WHY SPEED READING IS FOR FOOLS

http://scottberkun.com/2014/why-speed-reading-is-for-fools/

by jjude • 12 years ago

3 5 12 years ago

shr30• 12 years ago

I'd significantly disagree on this - speed reading as the norm to ascertain value and then, re-reading especially on the internet worlds and with randomness of shared links.

It's sensible to read in depth for when we know / establish value, but in general, better to skim and identify / perceive value or added knowledge, then take the plunge.

EdiX• 12 years ago

If reading is your main form of entertainment 40 books/year is not much.

jeremysmyth• 12 years ago

"I agree there are cases where skimming and speed reading make sense...The great works have many layers and are worthy of repeat trips." - The author, in comments.

I can't help but wonder was his article title clickbait, his article premise born out of ignorance, and his comments indicate his journey to learning that, in fact, speed reading is widely used as a learning technique in conjunction with what he terms "deep reading".

chazu• 12 years ago

My main gripe with this article is the clickbait title, in all caps. I personally disagree with the author's categorical dismissal of speed reading in the article, but that's neither here nor there. I just can't take articles seriously when they appear to be quickly dashed out, opportunistic responses to garner a few views without actually providing thoughtful commentary.

amykhar• 12 years ago

I must confess, I used the Spreed chrome extension to read this.

WHY SPEED READING IS FOR FOOLS

Related Stories