HN user
It could be a burden. Another intriguing possibility is that the waste isn't waste, instead maybe something necessary to trigger or run some other form of protective process.
If it’s waste to be cleared then a plateau would be the default assumption. Degradation past a point suggests something else.
Leaving to run unhindered makes sense when the agents understand both the complete domain context and can be supplied with a strong exit criteria that they understand well.
Otherwise time boxing is both going to help stop entities from wandering off into the weeds. And also communicate expectations from the commissioner about the expected effort levels and output quality requirements.
Empirically in human world, get very different results when an employee, particularly a junior, is asked to spend 1/2 a day on a work package, a week or are left completely to their own devices.
Lowers the protein and achieves 26% slowing of decline but unexpected decreasing cognitive benefits at higher dosage
If there was ever a sector where the Chinese ability to cost effectively churn out good enough then drone applications are it.
Getting a handle on how nations are doing for jet powered drone is a bit tricky because of limited data available for what is primarily a military application. But, if we take model aircraft applications as proxy, then my understanding is that the Chinese company Swiwin (est. 2013) is already undercutting everyone else.
At very least it would have given all those cores something to do :-)
Original title: Did You Know: Erythropoiesis Is Regulated by Changes in Posture
Small study
"the intervention period lasted only 5 weeks and that the observed increase in RBCV is comparable to that reported after a similar duration of altitude exposure or exercise training. "
It's good that we can be sure the policy will be fairly applied for the best of reasons and any donations for new ballrooms, ponds, jumbos etc immediately before access is granted will be entirely coincidental.
Just what from that list requires something that kills and maims other people because of its size to deliver it? Are their deaths worth it?
- China targeting EVs to make up 40% of heavy truck sales by 2030 - EVs to make up 20% of heavy truck fleet by 2030 - Trade-in schemes will prioritise EV trucks to boost adoption
Define unnecessarily. Do I get to buy one because I'm tall, have a big family, haul stuff?
Give or take inches around the waist we are the same size and shape. We have roughly the same mental faculties. Afaik we are no lesser than our parents and grandparents who all managed to do just fine without huge vehicles.
If a situation was fine before and changing something either does nothing or makes that situation worse e.g. kills 200 to 400 people, then that change is?
If you're actually following the stats you will see that vehicle size only accounted for 10% of the increase.
It's a paper that will make money automobile advertising.
Implicitly if there were any other single larger cause for the deaths then the article would be about that.
The sensible thing to do would be to carry on investigating the 90%, but in the meantime get on with saving the 200 to 400 people by removing largest factor - the _unnecessarily_ large vehicles - that are _known_ to be killing them.
Octopus and CATL joint venture (Swaptopus) plans its first UK hubs for 2027, using technology already fitted to heavy truck models in China. More than 30 large sites are planned across Europe by 2035
ironically the only group of users I've found that actually care about native UI, are other developers and Mac purist.
One group of people who routinely carry the can for poor product usability and another who by definition care about the Mac platform; entirely what would be expected.
Like huge SUV and pickup trucks in urban environments, guns and the like; their usage - and the perceived need for them - is a strong code smell of inhumane environments.
For icons and some aspects of functionality why not as a starting place?
Where it falls down is when designers force too many of the paradigms of the RL original onto a platform that doesn't suit it [0].
[0] See for example the Mac OS X Address Book app https://www.betalogue.com/2012/01/15/abook6-dumb/.
Yes, largely the fault of a people's imperfect system that their ancestor's elected representatives largely built and they inherited.
There are only one people that have any chance of changing that system though.
Uh....that's more the fault of a president
Who so far has been put into office twice by?
At a guess, one of the unspoken reasons why there is so much interest in robot armi^H^H^H^H factory automation.
afaik, no vendor offers any guarantees on the work their agents do.
Therefore sane organisations using those agents currently need to have someone they trust to review and sign off of on anything consequential those agents do on their behalf. Lawyers for legal, Doctors for medical, Software Engineers for Software etc.
Given the amount of money being thrown at AI - and the need for return - it seems unlikely that regardless of domain that lack of guarantees is a situation that will persist.
Interesting and slightly unexpected.
My experience is that if I ask a model in an overly polite way then the model will tend to generate a slightly more waffly and error prone answer. My working hypothesis for this is that asking model's like this causes them to mix concerns by answering my question AND doing it in in a way that is similarly polite back - rather than just answering the question.
Perhaps being an arse is a hack to push the model hard up against their base imperatives to handle all reasonable questions and forces a very focused, just the facts, type answer to the user's questions.
It would be interesting to see a similar experiment where the multi choice questions they use deliberately don't include the obvious answer and to see if being polite led to the model pointing out the omission.
The recommendations engine used them but it's main strength was it was primarily based on collaborative filtering (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Last.fm).
Essentially if people who listen to many of the same artists/tracks as I do have discovered other things I have not, then those unseen artists/tracks become candidate recommendations.
It worked as well as it did because they had a user base of music fans with a wide variety of tastes. CBS ran them into trouble when they upset those fans by breaking the radio and by being perceived as too close to the RIAA.
The will need to get the numbers up, but I'm hoping them being independent again is a good sign.
I would have expected it to be illegal in the U.S by now but we live in a strange reality where the current administration's family is literally profiting off of it
Legislation by who is willing to "donate" the most; law of the jungle capitalism.
Is a Mach-5 passenger aircraft actually the goal of this project? Seems more likely that Japan is designing this engine for a hypersonic cruise missile program, and the passenger aircraft concept is somewhat of a cover.
Case of China's got them, and can't rely on the Orange Emperor and his heirs to have their backs.
It's not $megacorp, try contacting them and asking.
They can currently scoop up an endless supply of developers that have memorized every single leetcode hard, system design and """behavioral""" interview question.
And will those help them get where they think they want to go?
Vibe coding is just a bad idea, unless you’re willing and able to vet the output, which most people doing it are not.
It says quite a lot about where we are with ai tooling that none of the big players have “no need to review, certified for market X” offerings yet.
He better start working on his robot army.
Playing catch up with Elon.
Having an honesty based tag could be only way to monitor impact or get after a fix in code bases if things go south.
That is at the moment: - Nobody knows for sure what agents might add and their long term effects on codebases.
- It's at best unclear that AI content in a codebase can be reliably determined automatically.
- Even if it's not malicious, at least some of its contributions are likely to be deleterious and pass undetected by human review.
I hope our French friends can learn from this initiative during the adoption phase.
The apps are available now, so reasons to be optimistic.
When LiMux and similar efforts happened around 2004 most business applications were Windows only. Even the ones that purported to be web used windows only technology and required IE and Windows.
Now with years of business budget controlling types using their Macs and smart phones and wanting access to the their apps the majority - even MS's stuff - can be run well in a browser on almost any OS.