextDoor purposely promoting our worst instincts. Do you feel like they really are promoting the most inflammatory posts for the purpose of increasing engagement? (like so many of the other major platforms out there)

For me it is sad to see that there are so many people out there too quick to pass judgement on anyone that looks different in their neighborhood. But so far it feels like another example of how web platforms allow people to be more comfortable in expressing their true feelings, and while often disappointing, is a good reminder of the very different views people around us can hold.

jpindar• 6 years ago

It's not Nextdoor, it's their neighbors.

My Nextdoor has none of the things people are complaining about. Here, the worst thing is arguments about whether we are taking COVID seriously enough or not, but I suppose that is a natural consequence of discussing which businesses are closed etc.

duskwuff2• 6 years ago

Do you feel like they really are promoting the most inflammatory posts for the purpose of increasing engagement?

I don't think it's necessarily intentional, but posts which foster fear (like "I saw a scary black person walking down the street") will naturally invite more engagement from users, and the site may respond to that by promoting those posts over less controversial content (like "my cat is missing").

mc32• 6 years ago

Yeah it’s a double edged sword. On the one hand you know if your neighborhood is getting hit by package thieves, car-break-in’s, etc., on the other hand people walking disheveled in their sweats can get called out.

On the other hand this is a neighborhood app and is used differently in different neighborhoods. Tenderloin vs Nob Hill.

vmception2• 6 years ago

ha I just posted about Nextdoor Tenderloin. I live in a different neighborhood now and its a totally different community, very welcoming while also generally empathic to the desperate people doing actual illegal things and redirecting the angst from housed neighbors towards more productive empathy.

notwhereyouare• 6 years ago

I’m over in Dorchester and holy crap is our next door a mess

cortesoft• 6 years ago

Similar experience for me... I joined when our cat was missing so I could post to see if anyone had seen him.... this is in Los Angeles, and I have been pretty shocked by the racism and classism... I feel like 75% of the posts are things like "I saw a black man walking!" and "someone was SLEEPING in a car! Someone needs to call the cops!"

It is crazy how much everyone assumes all these people are out to get them.

CPLX• 6 years ago

I live in downtown Brooklyn and I’ve never seen any issues of this kind, like at all, even once. I think at least some of this has to do with the people in the area in question.

Baeocystin• 6 years ago

I live in Gilroy, a small town in the bay area. I joined Nextdoor for all of two weeks before I quit in annoyance and frustration.

A typical post:

"OMG Who Is This Suspicious Person!!!"

:: watches video, sees rather bored looking person, driving a UPS truck, wearing a UPS uniform, dropping off a package, then leaving ::

This was 90%+ of what the posts were like. The rest were 'political' screeds so disjointed they were essentially logorrhea. Something about how Nextdoor has shaped their posting methodologies has made even Facebook posts look sane in comparison, and that's saying something.

The added frustration is that real neighborhood watch needs exist. We had some professional thieves roll through our cul-de-sac a few days ago- dozens of people had their cars broken in to, and whatever was in easy reach stolen. The Ring Neighborhood system allowed those of us affected to find who had video of what, and forward it all to the police. That's a real benefit. But it has its own issues.

Social media is a hard problem.

Ghjklov• 6 years ago

One human is complex already. People, groups of humans are even more problematic. Social media is a hard problem because people are hard to get a handle on. And I think that's good. People should be allowed to be skeptical, to have anxieties, and to be able to look out for the interests of their people/community. Just because one Karen saw a suspicious person and wanted to let all her neighbors know to be careful doesn't mean Nextdoor/social media is bad. People looking out for each other is a good thing! You see that all the time in high trust societies where you could even safely leave a bike unattended for a few minutes without fearing that it'll be stolen.

Don't get me wrong though. Nextdoor's program to forward suspicions to the police is the wrong play. No one should be arrested and put at harm's way just because someone was a bit anxious one day.

