HN user
It is a feature in Rust, not a bug :-) (I know you didn't say it is a bug.)
The error-tagged union is PgResult<bool> - which means it contains bool as the result if things go well. (The other part in the union is of course the error.)
In the original function also, it is returning a boolean: "bool has_subclass".
So anyway you have to check for the boolean as part of the logic. That is what it is doing.
I had the 2012 print edition. One of the best books available - the best book that I knew - about GC at that time.
Anti-pattern: Regarding the 2023 e-book edition, I do not see a way to buy it from the site, or even a link to buy.
I am writing this for you as well as those who are likely to read this later as well.
From the quoted snippet from the original article, purportedly AI-generated:
Not a tutorial. Not an ORM. Actual SQL
From my comment:
Not stock options. Do not gamble, your life is passing you by.
Not titles, unless you have a clear plan to leverage your title into a better paying job.
Not "job safety" - it is never safe. You being in an in-demand area is your job safety.
Darn. I write exactly like this. You need to consider that people write in different ways, and the LLM is choosing from among the different styles.
I watched this last week.
The part about veering constantly to navigate the maze of internal politics is fascinating. The compromises he had to make, like not being able to put in on Github initially. The easy victories, like making TypeScript open source.
The long road to success. The obligatory advice for people writing new programming languages (Hint: Mostly, don't.). His opinion about creating a new language for AI (I agree with his insight, but still think it is possible).
Overall, well worth watching.
Just in case anyone does not know, that is a Base64URL-encoded string. Used by JWT.
Merry Christmas to everyone.
Being a non-Christian and it being Christmas time, I am sharing one verse from the New Testament that is, in my opinion, useful - or at the very least, insightful - to anyone, regardless of religion.
Luke 16:10: He who is faithful in a very little thing is faithful also in much; and he who is unrighteous in a very little thing is unrighteous also in much.
What confused me was this: "Now remove the two men, just keep the dog, and put them in an OpenAI livestream that looks like the attached image.".
The word "them" implied plural. I was looking for the dog and something else. Thanks.
It need not be a dichotomy. I also laughed at the title. At the same time, I found the original article useful.
Now remove the two men, just keep the dog, and put them in an OpenAI livestream that looks like the attached image.
Where is the image given along with the prompt? If I didn't miss it: Would have been nice to show the attached image.
which are known to produce predictable fMRI signal changes in distributed brain regions.
Wondering how they created that baseline. Was it with fMRI data (which has deviance from actual data, as pointed out)? Or was it through other means?
I use version managers for Python, Node, Ruby, and others. But for Java, none. I have all the recent versions of Java on my Linux and Windows devices. I download the zip and extract it to a common directory "Java". Setting the path within IDEs is easy, and is mostly unavoidable (regardless of a version manager). Running standalone programs is not that complicated too.
Observations and personal opinions, after glancing through the slides:
* The entertainment industry will be transformed drastically. Music and movies will be transformed by AI to such an extent that the next generation will find it hard to believe how the industry operated.
* The moonshot will be biological research and research in general. When a breakthrough happens, it will transform our health for the better in astonishing ways.
* In terms of direct adoption, the urban-rural divide is vast.
* Less democratic countries will have an advantage over the democratic countries in terms of fast execution, unless the latter manage to integrate private-public operations effectively.
* I've liked Mary Meeker's reports since the heydays of TechCrunch. This report has a lot of details that I did not know. Nevertheless, I didn't see a single point that stood out.
So, to summarize:
Used "dictionary learning"
Found abstract features
Found similar/close features using distance
Tried amplifying and suppressing features
Not trying to be snary, but sounds mundane in the ML/LLM world. Then again, significant advances have come from simple concepts. Would love to hear from someone who has been able to try this out.
Other than visualizing, creating custom nodes seems to be the most interesting available operation (at the time of writing this).
API Guide:
https://github.com/google-ai-edge/model-explorer/wiki/4.-API...
