Show HN: Use Slack for Everything

by JCBarry • 11 years ago

60 45 11 years ago

I'm not sure if this service specifically requires full access permissions or not, but I do know a ton of these (awesome/neat) plugins like this popping up require a company to give the plugin full write/read permissions. And for that reason, it's stopped our company from being able to use them.

I'd be curious to see how many companies would actually allow a 3rd party service to have that full amount of permissions. It's sort of like GitHub and how some services require the access to private repos. I'm not sure of a solution, but am just curious how it really holds back awesome services like this when companies don't feel comfortable giving it the level of access it has to have (but may not use that full access).

lwhalen2• 11 years ago

Run an IRC server, configure a hubot. Yes, 'cloud'-based chat is pretty, but it's a new coat of paint over something that's been around for decades (IRC). For a company less than several thousand people, running your own singleton IRC server is about as complicated as setting up a basic 3-tier web application (i.e., a little fiddly, but not hard at all)

danpalmer2• 11 years ago

Clients on the other hand are somewhat lacking for IRC.

We use Slack in a company of ~30, and while all the devs could easily use IRC, most of the rest of the company would struggle with it, and certainly wouldn't be able to communicate in the wide variety of ways (uploaded files, images/gifs, videos, code snippets, etc) that they do now. Slack is great at making all those rich media types 'just work', and while it was possible with plugins to some IRC clients, the UX was prohibitively bad in my experience.

oakesm9• 11 years ago

Yes it's not too hard or too different, but have you ever tried getting non-developers to use IRC? Finding a desktop client is confusing (which one is best being the first question) and even basic setup can be daunting (servers, ports, channels etc).

Slack, Hipchat and others however can be easily set up and used by pretty much anyone in a company. IRC is great for companies which only have very technically proficient employees, however that's not most companies...

xena• 11 years ago

Why not https://matrix.org?

snuxoll2• 11 years ago

Compliance is an annoying issue with IRC. With Slack, Lync, or 99% of Jabber servers out there I can log every communication that takes place (outside of people using something like OTR with Jabber) - I can set up an IRC bot in every channel to log group chats, and maybe somehow disable private messages, but it's a pain in the butt to deal with IRC where compliance is a big deal (I work in healthcare).

I've often toyed with the idea of writing an IRCD with logging built in that drops all CTCP setup messages, but it's a huge hassle.

arihant• 11 years ago

It's a slash command, should only need a webhook AFAIK.

JCBarry3• 11 years ago

Hey there! This is a great point and something we recognized when developing operator. We wanted to make a service that didn't expose your entire chat to a third-party service.

The OAuth scopes operator asks for are the following: chat:write:bot - so we can post to your channel operator's response. commands - to install the commands. users:read - so we can get a bit more information about you (name, team permissions, etc).

We even toyed with the idea of eliminating the "users:read" to be as minimally invasive as possible.

vineet7kumar• 11 years ago

There's a minor typo in the About section. It says "...We use Slack all the time wanted to...".

JCBarry3• 11 years ago

Thanks!

nickjackson• 11 years ago

Should also move your CSS include to the head.

d0m• 11 years ago

Looks like risky business to me since this is exactly what Slack is trying to do (Marketplace for commands)

tarr11• 11 years ago

Yeah, this already exists. Slack hasn't added many commands to their marketplace, but if this is at all successful, they will.

Don't see how this lives as part of the Slack ecosystem. Maybe their goal is to become standalone.

Aloha• 11 years ago

or they wont because it would add complexity to their product for features few customers need?

bdcravens2• 11 years ago

Will we have the inevitable Twitter moment when Slack closes things up, and it becomes a crisis of unfairness for companies that built upon another?

kedean• 11 years ago

I'm going to say yes. I thought it was common knowledge at this point not to base your entire service on the good will of another service? They're also banking on Slack not changing their API without telling them.

zyxley• 11 years ago

FYI, on iPhone this shows up at maybe 2/3rds width of the screen with the rest as white space.

joemaller13• 11 years ago

What happened to the website icon fonts? They work in Chrome, but are giant Times New Roman text on Safari, both desktop and Mobile.

joemaller13• 11 years ago

Looks like they trusted Google's recommendation and used WOFF2 which doesn't work anywhere but Chrome and Firefox.

- http://google.github.io/material-design-icons/#icon-font-for...

- http://caniuse.com/#feat=woff2

JCBarry3• 11 years ago

You nailed it! Fixed. :)

dominotw• 11 years ago

I've never used slack but how does it compare to hipchat's new connect api?

https://developer.atlassian.com/blog/2015/12/going-way-beyon...

rrggrr• 11 years ago

We left hipchat for slack for several reasons. First, we saved some money. There were more integrations for slack. The result has been mixed with my more technical users embracing slack, and my less technical users revolting. Hipchat is easier on the eyes and the UI is more intuitive. Both have a long way to go.

There are too many chat clients around and far too many methods to communicate period. Aggregation is badly needed.

taurath• 11 years ago

Aggregation is badly needed in the whole of technology, but big corporations have all decided that having proprietary cables, closed APIs and locked-in platforms is better for their bottom line than what would be good for the consumer. Also open source/free software advocates are pretty terrible at making cohesive user experiences.

When it was AIM/YIM/MSN, etc, Trillian and Pidgin came in and made the experience usable. Now its Gchat, Telegram, Hipchat and Slack. Some of these have XMPP interfaces (all?) but frankly both companies will keep their APIs as closed as possible because they want to make money on their own platform.

nikolay• 11 years ago

You saved money switching to Slack how?

davexunit• 11 years ago

Remember the time you could already do all of this with IRC?

criddell• 11 years ago

This is neat, but I guess I don't really understand the problem this is solving.

The company I work for uses Slack and I like it a lot. However, I've never found myself wishing that I could get a stock quote (or do a trade!), map an address, or play hangman there. Similarly, I think I could do a lot of that stuff from Emacs, but I never have. I use Emacs to edit text and I use Slack to chat.

It might be because of the number of times I've been burned by plugins that break after I upgrade the host application, but I'm a little conservative when it comes to extensions and plugins. I tend to stick to default settings. The Slack instance we use has only one integration enabled - Giphy (animated gif responses).

For the people here that are excited about this, is there a function in particular that is a killer function for you?

ksenzee• 11 years ago

The stock quote and hangman plugins are really just demos. Where services like this really shine is when you integrate them with your existing systems. Starting a Jenkins build from your Slack channel is pretty nifty.

nixgeek• 11 years ago

But this would need setting up to interact with Jenkins? Assuming yes, at that point, why not just hop on over to the Slack App Directory and pick up something there?

e.g. https://slack.com/apps/A0F7VRFKN-jenkins-ci

pmlnr• 11 years ago

Welcome to the world of IRC bots.

lordnacho• 11 years ago

Heh, can I use this as my bash shell? It would actually be useful to have my bash on one of my VMs in a chatroom where I can discuss things with a colleague.

fourstar• 11 years ago

No way in hell this specifically will take off. Slack will integrate this eventually (given their new App marketplace).

sgibat• 11 years ago

why limit this to slack? make it a general purpose text command workflow. terminals, email, anything.

mcantelon• 11 years ago

Slack mania reminds me of Twitter mania before Twitter decided to throw out the sharecroppers.

Show HN: Use Slack for Everything

Related Stories