HN user

shr30

10 karma

Xoogler Product guy - Social impact tech (prior exp in Ads measurement, support teams & improving scale & impact of those teams) - Care about outcome & thoughtful tech - Building Starlight (www.get-starlight.com) - Motivated by modeling solutions on real world humans who are successful and impactful.

Posts2
Comments3
View on HN

I'd significantly disagree on this - speed reading as the norm to ascertain value and then, re-reading especially on the internet worlds and with randomness of shared links.

It's sensible to read in depth for when we know / establish value, but in general, better to skim and identify / perceive value or added knowledge, then take the plunge.

There are un-fun things to work on in life and if you are going to hire a "non-superstar" and have them work on a non-critical part of your company, it's not that bad.

If someone has a outside passion - say sailing and wants to just get a job to help them pursue it, more power to them if you can adequately utilize the talents in 30-40 hours versus a powerhouse 90 hr die-hard talent.

Personally, I find fulfillment in my 40-80 hr "day" job and then go pursue other fun activities; a lot of my (especially engineering - non-cs/ee) friends want a 30-40 hr job and some play power, others trade stocks, others play sports rabidly every evening - you must respect the personal motivations and find a way to align it with your organization / startup, if you cannot, then yeah, it's done.