HN user

miga

635 karma

Haskell & declarative language dev, blockchain and big data platform builder, former research nanoscientist.

migamake.com

miga.at.hn

Posts14
Comments301
View on HN

Because 8GiB is insufficient for most work in 2025, so cheap Macbook is simply better Chromebook at this point: https://videocardz.com/newz/pcgh-demonstrates-why-8gb-gpus-a...

And 16GiB VRAM insufficient for games:

https://videocardz.com/newz/pcgh-demonstrates-why-8gb-gpus-a...

Also, 3nm M4 is going head-to-head with older Ryzen AI 365 in everything except for power efficiency: https://nanoreview.net/en/cpu-compare/apple-m4-vs-amd-ryzen-...

When compared in multicore against Ryzen AI Pro laptops (high end), even Apple M5 are behind in the dust...

https://www.cpu-monkey.com/en/compare_cpu-amd_ryzen_ai_max_p...

Despite awesome progress with its latest ARM processors, Apple was caught behind Ryzen, and is threatened by next generation of Zen processors.

While I admire social-network-friendly websites, I am afraid that performance is too bad to allow its use instead of a social network.

Indeed it is so performance sensitive, that it has blocked my region. Would it not be better to get a static site generator from a standard Markdown posts, and thus assure it is both performant and accessible?

Sharing software to be tested for free seems an unalienable right of the company, and indeed many companies distribute free keys to testers.

Here author talks about taxing software that remains with the employee, as if it were "gift" or "taxable benefit" of employment, not an exercise of unalienable right to share software for testing.

Sounds more like tax office logic, instead of common sense.

Taxable benefit would occur if Microsoft bought software of others and gifted it to employee. Or if Microsoft could not reasonably expect people to actually test the software, or allowed them to resell it.

It seems like this article does not distinguish non-monetary "benefit" from employment from necessity that the company gives free license to use its software for testing.

Despite widespread knowledge that Open Access is more effective marketing of research, the ACM still clings on to non-open-access models outside of CACM.

ACM is among the few publishers in technology that still resist open access, and told to pay for it.

It is unfortunate sign that organization struggles to fulfill its mission in promotion of computing research, and is instead leaning on interests that are outside its mission statement.

"International law scholars consider the ECHR to be the most effective international human rights court in the world." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Court_of_Human_Rights...

There are 46 state members of Council of Europe: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Member_states_of_the_Council_o...

In principle human rights are considered civilizational legacy, and the opinions are highly considered by other courts. However, the public policy of particular states is often at odds with these opinions.