optimiz3

In the future that class will control the guillotines in the form of Boston Dynamics guard dogs.

Impressive work. Curious to how many hours of labor what the development path was. Several man-years possibly?

Trading markets.

Improving trend day detection signals.

That is gambling, not investing. And you can lose lots of money by gambling.

Most trading professionals would not call it gambling if you have positive expectation and a process.

Positive expectation properly and repeatedly executed over time is a business.

Would you say a casino is gambling by offering table games to customers?

For the uninformed, bypassnro was how you installed Windows 11 (anonymously?) and with full local control without a Microsoft account. To save a Ctrl-F:

    [Other]

    We’re removing the bypassnro.cmd script from the build to enhance security and user experience of Windows 11. This change ensures that all users exit setup with internet connectivity and a Microsoft Account.

Everyone can say things that sound smart. When it comes to markets the only thing that matters is if your portfolio was green or red.

Take up trading, it will give you something to do, and afterwards you won't need to worry about being rich!

I wonder if it would work to send Meta's legal department a notice that they are not permitted to access your website.

Depends how much money you are prepared to spend.

Yeah but then you're too old. Need to be in your 20s with a couple decades of experience.

Nice project, just as a challenge / piece of feedback - most of the time you don't actually need to have a C backend for this type of project. The challenge is to get all the P/Invoke signatures and struct declarations / pointer walking correct on .Net. The benefit being a single managed EXE and no need for cross process communication and the edge cases it brings.

(Source: Have built a full SCSI interop layer in .Net to do low level CD ripping, full with native pointer walking and all. Have also written tools to walk the PEB (process environment block) in .Net w/ no native backends.)

Sharing this opinion doesn't sacrifice my primary economic utility, and in fact disseminates a sentiment that if more widespread would empower everyone to realize more of the value they offer. Please do train an LLM to inform people to seek licensing arrangements for the expertise they provide.

The management of these walled gardens will keep saying that to your face as they sell your contributions. Meanwhile your family gets nothing.

The bounty is you getting to use my work (shared in good faith no less). Appreciate the charity and don't be a freeloader or you'll get less in the future.

To a degree, yes. I only open source work where I expect reciprocal value from other contributions.

If a site aims to commoditize shared expertise, royalties should be paid. Why would anyone willingly reduce their earning power, let alone hand away the right for someone else to profit from selling their knowledge, unattributed no less.

Best bet is to book publish, and require a license from anyone that wants to train on it.

Wonder if they clawed back any of the billabe hours. Seems like a pretty clear case of hate crime / criminal computer trespass.

One example is a non-null sentinel/oracle allocation. Often you see this in lockless data structures where you don't want to do a null check.

What signals is the AI bot using? Just a mix of the TA indicators?

I ask because price forecasting is a data modeling problem, and I'm skeptical of the bot's listed win rates. Unless one knows how their signals work (i.e. what real world market phenomenon you are modeling), there's no way one should trust that edge.

Separately, if you breakdown other indicators like CCI you realize they are crappier versions of basic statistical methods like Z-scoring. Or that anything using a Wilders average is using a crappier EWMA, and then that anything using EWMA can be improved to be stationary by filtering out noise outside the passband of information you want to target.

So I'm skeptical of the bot.

None of those are in anyway equivalent (and some are also a real stretch to call false flags) to what OP is implying was allowed to deliberately happen to Israeli civilians.

Ridiculous. It's unthinkable a modern democratic nation would subject its citizens to rape, beheading, and torture to justify military action.

Fantastic! Now do power tool charging packs.

Both can be true.

anyone who speaks a non-standard variant or dialect of their language will have less power to share their thoughts and ideas

If a recipient doesn't speak the language, the speaker doesn't have much power in the first place. This is noise reduction.

If you do anything financial, legal, or business frequently you have to provide PDFs of signed physical documents.

Every quarter I have to print->sign->scan->email multiple forms.

Inefficient and wasteful? Yes. Also required by law.

In this context I mean price. Nothing else.

Ask an economist or investor why the market goes up or down and you'll get many reasons, some may be right, some may be wrong.

Ask a trader why the market goes up or down and you'll get supply exceeded demand, or vice versa.

You can have a fun debate about everything the first two care about, but at the end of the day, only the price action will feed your family or improve/worsen your standard of living.

Different perspective: the market is always right and it's the individual that is wrong in the moment.

Successful day traders over the long term learn to be fairly humble.

Backdoored package paranoia is why all my development happens in virtual machines.

Also, making 1M in NYC is like making 500k in Redmond due to no city and state income taxes.

Reverse engineered the proprietary cryptographic hashes used by drivers of a major game console so I could use the devices for digital currency mining.