HN user

snickmy

696 karma
Posts69
Comments188
View on HN
nicolabortignon.com 1mo ago

Why the Next Datacenter Should Be Sized for a Village, Not a City

snickmy
4pts1
www.xfra.ai 2mo ago

Xfra AI

snickmy
4pts1
techcrunch.com 1y ago

Uptime Industries wants to boost localized AI

snickmy
1pts0
www.lemony.ai 2y ago

Boxed LLMs for Business Teams

snickmy
1pts0
filmfinder.ai 2y ago

Film finder – Natural language interface for movie search

snickmy
1pts0
store.seedlabs.it 2y ago

Smart Knob Dev Kit – pre-order now

snickmy
1pts0
www.nicolabortignon.com 2y ago

From Ancient Rome to Smart Cities: Exploring 2000 Years of Urban Development

snickmy
1pts0
www.nicolabortignon.com 3y ago

Fully personalised podcast with LLM, tts and other ML techniques

snickmy
3pts1
www.nicolabortignon.com 3y ago

POC: Building a fully personalised podcast with LLM, TTS and other ML techniques

snickmy
2pts0
colab.research.google.com 3y ago

What Happened to SVB – A Notebook

snickmy
1pts0
www.theverge.com 3y ago

Google Home Hardware and Android are now Matter compatible

snickmy
1pts0
about.fb.com 4y ago

Tech companies hash sharing against NCII sharing

snickmy
1pts0
www.vanmoof.com 4y ago

Vanmoof V

snickmy
4pts1
nickclegg.medium.com 5y ago

You and the Algorithm

snickmy
1pts0
www.nicolabortignon.com 5y ago

The operative system for a decarbonised, decentralised, digitised energy system

snickmy
42pts26
intelino.com 5y ago

Intelino the Smart Train

snickmy
33pts11
www.nicolabortignon.com 5y ago

We Need More Platforms

snickmy
1pts0
www.nicolabortignon.com 5y ago

We need more Platforms in our lives

snickmy
1pts0
www.bloomberg.com 5y ago

Power Grids Aren’t Evolving Fast Enough for Global Warming

snickmy
4pts0
techcrunch.com 5y ago

Instagram Reels

snickmy
1pts0
delian.substack.com 5y ago

It's Time to Build Homes

snickmy
2pts0
twitter.com 6y ago

Elon Musk: will make ventilators if there is a shortage

snickmy
2pts0
www.nicolabortignon.com 8y ago

ML: things to know before getting started

snickmy
3pts0
www.nicolabortignon.com 8y ago

ML PROJECTS: things to know before getting started.

snickmy
3pts1
github.com 8y ago

A functional reactive framework for managing state evolution and side-effects

snickmy
1pts0
www.nicolabortignon.com 8y ago

My Favorite Papers of 2017

snickmy
152pts16
www.wifipineapple.com 9y ago

Wifi Pineapple

snickmy
1pts0
public.tableau.com 9y ago

The Emoji of Spotify

snickmy
2pts0
cloud.google.com 9y ago

DataPrep, by Google

snickmy
2pts0
multithreaded.stitchfix.com 9y ago

Real Data Science Algorithmic Applications

snickmy
5pts0

Agree. I'm unclear what's the highlight of this post. Is the multimodality of the model (that can replace computer vision), is it the reasoning part, is it the overall wrapper that makes it very easy to develop on top?

That is correct. When that will be available is the hard thing to guess.

There are currently enough production of electricity that is motor based (think about gas turbine, water turbines, etc), so there is a nice benefit of having AC at source and distribution.

The infrastructure needs to change. With an average lifetime of a substation in the 50-75years, it's hard to expect we'll overhaul completely the distribution system over night.

It's also hard for me to understand the power loss between the two scenarios (AC production, ac distribution, ac/dc conversion , dc consumption) and DC production, dc stepup to HVDC, dc distribution, DC stepdown and DC consumption). Even 1% at national scale means millions, so the entire business case might be anchored there. I'm sure there are smarter people than me here that can cast some light on this

I'm with you, and actually bullish on this to be a viable way forward.

48V DC has been eyed already for a potential standard to emerge. Doesn't need massive cables to deliver decent power (4A ~200W). There is enough hardware around coming from use cases like EV and Boats that could make it work. Many battery solutions already 'talk' 48v without lossy stepdown of voltage, etc.