Custom Nodes - User Guide:
https://github.com/google-ai-edge/model-explorer/wiki/2.-Use...
It is very low indeed, and a large percentage of the cases are involving strains from other countries, but hopefully the number is not real zero[1], even after discounting the strains from other countries.
As far as I understand it, they used 25 human and 12 squirrel samples. Comparison was done among medieval red squirrel strains, medieval human strains, and modern red squirrel strains.
Finding: medieval red squirrel strains were closer to medieval human strains than to modern red squirrel strains.
Inference: In medieval England, leprosy spread between red squirrels and people.
Problem with the inference: If they used modern human strains too and then compared them all, it would have been a complete study.
Are modern red squirrel strains closer to modern human strains than to medieval red squirrel strains? What kind of differences are there? Is it that they evolved independently from medieval times to modern times and thus appear different? Lots of questions are unanswered.
About the female whale whose dorsal fin was punctured: "Ólafur appears to have developed a personal kinship with the whale"
A macabre kinship that involved spearing her calf. And eventually, killing the female whale herself while trying to kill her calf again.
Just want to point out that this is a free book. Direct link: [1]. Also, the real content is only a little over 200 pages. The rest is notes, references, and other resources.
With the recent advancements in AI and space technology, space militarization may become the top existential threat we as human beings face, probably topping both climate change and the depletion of essential resources.
[1] https://direct.mit.edu/books/book-pdf/2369358/book_978026237...
I cannot edit this anymore. Yes, meant that the control Aptiv had over Motional will now be with Hyundai, practically.
The point I was trying to make was that this was titled in Aptiv's Q1 presentation [1] as "APTIV EQUITY INTEREST TO BE REDUCED FROM 50% TO 15%". That is, they will offload most of the control to Hyundai. Immediately, Aptiv shares rose. So for some reason, this is seen as a good thing by Aptiv shareholders.
My point was and is: Considering the above aspect, it will be interesting to see how Hyundai will make use of it.
[1] https://s22.q4cdn.com/336558720/files/doc_presentations/2024...
As part of the deal, Hyundai is also getting control of Aptiv, with 85% of the shares. It will be interesting to see what Hyundai will do with it.
The story starts with Genghis Khan's plunder of Merv and the mass murder that was ordered by him. It mentions the artisans who were kept alive. Then it swerves to the plunder of Merv by the Oghuz, continues in the next paragraph, and then returns to Genghis Khan by announcing his death.
Again, it returns to the artisans,but mid-paragraph (as is typical in that article), switches to battles again, and returns yet again to silk and artisans. At last, it connects the battles and the silk together.
This is probably why it appears very hard to read. Especially, the mid-paragraph context switches continuing to the subsequent paragraph.
Nevertheless , a fascinating read.
Anything which has clear paths to decision making, does not need AI.
Anything which requires only massive data processing, does not need AI.
Regarding the adoption: The crux is mentioned in the article well. You are building on top of faulty systems. However great the AI model is, you are given faulty data to process. It will not end well.
The way releases are done and security is handled, one can argue that it makes sense to stay one major version behind - as long as it is a version to which security patches are applied regularly.
Excellent course. The only caveat I want to add is, the estimated hours to complete (23 hours) can vary extremely, depending on your 'pre-mastery' of the subject (or lack of it). Prepare and pace yourself considering that.
You have to look at old languages for this.
In the order of preference:
Qt (C++), Swing (Java), and Visual Component Library (Delphi) are three tried and tested options for you.
Go to Kuwait, partner with one of the ruling family members, and set up a BTC mining company to mine bitcoins - since it still seems to be legal, as of now. Kuwait is one of the cheapest places to do this. Once you have made enough, sell the company to the ruling family and leave forever.
For issues unknown to the user until they are locked out.
The amazing part is (as far as I remember) that both were implemented[1] as single files[2][3].
[1] http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/rewritingreddit
[2] https://web.archive.org/web/20060213215829/http://webpy.org/...
[3] https://web.archive.org/web/20060106081029/http://webpy.org/...