HN user

JCBarry

43 karma
Posts4
Comments9
View on HN

Tradier | Frontend and Backend Engineers | Remote (US Only) | Full Time (Salary: $90 - $125k)

Tradier is a cloud-based financial services provider that offers a technology and brokerage platform to businesses and individual investors. We provide API solutions for businesses to integrate trading and market data into their platforms as well as a self-directed retail trading platform used by thousands of customers every day. Tradier’s platform satisfies over 1 billion API calls and executes 300+ thousand orders per month to meet our customer needs.

Senior Frontend Engineer - https://angel.co/company/tradier/jobs/1457448-senior-fronten...

Senior Backend Engineer - https://angel.co/company/tradier/jobs/1457449-senior-backend...

You can also send us a note at techhires@tradier.com and mention that you found this post on HN.

Sorry for the delayed reply, I wanted to get confirmation from our brokerage team before posting.

Tradier Brokerage (https://brokerage.tradier.com) can open individual accounts for New Zealand residents and API access comes standard with every account (including market data). You can place orders for US-based equities and options and we offer competitive pricing models for all traders.

If you have any questions, you can email service@tradierbrokerage.com or call 980-272-3880.

Full disclosure, I work at Tradier.

FWIW, Wirecutter (and sister site Sweethome) were purchased by NYTimes in 2016.

From the about on their site (https://thewirecutter.com/about/): "Do your affiliate commissions make you biased?

Up front: Our writers and editors are never made aware of which companies may have established affiliate relationships with our business team prior to making their picks. If readers choose to buy the products we recommend as a result of our research, analysis, interviews, and testing, our work is often (but not always) supported through an affiliate commission from the _retailer_ when they make a purchase. If readers return their purchases because they’re dissatisfied or the recommendation is bad, we make nothing. There’s no incentive for us to pick inferior products or respond to pressure from manufacturers—in fact, it’s quite the opposite. We think that’s a pretty fair system that keeps us committed to serving our readers first.

The most important thing to us is the trust we have from readers. If we were to recommend something because we are biased or lazy, readers like you wouldn’t support our work. We also invite you to fact-check our pieces, which carefully outline the time, logic, and energy spent researching, interviewing experts, and testing the gear. Often, this takes dozens—sometimes even hundreds—of hours. Each guide plainly lays out all the evidence for why we made our picks so you can judge for yourself."

I think the distinction that this is affiliate marketing for the retailers -- not the product manufacturers themselves -- is an important one to make. Also, I think their path of separating business from editorial is entirely sensible for a NYTimes company.

That being said, reviews (and review sites) always fall under "buyer beware" in my mind (I once read a 1 star review of a DVD player stating that it gave it 1 star because it wasn't a VHS player...seriously).

Hey there! This is a great point and something we recognized when developing operator. We wanted to make a service that didn't expose your entire chat to a third-party service.

The OAuth scopes operator asks for are the following: chat:write:bot - so we can post to your channel operator's response. commands - to install the commands. users:read - so we can get a bit more information about you (name, team permissions, etc).

We even toyed with the idea of eliminating the "users:read" to be as minimally invasive as possible.