I just think that we should be nurturing a high trust society, rather than moving to a low trust one where, on the surface everyone is tolerant/accepting but in reality they aren't really thinking about the other people in their community at all. "Not my problem." "Oh no, I can't let myself be bigoted. Who am I to judge the masked man walking around with a chainsaw at midnight? He might just be headed out to trim his garden?"

vmception2• 6 years ago

on the other hand, Tenderloin Nextdoor in San Francisco is hilarious

"oh wow drug dealers in the best neighborhood in the city I can't believe it, but really, did you test the product for accuracy? let us know!"

spaetzleesser• 6 years ago

In my neighborhood it's quite OK and useful. For example people are exchanging information about internet slowness so you know it's not only you that has the problem. The reports about suspicious activity usually make sense, like videos of people checking out someone's porch.

hombre_fatal2• 6 years ago

I think idea of organizing a social network based on proximity and centered around community information is a viable idea

NextDoor and Craigslist and Reddit's /r/{city} communities just prove that it may be viable but it's pretty undesirable. I think it's best to not give the most neurotic, ill people of your community the loudest voice, but these social networks also create this neuroticism and illness.

You also create a scenario (NextDoor especially) where all the sane people are driven out by the crazies. Back when NextDoor was new, after a year it would come up in conversation and sure enough, anyone normal would admit they tried it and had to delete it.

Social media is messing us up. I don't think we're missing some new take on it that's going to make it all better. I think the vestigially tribal parts of our brain make it a non-starter. We need to get back to the face-to-face -- it seems to be the only way we keep in mind that there's a human at the other end of the line, not some nebulous automaton that we craft into everything we hate in the world.

icelancer2• 6 years ago

> I think it's best to not give the most neurotic, ill people of your community the loudest voice.

People say that it's the outliers but the reality is that in many cases, this is the silent majority driving the behavior.

goatinaboat• 6 years ago

I think it's best to not give the most neurotic, ill people of your community the loudest voice, but these social networks also create this neuroticism and illness.

You’ve just described Twitter perfectly.

vector_spaces• 6 years ago

People behaving badly doesn't always imply they have mental illness. In my experience people with and without mental illness can be quick to be suspicious of others, hold prejudices, and involve law enforcement in the face of people just trying to go about their lives

I agree that the behavior being capitalized on here is pathological but using the terms "neuroticism", "illness", and "crazies" here unfairly and wrongly stigmatizes people with mental illness when in practice people with mental illness are more likely to be harmed by these suspicious posts and behavior nextdoor had been encouraging

wespiser_20183• 6 years ago

Social media is messing us up. I don't think we're missing some new take on it that's going to make it all better.

This is a fair point, and one I think is very important to consider. When I wrote the original quote, I was not thinking of another facebook, but rather a platform that would work on issues like providing access to local government meetings, and probably be closer to what we now think of as "journalism". Which the lack of is a major problem in many parts of the country due to the declining newspaper industry.

Small towns and rural America is in trouble, and although it's naive to say there are simple solutions, I am optimistic that it is possible for technology to solve some problems.

dustingetz• 6 years ago

We'll be better at social in 20 years it just takes some practice ... like not smoking cigs ... social is really important, it's letting the people unionize against the state

jimmaswell• 6 years ago

NextDoor has been good for me. There are some dumb posts but whatever, lots of useful stuff too.

octodog• 6 years ago

As a counterpoint, I am apart of a "Good Karma Network" Facebook group centred on the suburb I live in and it is extremely wholesome and pleasant. The posts range from re-homing old furniture, organising exercise groups, posting local PSAs, to recommending dishes at local cafes and restaurants.

There is never any conflict that I can tell of and there certainly aren't dubious posts about "suspicious" characters.

nxpnsv2• 6 years ago

I’ve found the r/city subs i’ve been in has been great. Perhaps depends where you live...

mnky9800n• 6 years ago

I don't think the /r/cities is comparable to nextdoor. In the last nextdoor community I was in people were ready to lynch a guy who was schizophrenic because they decided he was dangerous. They started a pedophile manhunt for an old man who was literally looking for his lost dog. The /r/cities all seem to be removed enough from the immediate local that they didn't feed this sort of vitriol. But I suppose ymmv.

esyir• 6 years ago

Doesn't really seem to work now. Social media turned tribal instincts can readily be turned on "real in person people".

brightball2• 6 years ago

In my neighborhood it’s only been lost pets, HOA questions, neighborhood events and a heads up that people were going door to door in a posted “no soliciting” neighborhood. Also “clean up after your dog” posts.