Big plus is that the regulation is A LOT less strict for <48v DC compared to AC 110/220/240.

AC makes power distribution easier (because you can have modulated phases). So it's correct to say it's easier to move it over a long distance. Additionally, and i'm really simplifying, at parity of nominal voltage, you can move a lot more power, at a lower dissipation cost. This has resulted in few high power electronics to be AC native (ie.: no AC - DC - AC conversion). Think about motors in the various appliances, etc. It doesn't need to be like that, investment in DC car motors have pushed the industry to optimizes design, and get similar power output of the motor at lower energy consumption.

That said, if you are a manufacturer of an appliance and you have an addressable user base of billions with AC, and a 'potential new user base' with DC... you might just want to swallow the cost and add a DC / AC converter for the sake to not have to produce two variants of the most complex / costly item (the motor in this case).

An axiom of inevitabilism, especially among the highest echelons, is that you end up making it a reality. It’s the kind of belief that shapes reality itself. In simple terms: the fact that the Googles, Anthropics, and OpenAIs of the world have a strong interest in making LLMs the way AI pans out will most likely ensure that LLMs become the dominant paradigm — until someone else, with equal leverage, comes along to disrupt them.

Just wanted to callout how well written is this blog post (not necessarily from a substance standpoint, which in my opinion is very good as well), but from a fluidity and narrative standpoint.

It's quite rare in this day and age. Thank you, OP

I really feel for the creators here. I was thinking exactly like that before trying to build an electronic device myself.

Later on I talked to people working in the hardware industry for small production scale, and pretty much told me that a fair pricing is usually 5x to 7x the total BOM (bill of materials).

After going through that experience myself, I couldn't agree more. This device in particular has some extra well thought design and style which might be worth a premium (on top of that 5x/7x multiplier).

Shameless plug: I see few people in the comment that have been working there, or have had some first hand experience of that environment. I'd love the chance to interview them. This has been one of my main area of interest for a very long period. Anyone up for it ?

This was inevitable and we'll see it playing out all over Europe.

You have a desire to be relevant in an important technological shift.

On one side, you have big tech companies laser-focused on attracting the best talent and putting them in a high-pressure cooker to deliver real business outcomes, under a leadership group that has consistently proven effective for the last XX years.

On the other side, you have universities, led by the remnants of that talent pool—those who were left behind in the acquisition race—full of principles and philosophical opinions but with little to no grounded experience in actual execution. Instead, you find a bunch of PhD students who either didn’t make the cut to be hired by the aforementioned tech companies or lack the DNA to thrive in them, actively avoiding that environment. Sprinkle on top several layers of governmental bureaucracy and diluted leadership, just to ensure everyone gets a fair slice of the extra funding.

I'm surprised anyone is surprised.

Went to the demo, played some basic counterpoint, probably some poorly recalled lines from Bach, and I always get surprised how well the music of that time fits the instrument capabilities.

what problem are you solving?

Discovery ? Ease of arrangement and management?

If discovery, you are fighting against worth of mouth of a very clicky group of people, that have plenty of other ways to exchange infomration that leads to discovery.

If it is ease of arrangement, you are fighting against SMS/text-messages.

TLDR: there is no business opportunity here, but it's a cool CRUD app to build and i'm sure you'll learn something in the process.

If you disagree with the above, do some user research with your target demographic. If you agree with the above, do some user research with your target demographic :)

I have a theory that is grounded on no-scientific evidence whats-so-ever. This applies only to the 2-5y population.

1) kids in nursery get sick a whole lot, and is not always just 'building up their immunitary system', it really is a one-two punch of constant illness that drugs for months on, with little to no recovery mechanisms. This is truer in bigger city with a higher turnover of the class cohort

2) a lot of the socialization aspect of nursery is overrated. Parallel play is a thing, and the need for socialization doesn't require a whole 8 hours. There are plenty of other opportunities to socialize. Especially in higher density areas, where institutions are more involved in creating moments for kids to socialize.

3) the cost of central group based nursery has skyrocket. (just empiric evidence), at the same time there is an increasing supply of 20-something-y-old that don't want a nursery job, but are happy to do a more flexible working hour in a less 'stressful' enviroment (aka less children, more home based).

The combination of the 3 things has made homeschooling a lot more interesting for parents.