you’re mocking his weak references but you’re not offering one yourself
HN user
pablasso
Hey there
https://pablasso.com
Would love an invite if you still have
7jsqi5gf at duck.com
Even if it is a bad practice not to have your own backups, no one is at fault here but Gandi
Where can I read more about this Carmack?
Of course they care. Every tourist killed brings more attention to them than needed, if the person was high profile enough it can bring enough international pressure for the government to take them down.
Event sourcing was one of LinkedIn use cases when they created it, Kafka is fine for all logging needs.
Can you share said issue?
Who is right here?
Is there any alternative way to access these papers? I'm interested but $43 seems too steep.
Can you share a link to your steam?
I get your point, but if there's no space for critique we wouldn't have any improvements ever.
That someone else has it worse doesn't make it invalid.
If you don't mind the feedback, I get the point of your post but you came out pretty aggressive very often. "This is horrible", "wtf is this", "this is awful" are not useful.
Here's a link to the repository: https://github.com/pablasso/chelodina
If you like this kind of content I heavily recommend Halt and Catch Fire. It's fiction on the personal computing business of the 80s, online gaming/communities and the race for search engines and browsers in the 90s . It makes a lot of nudges to current industry leaders.
That library reminded me of Newgrounds. Back in the day, it was a treat to go through all the games to discover gems but I don't have the patience anymore.
You will be losing the audience though
I tend to do that but is super draining. I could spend hours and then look back at it and get depressed because I didn't do as much as I expected.
And at the end I'm still as tired as if I worked 100% focused on something, I try to avoid this as much as possible.
So now that Amazon is a bigger threat in the ads space, Facebook enters e-commerce. It's going to be an uphill battle if they want to catch up anytime soon.
My preference is for Unix and its ecosystem. I was a long time user of Gentoo, then Debian, then Ubuntu. On Gentoo I was more than happy to install everything from source and to optimize to my hardware where possible. I moved eventually to more user-friendly solutions (hence Ubuntu) as my work obligations grew because I couldn't afford anymore to waste half a day just fixing up an update in xorg/pulseaudio/whatever.
MacOS is pretty much the ultimate Unix environment where everything just works. You may not get as good package managers like Portage, but MacOS usually has a good enough solution like MacPorts back then or Homebrew now.
OS Updates while sometimes may have hiccups here and there (like the migration from GCC to Clang) it's usually painless with me only having to tweak a couple of settings here and there in my day to day tooling, like tmux. In Linux I expected it to break something major and actually scheduled at least a day to fix it.
In summary, I like Unix and I just want to focus on work.
Does anyone have an opinion on how Laravel compares to Django or Rails?
I hate cases, is like people covering their car seats.
I like using them the way they were designed.
This is about how Git works internally, not a usage tutorial.
How is `git init` or `hg init` harder than maintaining different versions of your code in separate folders?
You still didn't explained why it wasn't a good practice. This just sounds impractical.
I get where you're going. But I can't just recall any travel or situation where iPhone cables were not available.
At least they succeeded in being popular enough to be practical.
Oh, I can play this game too: Why don't we make software without bugs? if you do software in an intelligent way there's no need to create bugs.
Of course everyone strives for better processes —at the end of the day, that means more revenue— is just that those problems seem easier to solve from the outside.
That's why you encrypt sensitive stuff before saving it on dropbox.
I'm from a developing country too and that is such an exaggeration. Maybe your career has been focused on mobile, but no way there's overall more native development than web.
It used to work with Jabber, it doesn't work now.
How is standardization a bad thing in programming? in prose I can see the argument, but in programming you should always aim for standardization for code maintenance.