HN user
This is infuriating. You are talking about people who have stolen and monetized the entirety of mankind's knowledge in plain view of everyone, and they still haven't faced a shred of consequences. Of course they don't go about doing things ethically or responsibly
or Chateau Frontenac in Quebec? What's the criteria for being a castle?
Psychology of AI Software Teams
taking preorders now
this is why I force plain text on emails
Sure, no problem with that, use Interpol's screening tech as a tool - that's what it is. Just a repository of information that you access and then decide what to do with the result just like any other API hit
The author's site is https://www.drcathicks.com/ and this is the publisher.
What do you think is stopping the US? It could be privacy but I don't think that would hold up in the public court as the US is way worse than EU when it comes to privacy regulations... what else? Control?
And we're not talking about "border security" in its entirety, just the screening/identifying part.
Isn't that why there's an org like Interpol with 192 countries "members" or "represented" I'm not sure which. Everyone owns it together kinda thing
Why isn't screening tech globalized on a planetary level? Shouldn't someone like INTERPOL take care of that?
Mullenweg will never allow WP to slip away from his control. "He wrote it" so you can't have it.
So... nothing that it wasn't already doing to itself? There's no one drop where "AI got into the market", SO had been declining steadily for years. I actually expected this post to be about how SO survived by selling its internal organs to AI.
Now do a graph for the money.
https://www.wired.com/story/google-deal-stackoverflow-ai-gia...
It correlates directly with AI adoption.
That's... not a font? That's a generated animated image/video?
"A computer font or digital font is a digital data file containing a set of graphically related glyphs"
so it's not a font, humans can't read it and AI can.
It's one thing to spy on your population/users, it's another to spy on your clients.
You can go all authoritarian fascist if that's what floats your boat, but at least don't backstab people who buy shit from you.
Can't you be repressive and professional?!
There was a time where the default assumption was functionality created tracking opportunities. Nowadays, it's more the opposite. Social media have always been on the forefront of monetizing data, but the same data in the hands of governments is used differently. My point is that the way you/we feel towards Facebook, the entire world is increasingly feeling about most, if not all, US tech.
I know people who won't use Israeli or Chinese-made tech for fears of sabotage. US tech is quickly making its brand in that market.
US Tech is fast becoming like Russia's and China's.
Compare with FrankenPHP?
Nobody calls it that.
I literally will not buy a car that does not support CarPlay.
I think you mean addictive.
I mean... if you look at the "Logging on today" section, they're using Chrome on Windows 10/11 and spend half the 17 steps dealing with those two things.
The first thing about the Internet is that you should know by now how to use it, at least as well as it knows how to use you. If not, you will be subjected to the Internet, not using it but being used. The web has evolved to a point where you need to remove a few layers before you find the actual web.
Don't use predatory social media. Don't use Chrome. Don't use Windows. Those three things will get you 90% of the way back. The rest is using the Fediverse, the small web, moving away from Google and subscription shit like Netflix and the rest of the business who trade with your time.
Learn to identify the things that are actively trying to profit off of you and don't use them, even if they're made to be extraordinarily convenient. The web you like is still there, it just takes some effort and know-how to get to.
Wouldn't that be.. acceptable, if not entirely the point? Raising awareness? Some rando getting arrested for a screensaver they didn't know contained a flag is pretty efficient propaganda and would likely turn at least the involved people and their inner circles? It might not be the point but I doubt they'd be disappointed
Man, the World Apology Tour is gonna be a generational event won't it
"Here's an explanation by AI.
<Explanation>
Now if someone could give us a trustworthy explanation."
This one's gone too.
Look at Zuck and Musk. Their platforms are still used by millions. It's only "us" that care about the pedigree of our tech founders, most people couldn't care less.
Their stance seems to be "people can do things on their own personal time":
Nobody's interested because everyone is one prompt away from exactly the same thing catered to their specific needs.
Depending on your jurisdiction, reviews are protected free speech. You're arguably reviewing your employment.
Glassdoor before they allowed takeovers of corporate pages by the business operators. But your best bet is probably unfortunately to scan social media. There's ghostjobs.io for job offer reviews but I'm not aware of anything else.