razorbeamz

This is the beginning of the end for the bubble.

All of those signs legitimately point towards the destinations on them. I don't understand what your argument is.

No, it's incorrect that signs "point to each other."

There are multiple ways to get to various lines' platforms. This is not signs pointing to each other, this is signs in different places pointing to the same destination.

I live in Tokyo and while I do not go through Shinjuku often as I mostly live and work on the east side, I have no issue using the signs to find the platforms and exits I am looking for.

If you pay attention to what the signs have written on them, they will take you where you are trying to go.

No they aren't. People who say this have never spent a significant amount of time there.

LLMs don't actually reason, they just create the illusion of reasoning by repeating things over and over.

This game is included in Nintendo's Clubhouse Games: 51 Worldwide Classics on Switch (known in Europe as 51 Worldwide Games)

The site you cited is AI slop.

What is the big push for humanoid robots? We make non-humanoid robots because they're better at doing things than humanoid robots are.

I think that's just coincidental. I've mentioned it to Japanese people before and they can't see the connection at all.

Yeah, it's always obvious when this kind of thing is written by someone who has only ever been to Japan as a tourist, if they have at all.

Just a deep fundamental misunderstanding of how things work.

This is absolutely a scam. Seems incredibly fishy.

The flavor text is very Claude.

True but irrelevant.

This 8-track duplication puzzle is a problem of math.

But LLM can write code that can do math and count.

They cannot, however, execute that code. They can feed that code into an external program they've been given access to, but they can't execute it themselves.

No, they fundamentally cannot do math. They are next token predictors, not calculators.

LLMs are not the ideal tool for this job, because LLMs cannot do math or count.

Pac-Man Vs. is also available on the Switch.

That's because the AI that generated this doesn't know what splitting wood is like.

This will be an excellent demonstration of what AI is incapable of.

That's just America.

Looks like Hiroshi Nagamochi did all the boring work.

If this is anything like that stupid AI pin it's going to fail.

Very surprised Navajo is so strong.

My wife also got upset with me over this.

I think the writer of this misunderstands "tourist trap."

Tourist traps, at least as I see it, are places or activities that are more expensive than they should be.

For example, a tourist trap in Tokyo is going to the top of SkyTree. It's not something locals can really reasonably afford doing more than once, because it's really expensive. The price is such that basically only tourists would do it.

LLM written article.

Because too many new companies are popping up with the business model of "We're going to use AI" and they don't actually have any explanation for how or why they're going to use AI.

This is just like the Dot Com Bubble, where a lot of companies popped up saying they were going to "use the internet" without actually having a plan.

I think it's just a simulation of what it could look like if it were flipdiscs.

I have a hard time believing kids actually are wanting this thing.

Parents wanting it for their kids, sure. But every kid would rather have an iPhone.

There is something darkly comical about using an LLM to write up your “a coding agent deleted our production database” Twitter post.

Which calls into question if this is even real.