Haven’t seen any suspicious persons type posts, but we did coordinate the entire neighborhood to help the police after people broke into multiple cars in driveways in ours and the adjacent neighborhood.

It’s been mostly good with the occasional spammy business posting.

MiroF• 6 years ago

we did coordinate the entire neighborhood to help the police

how did this work?

also sounds like a pretty suburban place maybe?

axaxs• 6 years ago

Well, unless it's changed, the big problem is that it seems the first person to sign up is the moderator/leader/whatever. And those are the people with nothing better to do, who subdivide to gain power over some amount of houses. Basically, like the people who try to form HOAs. Most complaints about Nextdoor would be fixed with reasonable moderation.

Also: I think a lot of people who complain about Nextdoor need to reflect on where they chose to live. My little city in KY was perfectly fine. People offering help, lost/found animals, events...standard stuff.

TaylorAlexander• 6 years ago

My understanding is that for this to work everyone has to get in the same room periodically and talk.

Balgair• 6 years ago

For a larger snapshot ND, the BestOfNextDoor twitter account is solid gold : https://twitter.com/bestofnextdoor

The oft-repeated quote of "ND is just Tinder for old racists" makes it sound so lovely.

duxup• 6 years ago

What I find interesting is the type of fear that goes around.

Almost all the fear type nextdoor posts in the areas I've lived in have involved animals and not humans.

Fox, random dog, raccoons and the extremely unlikely but reported none the less....bear sightings.

ab_testing• 6 years ago

I see that you are blaming nextdoor, when nextdoor is just a symptom. The actual issue is that these people are paranoid and scared and marking anything as suspicous. If not for nextdoor, it will be some other app - but the issue will stay the same.

wespiser_20183• 6 years ago

I see that you are blaming nextdoor, when nextdoor is just a symptom.

I am trying to share my observation, and express my disappointment that a company has created a skinner-box engagement loop based on fear and neuroticism. People will always be afraid, but technology should be used to bring out the best qualities in humans, not amplify the worst.

p2hari• 6 years ago

I think idea of organizing a social network based on proximity and centered around community information is a viable idea

Shameless plug: We are exactly working on this and want to bring better community information app without other distractions. Currently only in Denmark.Will be updating the details soon.

However, I agree that the way NextDoor is handling community interactions is really disturbing.

rubyn00bie• 6 years ago

Fuck you, Nextdoor. Not. Enough.

Nextdoor is known to be platform that enables bigotry and perpetuates racial stereotypes. Nextdoor, not forwarding bullshit suspicions to the police, is the least they could do since they created the fucking problem to begin with.

It encourages one to view everyone who you don't immediately recognize as an outsider, causing you to fear them, and then share that fear with others so they too can be afraid. It's absolute madness, and I haven't ever heard a good thing in the real world about Nextdoor. I have had people assume my race incorrectly though, and gleefully admit their racist usage of it not knowing what they were about to say would be considered so fucking awful...

spydum• 6 years ago

I suspect you are projecting too much on their motives. It seemed to me to be a great place to establish neighborhood communities they could advertise to, with the side benefit of opening up communication inside the neighborhood as well. What's unfortunate is how some people choose to communicate and fear monger. I've seen it used both positively and negatively- really depends on the neighbors.

Depending on the privacy agreement, would be very intriguing to see neighborhood sentiment analysis... Maybe pick out those racist neighborhoods to avoid (or join? Maybe you are into homogeneity).

chillacy• 6 years ago

I don't use nextdoor so I don't know, but how much is caused by the platform's design and how much of that is just "these suburbanites are racist"?

Spooky232• 6 years ago

Racism is only one annoying persona.

The big advertisers have been Ring and security companies, so they tend to attract people worried about other people. They suppress things like political posts, so there really isn’t anything to do but worry about lost cats or busybody crap.

js2• 6 years ago

The vast majority of nextdoor posts in my area are people asking whether a snake is a copperhead or not and then arguing over whether or not to kill it. Followed by people complaining about X (speeders, dog poop, roaming cats, etc). Also a lot of folks looking for miss-delivered packages.

