Try Clojure

by raju • 16 years ago

140 57 16 years ago

ikitat• 16 years ago

What! No Paredit?

Looking better and better. Someone with design chops should fork the repo and give them a good logo and a color treatment.

ollysb• 16 years ago

Having the tutorial right there is a great improvement. Looking forward to working through it as it expands.

Rayne12• 16 years ago

Lau Jensen and I worked pretty hard on the new layout. And I'll add your damned logo! Just give me time. ;)

inanedrivel• 16 years ago

Without emacs and its plethora of hellspawn requirements for a decent clojure environment, I just don't feel comfortable!!

Grats on a nice web-based repl though :)

ecuzzillo3• 16 years ago

Yeah, yesterday I decided I wanted to do something with Lisp again, and I figured that Clojure was the hot new kid on the block, so I should use that, and now it's tonight and I still don't have SLIME hooked up to Clojure, presumably because there's no actual guide to anything, and any howto that anybody made is guaranteed to be out of date almost before they post it.

Clojure is really appealing otherwise, though, as lisps go.

Edit (2x): I had a statement here of my particular problem at the moment, but then it changed, so I deleted it.

waterlesscloud• 16 years ago

You're going about it differently than I did (haven't gotten around to leiningen yet), but I found the top google results for linking emacs to clojure were woefully out of date. I'm a newbie to both emacs and clojure, so I couldn't figure out what I needed to do to correct for the old info.

I gave up on that route and installed elpa on emacs, which I then used to install slime, swank, and clojure. Works great!

jdminhbg• 16 years ago

I had a similar problem, and by far the easiest thing for me has been:

1) Add lein-swank to the dev-dependencies of the project I'm working on (i.e., add this - :dev-dependencies [[leiningen/lein-swank "1.1.0"]] - to your project.clj file

2) lein deps

3) lein swank

4) M-x slime-connect in emacs, then accept the default host/port

edit: Blogged it http://increasinglyfunctional.com/2010/05/18/my-swank-clojur...

weavejester2• 16 years ago

There's a short guide for getting Emacs set up on the Clojure Assembla page:

http://www.assembla.com/wiki/show/clojure/Getting_Started_wi...

The Assembla wiki is a recent attempt at fixing problem of finding up-to-date 'getting started' documentation for Clojure.

jluxenberg• 16 years ago

Neat! FYI, the editor is fairly busted on FF 3.6.3. Key repeat for arrow keys does not work, and paste is broken. Not sure what they're using, but it would also be nice if it supported readline-style navigation (i.e. M-f, M-b, C-e, C-a, etc).

Rayne12• 16 years ago

It uses the same thing that tryhaskell.org uses. I was wondering about paste myself, but I suppose it's better for learning, just not for practicality.

The console works fine on my FF 3.6.3.

jacquesm2• 16 years ago

Man that teddy bear scares me off, I'd hate to make a typo and crash someones server.

What kind of precautions against newbie messes are there ?

tlrobinson• 16 years ago

Looks like it uses this for sandboxing: http://github.com/Licenser/clj-sandbox

Rayne12• 16 years ago

Licenser (Heinz) and I have another project called clj-sandbox that provides sandboxing for try-clojure and sexpbot in #clojure. You're safe.

jacquesm2• 16 years ago

Ok, cool. Especially for newbie clojure coders hitting errm, 'involuntary infinite recursion' is pretty easy.

And I'd hate to cause a melt-down :)

braindead_in• 16 years ago

Can't navigate with arrows. Frustrating.

stuntmouse• 16 years ago

Great work.

Please hook this up to ymacs!

Also, the highlighting in the tutorials makes the code difficult to read.

ggruschow2• 16 years ago

Nice work.

Assuming you're trying to advocate Clojure, I'd recommend changing your tutorial to make things look easy (as opposed to highlighting gotchas). I recommend doing math examples first. Show how it makes a good calculator, but avoid discussion of ratios. That's (unnecessarily) confusing.. just like everything in the hello world example starting from the nil output on.

By the time I got to the sequence page, I just hit next to see if there was anything else of interest. I'd already gotten the strong impression this new language would just make my life harder. Worst of all though was when I flubbed up and typed (/4 3) rather than (/ 4 3).

jf3• 16 years ago

The person who submitted this link isn't the author of TryClojure.

http://tryclj.licenser.net/ and http://www.try-clojure.org/ both point to the same IP. And both domains are registered to Heinz Gies - who I assume is the original author of TryClojure.

devin• 16 years ago

Raynes and Licenser (Heinz) have both worked on their own version of tryclojure but are collaborating on this version if I understand correctly. I'm not sure how they'll feel about this being posted early, but either way, pretty neat.

Rayne12• 16 years ago

Actually, I'm mostly the author of try-clojure. Heinz hosts it for me and collaborates, but I'm the majority author.

Rayne12• 16 years ago

I don't know if you noticed, but I tried to be very explicit about the fact that the tutorial is nowhere near finished. I wrote that up in 1 hour yesterday. I'm well aware that it needs filling in with less difficult stuff. I intend to start serious work on it today.

