one33seven

The back and forth of the different authors is quite interesting

If it is based on all our data, we should all own it and democratically chose what is done with it or profits it generates

Imagine your mum died. It's not nice to say "hey tjwebbnorfolk your mum is dead" is it? It's true, but vile.

In germany it's an organization of the biggest copyright holders that make ISPs block sites, without any court order.

But why use a ready made software when you can have AI build one for you

Many reasons. Especially for something that's supposed to protect my identity. Cool project nonetheless.

Hitler was elected too (not saying he is Hitler)

It is not about CSAM, it's about scanning our data. If it were about kids safety there would be lots of people in jail

This is what happened with YouTube for instance

Yes like money and agriculture. We produce enough food for everyone and then throw it away because some dont have money for it. Very good example!

Fair analysis. But we should lose sight of the goal to end this horror.

Kind of like "end slavery" vs "make living conditions for slaves better".

They bombed civilians and fisher boats and so on, if that's not war what is it?

Don't "detain" (kidnap) and "remove" (mass deport) them?

I don't like the whole system of masked guys without badgets picking up kids from the street and putting them in camps to be deported. Do you get my sentiment?

Especially since the country doing it has no, literally no moral reason to claim the land. USA is a settler colonialist project.

They even tried deporting native americans! This whole shit has to stop.

They need to be abolished, not reformed.

I would say there is a lot wrong with a system based around getting rich with AI... it's already dangerous and if we would work together we could test it securely before deploying it literally everywhere

You really put a lot of trust in countries that are rules by oligarchs and where a far-right is rising to power...

Depends on the war. Venezuela was quickly won.

You are forgetting that this is largely edited by AI as a fun project. Finding a bug in that firefox probably is a lot easier than usual.

Socialists, like those running Jacobin, argue for democratic rule over AI. They are not claiming all problems go away when nationalizing AI, they are saying if we want to control what was build on our data, we should actually democratically control it instead of having billionaires do what they want with it.

"AI Is a Product of Humanity. Humanity Should Own AI." was the title of their last article about this and I agree, in the long run nationalizing alone isn't enough and every human should have democratic say about its use

Removing the word actually from the title really confused me

A few days back there was a post saying the only ones making money with AI are the ones selling the hardware

I always have two books going. An important one I read at home in peace and one I can read on public transport because I don't have to / want to concentrate on it too hard.

Reading in public transport has helped me to read more often at home too

you could request somebody's data by just passing different id in url

Developers should feed their models the OWASP Website. This is known as IDOR. https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Insecure_Dire...

Well there isn't a world-government yet and which else government should nationalize these US companies? Of course, in the long run, we need to use these democratically across the whole world.

Sure. The criminals and political enemies of the EU will just use illegal chat apps and hardened phones. What about the others though?

The analysis is the critique. Marx whole work was basically just analyzing capitalism and the solutions come from this analysis. E.g., understanding how private ownership and competition lead to endless growth and the climate crisis.

Perhaps you should read a critique of capitalism by anticapitalists and not only The Economist

Facts aren't views.

The ones selling the shovels ;)

Did china invent VPNs yet?