HN user

oznog

11 karma
Posts3
Comments19
View on HN

SQL replacements is like not understanding the magnitude of the success of something so old.

SQL is fine.

SQL has been the state of the art for db queries for 40 years.

And it will continue to be when we all retire.

If you are so weak you cannot pretend to influence and change the behavior of others.

So, this debate is absolutely ridiculous and stupid.

And this shit represents the pinnacle of a generation so fragile and incompetent that it will lead to "worse times".

The quality of posts and comments here used to be a lot higher but it's slowly turning into a [..]

You can go on with your GraphQL, Kubernetes, gigantic frameworks, and pages with 3MB of JS if you want.

And let's see what stands the test of time.

It's another postmodern web development fuck-up.

I saw it coming for miles and evaded it.

Your complexity is my competitive advantage. Please continue to be followers of any new shit.

Clouds have multiple conflicts of interest in favor of:

1. Dethroning sysadmins introducing devops in the middle ("devs" capable of deploying in the cloud but unable to control the OS).

2. Increase CPU and other resource consumption (promoting heavy frameworks, unable to pass the Doherty threshold in 2022).

For clouds, increasing complexity and costs almost always expands the business.

You have screwed yourselves.

I'm still doing my projects with LAMP technology. With my own framework with a 150 lines kernel, routed with FS, looking for the maximum simplicity as principle number one.

Postmodern web development lost the Doherty threshold.

I measure my page load in tenths of a millisecond. Average page generated in 1-9 milliseconds, including the tipical 2-6 simple SQL local queries.

Your complexity is my competitive advantage.