HN user

rfreytag

12,722 karma

gotyoufromhackernews@freytag.org

Posts1,181
Comments341
View on HN
en.wikipedia.org 2y ago

Clarke's Three Laws

rfreytag
1pts0
www.nytimes.com 2y ago

The Penetrating Gaze of One of America's Most Brilliant Art Critics (2019)

rfreytag
1pts1
www.rbth.com 2y ago

Why Stalin created a cult of Alexander Pushkin (2017)

rfreytag
2pts0
nanowrimo.org 2y ago

NaNoWriMo: National Novel Writing Month

rfreytag
2pts1
nanowrimo.org 2y ago

NaNoWriMo: National Novel Writing Month

rfreytag
100pts71
xbio.jmir.org 2y ago

The Loch Ness Monster: If It's Real, Could It Be an Eel?

rfreytag
8pts9
www.archives.gov 2y ago

In Event of Moon Disaster (1969) [pdf]

rfreytag
1pts0
podcasts.apple.com 2y ago

Ukraine's Drone Factories [audio]

rfreytag
2pts0
www.thecoachingtoolscompany.com 2y ago

The Urgent-Important Matrix (2013)

rfreytag
21pts10
www.youtube.com 2y ago

AI X Mathematics [video]

rfreytag
2pts0
www.cs.ox.ac.uk 2y ago

The Symbol Grounding Problem (1990) [pdf]

rfreytag
40pts5
www.nytimes.com 2y ago

Iron Dust Could Reverse the Course of Climate Change

rfreytag
7pts9
www.sympy.org 2y ago

SymPy: Python Library for Symbolic Mathematics

rfreytag
2pts0
www.npr.org 2y ago

NYT reporter details the struggle within the military to modernize its forces

rfreytag
2pts0
www.konichivalue.com 2y ago

Will China Be the Next Japan?

rfreytag
9pts0
www.technologyreview.com 3y ago

A brain implant changed her life. Then it was removed against her will

rfreytag
2pts1
sciencing.com 3y ago

How to build an ecosystem (2017)

rfreytag
15pts2
www.smithsonianmag.com 3y ago

Mathematicians Have Found a Shape with a Pattern That Never Repeats

rfreytag
86pts43
www.charlesdickensillustration.org 3y ago

The Charles Dickens Illustrated Gallery

rfreytag
38pts2
www.thedrive.com 3y ago

How to Land a Fighter on an Aircraft Carrier on a Stormy Night (2020)

rfreytag
2pts0
www.npr.org 3y ago

What if AI could rebuild the middle class?

rfreytag
2pts1
en.wikipedia.org 3y ago

Pax Calendar

rfreytag
48pts24
www.theguardian.com 3y ago

From Kepler to Newton: Explainable AI for Science Discovery

rfreytag
1pts1
en.wikipedia.org 3y ago

2002 Überlingen mid-air collision

rfreytag
1pts0
nymag.com 3y ago

The Art Criticism of Jerry Saltz

rfreytag
35pts9
www.businessinsider.com 3y ago

Climatic and environmental aspects of Mongol withdrawal from Hungary (2016)

rfreytag
64pts92
www.sciencenews.org 3y ago

Julia Robinson helped define the limits of mathematical knowledge (2019)

rfreytag
64pts18
thatsmaths.com 3y ago

Torricelli’s Trumpet and the Painter’s Paradox (2017)

rfreytag
1pts0
tedspence.com 3y ago

Teaching to Empty Rectangles

rfreytag
1pts0
www.science.org 3y ago

AI Learns the Art of Diplomacy

rfreytag
1pts0

Interesting plot. It would need to have multiple parallel plots where each nation with a nuclear arsenal thinks they are the only one that has lost their nuclear capability. Hijinks ensue as each tries to bluff the national actors.

Nuclear weapons are not very useful when you have good intelligence and a distributed ability to delivey vast amounts of precious-guided weapons.

I assume they are using renewable energy to reduce naturally-occurring iron oxide.

