SymphonyOS – Light, Friendly, and Useful

http://www.symphonyos.com/

by nikolay • 11 years ago

77 45 11 years ago

symphonyos.com

mixmax• 11 years ago

It's a little light on details.

Is this related to the symphony framework in any way, or is it just a naming coincidence?

agumonkey• 11 years ago

Name collision I believe, there's a russian language demo on youtube. It seems to me as a tiny fltk based WM to fit the current UX trends without having a "heavy" DE like Gnome3.

dangrossman• 11 years ago

The PHP framework is Symfony, not Symphony.

ryanq_do10• 11 years ago

It is a coincidence. SymphonyOS pre-dates the Symfony framework by almost a year. There are several projects out there in different spaces that are named Symphony

isxek• 11 years ago

Any torrents we can use? I'd rather not get it through a huge HTTP download.

infinityplus1• 11 years ago

use Burnbit.com

mikegioia• 11 years ago

I'm downloading it to try in a VM, but this website has almost 0 information on it. Where are the screenshots? FAQ? Where is any information about what this is or why I should use it?

The amount of time it would take to add this info must be a pittance compared to the dev hours they put into the OS!

pidg• 11 years ago

There's a little more in the wiki entry for Mezzo: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mezzo_%28desktop_environment%2...

Looks like it challenges elements of the desktop metaphor. The white paper (from 2005) on the ideas behind Mezzo explains a bit more: ftp://ftp.netlabs.org/pub/voyager/docs/MezzoGreypaper.pdf

johnchristopher• 11 years ago

I remember Mezzo from that time. I found the ideas interesting but I couldn't understand why they couldn't plug them into an existing WM via plug-ins.

ORioN63• 11 years ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symphony_OS

methyl• 11 years ago

If it's as friendly as the website, there is still plenty to do there.

ryanq_do10• 11 years ago

Unfortunately SymphonyOS is a one-person project right now and has been for a long time. My focus has been on the codebase and the website which I will admit is crap was put together in one evening. Currently I am in the middle of a complete rewrite of the desktop environment with a new release coming in January. Personally, I would not have submitted it to HN with the website in it's current state but was surprised this morning when a co-worker told me it was on the front page

jbssm• 11 years ago

I fail to see how a desktop UI based on HTML5 can be marketed as "light".

ank_the_elder3• 11 years ago

Absolutely. If anything, it should be tight, native code with little bells and whistles and tuned for speed. HTML5, its DOM model and Javascript are hardly fit for embedded / old / constrained environments.

willismichael• 11 years ago

Wow, I remember hearing about this project over a decade ago, and liking some of the UI concepts. I followed the progress on the website for a little while, and then it seemed to stall, so I mostly forgot about it. As others have mentioned here, the website is unclear. What's going on with this? Is it progressing again?

ryanq_do10• 11 years ago

I am the sole developer/maintainer of SymphonyOS these days and it showing up on HN today is a bit of a suprise since it's been several months since a public release.

Development is progressing albeit slowly since my day job takes up most of my time. I am currently in the middle of a rewrite of the desktop environment making changes like moving from FVWM to openbox and rewriting some Perl code that has been around in one form or another since 2004 in Ruby. I am hoping to have a new release out in January :)

perlgeek• 11 years ago

Is this based on one of the popular linux distributions? If yes, which?

keithpeter6• 11 years ago

Currently Debian (Wheezy according to author of distro in this discussion) in future Ubuntu

sgt• 11 years ago

There is remarkably little information on the website. I don't really want to download it without at least some indication that it's going to be worth my time. Is it just a modified fvwm running in Debian?

ryanq_do10• 11 years ago

The currently available release is Debian based utilizing FVWM along with tint2 and a custom launcher written using HTML5 and WebKit. It's worth trying out in a VM or as a LiveDVD. I am currently in the process of doing a complete rewrite of most of the Desktop environment, replacing some very old Perl pieces with shiny new Ruby ones.

david-given3• 11 years ago

tl;dr: it's a Debian derivative. (I could be wrong. The wikipedia page is very mangled, and the website is entirely content free.)

