HN user
zeech
We don't even have configurable search engines from the settings anymore
It's annoying, but you can still toggle `browser.urlbar.update2.engineAliasRefresh` to true and it will restore the add/edit/remove buttons for search engines.
Moka pots don't make espresso though. True espresso requires ~9 bars of pressure to make. Moka pots can create at max 1.5 bars (though optimally it would hover between 0.5 and 1 bar).
So while they make very good, rich, full-bodied coffee, it's just not espresso.
Are LGBTQ people at a higher risk for suicide?
There was actually a study done on this [0] that found LGBTQ youth are around four times as likely to attempt suicide compared to their non-LGBTQ peers.
I went looking for a 'new' pager a couple years back and settled on this [0]. I've since gone back to `less` since it got annoying jumping between systems and having different pagers, but when I used it it was quite nice.
Whoops, nice catch - comment edited.
Graphene already uses binary blobs (though one can disable them if they want). Info at [0].
[0] https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/27068-grapheneos-security-p...
Good point. It's a good thing that, say, Google is notoriously independent from the US government, and has never had any ties to it whatsoever.
Reminds me of the classic Sludgefest [0]. (For the uninitiated it's a collection of Chipmunks records slowed until the voices sound roughly human.)
"Ultraprocessed" is at least a tangible definition
The Nova system's classification for UPFs seems to be what the majority of people who refer to them use as a definition.
In the Nova system, there are four main groups of food:
- Group one has 'unprocessed or minimally processed' foods, e.g. grains and fresh fruits.
- Group two has 'processed culinary ingredients'. These include foods that use naturally-derived ingredients like salt and flour.
- Group three has foods that combine the first two, like salted nuts, and can also include things with some added preservatives or flavourings.
- Group four is ultraprocessed foods. These are defined as industrially-manufactured foods made with multiple ingredients (typically multiple oils, sugars, fats, and salt) and ingredients with minimal culinary use.
The issue with group four is that it's far broader than it should be. For instance, under the Nova system sparkling water is a UPF because it's carbonated, and carbonation is considered a chemical additive. It also classifies anything with, say, Stevia as a UPF even though it's a perfectly safe artificial sweetener. It's broad enough that it covers tofu, various cheeses, and various breads, to name a few.
It also ignores the actual nutritional content of the foods (which the original Nova paper touches on, I think, specifically saying it's not meant to be used for nutrient profiling).
How would you prove that a given food item is "hyperpalatable"?
I was recently looking at a study about this [0]. The three criterion that have been found to best define hyperpalatability are as follows:
(1) Foods with over 25% of calories from fat and more than 0.3% sodium by weight
(2) Foods with over 20% of calories from fat and more than 20% of calories from simple sugars
(3) Foods with over 40% of calories from carbs (not counting dietary fibre and simple sugars) and more than 0.2% sodium by weight
As another commenter pointed out, those are hyperpalatable foods, not 'ultraprocessed foods'.
Besides, 'ultraprocessed food' itself is and has always been a useless buzzword (buzzphrase?).
Even if you do eat them, there's no evidence (or I suppose I should say no evidence yet) of microplastics being harmful when ingested. Nanoplastics, on the other hand, have been found to impact animal embryos and cells grown in labs.
Very cool project! When I was regularly using a multiplexer on my personal machines, I did something similar with `abduco` [0] for session management and `dvtm` [1] for the actual multiplexing.
I agree that many hyperpalatable foods are ultraprocessed so that they can be made more cheaply, but I don't think that's reason enough to say that the, uh, process of processing foods is entirely aligned with the concept of hyperpalatability.
This article equates ultraprocessed foods and hyperpalatable foods (foods designed to make people want to eat them more). While many hyperpalatable foods are classified as ultraprocessed, simply being hyperpalatable does not mean it's ultraprocessed.
Worth noting that the Nova food classificationvsysten (which this article references) completely disregards the actual nutritional content of foods.
For a good primer on a lot of the misconceptions around UPFs, check out [0].
[0] https://www.harvardmagazine.com/research/harvard-ultraproces...
You can also insert the plunger a small amount (maybe half an inch or so, if that) and pull it back up a tiny bit for a similar effect.
Oop, somehow missed that this was posted yesterday: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46340862
I've found lnk [0] to be a nice tool for this. Similar to GNU Stow as another comment mentioned, but plays a bit nicer with git (and, in my opinion, is nicer to use).
Edit: just remembered there was a good comparison of lnk and stow on the HN discussion of lnk from a few months back [1].
I can't speak to it driving a monitor over USB-C as I don't use one, but I'm currently running 15.0-RELEASE on a refurbished Dell Latitude 7280 that has worked flawlessly out of the box so far.
Somebody else did a nice writeup [0] on their experience with FBSD on the same laptop.
IIRC the reason they don't (can't?) provide a search API directly is because they're pulling from other search sources, e.g. Bing, and can't provide an API without licence violations.
Agreed that a DDG API would be pretty great, though.
If you don't like all the fluff on the results page, DDG provides two alternative interfaces [0] [1] with much simpler layouts.
Semi-related, here's a comparison of nitro and runit written by the author of nitro: https://leahneukirchen.org/blog/archive/2025/08/comparing-ni...
openSUSE Tumbleweed sounds like it would fit the bill. It's both rolling and has the benefit of having btrfs/snapper support baked in by default, so it's super easy to roll back anything if it breaks.
GrapheneOS is focused on being as secure as possible. When you put root access into the equation, all the security protections are irrelevant if apps are able to bypass them at will.
It's really not that hard to do, just antithetical to the purpose of the OS.
The name for that is letterboxing. The Tor Browser (and the Mullvad browser, based on the Tor one, and Firefox as of v. 67 with an about:config flag) all support it.
There are also add-ons that perform the same basic function with some added customisability [0].
[0] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/canvasblocker...
GrapheneOS only supports Pixels due to their having superior security features [0]. Calyx supports Pixels as well as some newer Motos and the Fairphone 4 and 5 [1]. Lineage supports tons of devices [2].
LineageOS is the only one of the three that supports older hardware, but I'd recommend getting a previous-gen Pixel for the seven-year (at least) support cycle.
[0] https://grapheneos.org/faq#supported-devices