It's useful for borrowing a car seat, getting recommendations for plumbers, electricians, etc, advertising extra garden produce we wish to give away, and so forth. Otherwise, I stay off of it.

Also from a technical and UI perspective, the web site is atrocious. It loads terribly slowly on a current generation iPad, constantly tries to route you to its app, makes it way too easy to accidentally interact with a post or comment, defaults to "top posts" instead of "recent activity" and on and on. It's barely any better visiting on a desktop.

I much prefer the sub-reddits, city-data forums, and even FB groups for my area for keeping in touch with what's going around me.

downerending• 6 years ago

Same here, although within the last 24 hours, my neighborhood's chat is starting to look like a Twitter-ish hate-fest. If they don't stop, I'm going to chuck it in the same dumpster as Twitter.

supernova87a• 6 years ago

I think the problem with such tools is that the technology disconnected our societal checks to make sure that such tools are used correctly. Or didn't consider the need for that function at all as this new online capability was created. It was just some developer+PM saying, "what if we offered this?" And it just appeared, a new feature in the world.

Now, maybe I will be downvoted for saying (in this climate), but the ability for people to see something suspicious and do something about it is important. You would have the pendulum swing the other way and have people actively tell themselves to ignore potential crime / bad actors, or be unable to report something legitimate?

But the point is that up to recent years, your interactions with police were not anonymous, and you had to (generally) put your name and reputation (or phone number and your voice) behind things that you asserted were true. There was an element of credibility verification in the reporting.

Today, anonymity on the internet, and the ease of creating false (or biased) reports has unleashed a tidal wave of noise and bad information, with no repercussions (reputation-wise, or cost) to the persons creating it. And the effects are all externalized to those who wrongly come under suspicion.

There are some things that need to have a barrier to being done, and taking it online lowers that barrier. Until we figure out what that caused, and how it's to be handled correctly, it's right that these portals disable the features that are causing us these kinds of societal mistakes -- and we actively should choose to slow down our adoption of things that we don't yet understand the full implications of.

ikeyany• 6 years ago

The ability to report dangerous things to the proper authorities is one of the ways you know you live in a functional society.

That said, this whole topic brings up the question of "At what cost?" We won't see the macroeffects these have on our communities for quite a while. Our base insticts when it comes to how we should react when we see something off, are slowly changing.

jacquesm2• 6 years ago

Hah. East Germans know exactly what this sort of thing will lead to: selective enforcement against those that the police wish to target anyway. Nothing like a bit of good old snitching to the authorities. Too bad if you're not lily white and walking around in a posh - or not so posh - neighborhood past what others think should be your curfew.

Of course, if you are witness to a serious crime you should report it. But if someone waters their lawn, sleeps in their car, or pees in their garden then that's their business and usually not yours so as long as you are not inconvenienced you should mind your own business lest one day the tables are turned and you forget to bring in your garbage container. And that's before we get into reporting people 'walking while black', those things might actually be against a law.

If you're breaking N laws per day think about what the effect would be if those were all enforced. Do not do unto others... And don't give racists even more tools for harassment.

smcl• 6 years ago

One thing I’ve learned over the years is that many people perceive:

- themselves as perfect but making the odd honest mistake every now and then

- others as fundamentally flawed, persistent rule-breakers who Need To Be Punished

Even if they’re broadly the same or worse. This is true on the road, in college or writing code. A lot of people will be unable to look at their own tiny little infractions and see them as equivalent to the flagrant disregard for the rules that they observe in others.

neeeeees• 6 years ago

This sounds like Fundamental Attribution Error: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_attribution_erro...

Analemma_• 6 years ago

Close, but it’s more like “people perceive themselves and their ingroup as perfect but making occasional honest mistakes” and perceive their outgroup as flawed, persistent rule-breakers. And guess who the outgroup tends to be in racially homogeneous neighborhoods.

Proziam• 6 years ago

The way I've always heard it:

We judge others by their actions. We judge ourselves by our intentions.

jariel• 6 years ago

I doubt this.