It looks like it mainly exists as a platform for Mezzo, a desktop environment. I skimmed the design document; it's painfully opinionated, and keeps repeating the tired old cliché that users can't handle configuration options and we should make their lives easier but not letting them change anything...

ryanq_do10• 11 years ago

The design document is 11 years old. Symphony has been a solo side project for the last 6-7 years with a release once or twice a year. There are a few more recent updates on the project's facebook page including screenshots of the new build in progress. https://www.facebook.com/SymphonyOS/

david-given3• 11 years ago

Are there any videos of the new Mezzo in action?

It occurs to me that my post was unduly dismissive. I totally believe that most modern UIs are horribly broken, and I completely sympathise with the 'burn it all down!' approach. But forcing everybody to change their workflow because reasons is, I believe, not it. (Though I'm willing to be persuaded otherwise.)

tracker1• 11 years ago

Silly question, the site notes the OS works on a low-memory platform, but the only download seems to be x64... Any plans for other release platforms rPI, oPI, etc?

andrewthetechie• 11 years ago

I work with the maintainer of Symphony and it is still "alive".

keithpeter6• 11 years ago

Perhaps you could find a volunteer with a little time to just add a list of packages and functions available from the live image to the Web site?

That would help the distro collectors to decide if this is interesting or not.

ryanq_do10• 11 years ago

Distrowatch has a partial list here: http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=symphony

Symphony showing up on the front page of HN was a total surprise to me today. As a sole developer my focus right now is on the new build and next month's release. I agree that the site is way to sparse and could be much better (it was thrown together in one evening) but focusing on the site would only take away from the limited time I have available to work on the distro itself. If after the January release I am able to get a few more developers involved I would love to improve the site, documentation and community around the project.

qwertyuiop924• 11 years ago

Yay! Another F*cking linux distro to learn about! Linux distros may not be as common as JS frameworks, but they're almost there. Just install Arch and have done with it, people. It's like having your own distro, but without all the annoying bits.

keithpeter6• 11 years ago

Quote from Wikipedia page about the OS

"At first, Symphony OS was based on Knoppix. Since its May 2006 release it is no longer based on Knoppix, but rather on Debian unstable, and features a functional hard drive installer."

Debian Sid is viable as the basis for desktop use, but there can be issues now and again and they can persist for a week or two. Just wondering at the target market for this one.

Always fun to do a dist-upgrade on anything Debian derived to see what happens...

ryanq_do10• 11 years ago

The current release available on the website is based on Debian Wheezy and was released in January. A new release, with a completely re-written desktop, based on Ubuntu will be coming out next month.

The wikipedia page is out of date in many places

destinyislands• 11 years ago

What's your opinion of Arch vs Ubuntu? I've done Ubuntu for servers but haven't spent much time with Linux as a personal OS

keithpeter6• 11 years ago

Disclaimer: I'm a civilian. I just use Linux on a couple of laptops.

Arch is a rolling distro with fairly recent applications. Updates most days. Applications and system files stay in testing for a period then get pushed out. Very occasional breakage. Installer is bare-bones and uses linux commands a lot.

Ubuntu is a 'staged' distro as you well know. I imagine you were using Long Term Support versions of Ubuntu on your servers (10.04, 12.04, 14.04 and so on). The same applies to desktops so 14.04 has pretty stable packages. Ubuntu have announced application upgrades within the LTS period recently. The intermediate releases are supported for 9 months and will therefore have applications nearer to the most recent stable. Not too many updates once you get out of the immediate release period.

You might want to have a look at Debian. Unstable is not as quick as Arch with updated applications &c but pretty close. Stable is pretty stable for a couple of years at a time. Repository is huge.

riyadparvez• 11 years ago

Please not another Linux distro.

everfree• 11 years ago

Which distro, in your opinion, is 100% perfect and can't be improved on?

ank_the_elder3• 11 years ago

FreeBSD :)

fak3r• 11 years ago

I was very interested in this back in the day, in fact, I wrote a HOWTO to get the desktop bit run under Ubuntu: https://fak3r.com/2006/01/31/howto-mezzo-desktop-on-ubuntu/

I'm sure that's not going to work anymore, but I got a lot of questions and comments about that post, there was significant interest. Here's hoping a new release comes out in January and people can try it out.

SymphonyOS – Light, Friendly, and Useful

Related Stories