When the iron is burnt are they going to do with pure oxygen? Otherwise they'll get pollutants like nitrogen dioxide, possibly ozone. And the 0.5% not burnt will also become a pollutant unless carefully removed in some smokestack scrubber.

Or is this 'burning' to occur some kind of iron fuel cell? How would they liquidize the iron which is quite heavy?

Lastly, iron is heavy. Moving reduced iron could be expensive and dangerous.

Still, if sufficiently close to the renewable source this could provide much needed load leveling for intermittent sources.

Article alleges it is not external threats but corrupt political interests that drive ever higher US defense spending. But correlation is not causation and this link is unsupported, especially when no analysis of the un/reality of the external threat is offered. There is some low-hanging fruit here around Iraq so not bringing that in leads me to question the quality of this article. It is harder to make that case with the Cold War or the PRC vs its South China Sea neighbors so perhaps that is why this aspect of their argument was not pursued.

I think F# is going to do well because it is driven by the community making it an open field despite being .NET. F# developers seem to have a higher than usual lower-bound.

Elmish.WPF, FParsec, so much there and still things to do...like better development tooling with VS Studio Pro.

If it were a sure thing it wouldn't be a challenge or quite as interesting.

Memento mori 4 years ago

The motivation is this interesting story... ' After a major military victory, the triumphant military generals were paraded through the streets to the roars of the masses. The ceremonial procession could span the course of a day with the military leader riding in a chariot drawn by four horses. There was not a more coveted honor. The general was idolized, viewed as divine by his troops and the public alike. But riding in the same chariot, standing just behind the worshipped general, was a slave. The slave’s sole responsibility for the entirety of the procession was to whisper in the general’s ear continuously, “Respice post te. Hominem te esse memento. Memento mori!”

“Look behind. Remember thou art mortal. Remember you must die!”

The slave served to remind the victor at the peak of glory, this god-like adoration would soon end, while the truth of his mortality remained. '

That story is given here in the section titled "Romans": https://dailystoic.com/history-of-memento-mori/

How I make my rugs 4 years ago

The comments veered away from Tabitha Arnold's work which is quite good. Her post (OP) is full of examples from an artist with a distinct point of view and the ability to convey it clearly.

Alien Truth 4 years ago

PBS SpaceTime notes the fine structure constant (~1/137) is dimensionless and ubiquitous in physics. As a result, transmitting that ratio would be a good and clear indication we are intelligent enough to have at least that much physics: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCSSgxV9qNw&t=564s

This might be better than mathematical constructs which conceivably do not require technology, "just" thought to discover.

Government accounting books debt immediately but cannot book the offsetting gains accruing from social services that historically result in lower future costs of policing and incarceration and higher revenues from citizens living productive lives longer.

CATO repeatedly gets this wrong.

Investment delivered to increase the productivity of those currently unlikely to be productive will result in significant GDP growth.

The problem lies in government subsidies to already productive businesses and demographic groups that produce relatively small marginal growth for their investment. The Trump tax cut is the latest example of such a misallocation of capital.

Acknowledging the realities of increases in lifespan and extended quality of life along with a strong public campaign against age discrimination would greatly increase the productivity of a significant sector of the population while incurring relatively little additional training costs. This would then justify raising the Social Security retirement age with consequential decreases in the cost of that entitlement program.

These changes to budget priorities become vital if we are to avoid significant additional borrowing in the new high-interest environment.

Of course, as time marches on boomers will leave the Medicare and Social Security system resulting in a significant reduction in costs. The possibility of a surplus in a little over a decade is conceivable.

The author fails to consider the direction or rate of change the USA standing versus other nations. For most factors considered by the author the outlook is not good for the USA. Churchill did say the USA can be counted on to do the right thing after trying every other option; but nothing changes for the better if one's head is stuck in the sand.

Search for 24:07, about 3/4 down where Strogatz poses the question: "do you imagine ... there will be a time when the descendants of Lean will be able to teach themselves math, rather than having human teachers creating libraries?"