When people see others in the neighbourhood that fit a 'pattern they might associate with criminality' this has nothing to do with viewing 'others that need to be punished' rather just a fearful view of difference, and probably lack of exposure to people that creates some low-key bigotry. Throw in some neuroticism and too much free time, possibly some mental health issues and it's a problem.

jackcosgrove• 6 years ago

I just logged into NextDoor today after years of inactivity because I wanted to see if there were resources about how to dispose of bulky trash items.

Wow, what a mess! Standard lost dog fare, but also a lot of busybodies nitpicking about neighbors' municipal code violations, suspicions of people who don't look like they "fit" the neighborhood, and general bickering in every comment thread.

NextDoor seems like a good idea, until you execute and it turns out the power users are busybodies holed up at home who have way too much time to micromanage the goings-on in their neighborhoods.

Spooky232• 6 years ago

My neighborhood in Nextdoor was actually pretty non-toxic until recently. It has become overrun with lost/found/who owns this cat posts and people complaining about fireworks and dog trauma. (Since we had riots fireworks have been a constant presence)

neonate• 6 years ago

https://archive.vn/hFSCI

chasd00• 6 years ago

heh yeah i get lots of "beware of this suspicious person" messages that turn out to be hte mail man on Next Door. However, it is very useful for lost pets. IMO they need to expand on that utility, i routinely see lost/found pet posts were the owner and pet are eventually re-united via Next Door.

Grimm1• 6 years ago

Nextdoor just seems like another 1984 esq system especially because of their ties to the state through the Police. This will never be making its way into my home. It honestly astounds me that people buy into these things especially with potentially petty neighbors you're one bad day away from being the person who "doesn't belong" in the neighborhood.

mrfusion• 6 years ago

When will Ring step up?

int_19h3• 6 years ago

Some of the things on Nextdoor remind me of "Snow Crash" sometimes.

"Fairlanes, Inc. is laying new ones all the time. Have to bulldoze lots of neighborhoods to do it, but those seventies and eighties developments exist to be bulldozed, right? No sidewalks, no schools, no nothing. Don’t have their own police force — no immigration control — undesirables can walk right in without being frisked or even harassed. Now a Burbclave, that’s the place to live. A city-state with its own constitution, a border, laws, cops, everything."

"MetaCops Unlimited is the official peacekeeping force of White Columns, and also of The Mews at Windsor Heights, The Heights at Bear Run, Cinnamon Grove, and The Farms of Cloverdelle. They also enforce traffic regulations on all highways and byways operated by Fairlanes, Inc. ... MetaCops’ main competitor, WorldBeat Security, handles all roads belonging to Cruiseways, plus has worldwide contracts with Dixie Traditionals, Pickett’s Plantation, Rainbow Heights (check it out — two apartheid Burbclaves and one for black suits), Meadowvale on the [insert name of river] and Brickyard Station. WorldBeat is smaller than MetaCops, handles more upscale contracts, supposedly has a bigger espionage arm — though if that’s what people want, they just talk to an account rep at the Central Intelligence Corporation. And then there’s The Enforcers — but they cost a lot and don’t take well to supervision. It is rumored that, under their uniforms, they wear T-shirts bearing the unofficial Enforcer coat of arms: a fist holding a nightstick, emblazoned with the words SUE ME. ... These Burbclaves! These city-states! So small, so insecure, that just about everything, like not mowing your lawn, or playing your stereo too loud, becomes a national security issue."

alance• 6 years ago

As someone who is trying to run a vaguely similar service (streetmates.net) I'm wondering how communities can be guided to be constructive and pleasant.

Or maybe people are just people, pleasant and unpleasant and everything else, and it can't really be helped?

It seems like putting something on the front page like "hey don't be a racist busy-body" isn't really enough. And at the other end of the extreme you've got Facebook employing organisations that filter sensitive content - with fairly horrific outcomes for the individuals who do the monitoring.

HackerNews is a pretty good example of getting a certain standard of behaviour out of people en masse. I wonder what the secret sauce was?

pcvarmint• 6 years ago

See something, say something

Nextdoor ends its program for forwarding suspicions to police

Related Stories