Also, I'm trying to get Michael Fogus (author of Joy of Clojure) to write the tutorial. If he decides to do so, I can almost promise you quality. ;)

ggruschow2• 16 years ago

I just meant to be offering constructive feedback. The tutorial was useful for me. It's certainly way better than the tutorial I had before you wrote it! It's pretty impressive for an hour of work.

zenocon2• 16 years ago

Nicely done. Would be nice to support copy/paste into the editor. Get rid of the dark grey background on code snippets in the tutorial -- very difficult to read.

Having REPL inline with the tutorial is great...wish someone would build something similar for Haskell.

lgas• 16 years ago

http://tryhaskell.org/

zenocon2• 16 years ago

Thanks for that. The missing link here is having the tutorial and the editor together for the maximum user benefit. What would be really cool is if the online copy of RWH had this editor embedded in it. What would be even cooler is if it had some basic menu features that allowed you to save module files, compile them and execute them along with the HUGS/GHCI integration.

jf3• 16 years ago

I'm keeping a list of REPs and REPLs: http://joel.franusic.com/Online-REPs-and-REPLs - looks like there are 4 for Haskell.

Rayne12• 16 years ago

I'm still experimenting with code snippet colors.

jared314• 16 years ago

Is anyone embedding Bespin for idea's similar to this?

jf3• 16 years ago

ideone.com has an API. Would be cool to see those two together.

gcv• 16 years ago

A Clojure REPL that works on iPhone and iPad platforms. Will the wonders of web application delivery never cease? :)

chc• 16 years ago

Does it? I couldn't get it to execute anything on my iPhone. Or delete anything I'd written for that matter.

(Not knocking it. A lot of things don't work quite right on touch-only platforms. Try Haskell doesn't work either IIRC. Just a matter of testing and debugging I'm sure.)

Rayne12• 16 years ago

TryHaskell is powered by Chris Done's jquery-console. So is TryClojure. Bugs in TryHaskell transfer to TryClojure by default.

icefox• 16 years ago

When hitting the up arrow it should go to the last line, not the first.

Rayne12• 16 years ago

That's a problem with Chris Done (tryhaskell.org)'s jquery-console. I believe he's still working on proper history.

zephjc• 16 years ago

Awesome! Also noticed that it retains your session (at least for a while) even if you close the browser windown. It seems however to give up when trying to write code on multiple lines.

DenisM• 16 years ago

copy-paste broken in ff36 on snow leopard.

peropaal• 16 years ago

That's cool, only thing left now; in the tutorial, change the color scheme (from black on darkgray) to something a little more legible, and make the examples clickable, so I don't have to retype them in the repl.

Rayne12• 16 years ago

Still working on those colors, but I'm not sure about making examples clickable. It's hard to learn if you don't pay attention to examples. :p

Pistos2• 16 years ago

This only halfway works in Opera [10.53 on Linux]. You can type, but then if you fill the output area, only autoscrolls down after you press Enter. But otherwise, you can't see what you're typing while you type it. And then focus goes all out of whack if you scroll the tutorial, or use up arrow and down arrow. Sometimes it accesses the readline history, sometimes it scrolls the screen, and seems somewhat arbitrary. Some of this could be blamed on the betaness of Opera, though.

Avshalom2• 16 years ago

This isn't really a Clojure specific question but is there any benefit to making 'if' a special form? Meaning you can't do:

(map if [true false true] [1 1 1] [2 2 2])

not that I can think of any reason why you'd want to do that (specifically) but Picolisp, Factor, REBOL and I'm sure a couple other languages implement if as a normal function. To take an example from some edition of programming clojure:

(defmacro unless [expr form] (list 'if expr nil form))

in factor:

: unless ( ? quote -- ) swap [ drop ] [ call ] if ; inline

no macro needed to futz with if's.

Does it have any advantages or is it just one of those things that "that's just how it's always been"?

Rayne12• 16 years ago

Well, it's actually impossible to write if as a function in Clojure.

Avshalom2• 16 years ago

I think it's impossible to write if as a function in anything, I'm pretty sure that at some point you need a branching primitive, but the if the VM uses and the if exposed to the user don't have to be the same thing. Like I said though, it's not a Clojure specific question, CL and Scheme both use a special form for if as well. Even if it can't be done in a JVM language it can be done. I'm just curious if there's any particular reason it isn't done, like being way easier for a compiler/interpreter to optimize or something or if it's mostly historical.

geocar2• 16 years ago

Making "if" a special form means that it can short-circuit, and I'd rather write

    (if x big_expensive_expression y)

than

    (funcall (if x (lambda () big_expensive_expression) (lambda () y)))

gecko• 16 years ago

You mind it mostly because the Lisp funcall/lambda syntax is complex. Contrast with Smalltalk, which lacks special forms, and does use lambdas to get short circuiting:

    someBoolean ifTrue: [ 'it was true' ] ifFalse: [ 'it was false' ]

Brackets introduce lambdas. I don't find this syntax clunky, and while I've never wanted to map ifTrue:/ifFalse: before, it's nice to be able to write your own special-form-like operators this way.

anonymousDan• 16 years ago

What about for lazy languages such as Haskell? I guess you get short circuiting by default there no?

weavejester2• 16 years ago

You could have 'if' as a function, but it would mean you'd have to encase any non-literal condition in a function:

    (if (zero? x)
      0
      #(dec x))

To me, this seems a rather counter-intuitive step with very little benefit. People rarely need to use "if" as a function, so having "if" as a macro optimizes for the common case.

Try Clojure

Related Stories