lolcat_cowsay

could just use the torch

yeah very high percentage THC in nearly every variant of weed these days, for me having a joint with tiny sprinkles of weed completely fucks me up, I just choose to have hash with lower THC percentage, plus hash tastes nice. I think that the really strong stuff should be for medical patients, or people with really high tolerance, because for a teenager that doesn't know what it can do, it can really ruin them if they keep having it, especially since the strong stuff is more addictive aswell.

why is this downvoted

I'm not switching just yet because I don't know if podman fully supports docker compose yet.

Sounds nice and all but I really liked docker compose for setting up containers, I'll have to find out if podman has full docker compose support yet, then maybe I'll switch.

Last time I tested it, it had some downsides, but "last time" was like at the start of this year so things maybe might have improved since then.

I tried podman compose quite a few months ago with my docker compose file and it failed, what is the difference between doing that and this?

So like, you can use docker compose for podman instead of docker, instead of something like podman compose?

Nah no good alternative yet, I tried running my docker compose file which works perfectly with docker in podman compose and it failed outright.

BTW there's no alternative to docker compose in podman, I've tried running my docker compose file with podman compose and it just failed outright. Currently I'm going to stick with Docker because of this alone.

Completely agree, this professor is clearly an asshole.

What a stupid post

Duplicates: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22218181 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22233637

What about GTX 16xx users? I have a GTX 1650 which is based on Turing but doesn't have the new NVENC encoder, I wonder if the new OSS driver will support this GPU, if it has that RISCV chip that everyone's talking about.

what the fuck

Exactly, you have to know what you wanted to do before mastering the tool in the first place, this is true for a lot of things not just note-taking systems.

Interesting, so how is this Johnny decimal thing different to Zettelkasten?

That sounds exactly like Org-Mode inside Emacs.

I agree, this blog post is too long for what he was actually trying to say, he could of gotten his point through in a few paragraphs rather than an entire page, I'm surprised that I had the patience to read all of it today.

And it is extremely unhelpful to a lot of people aswell. It doesn't work for everyone.

Once I can recall something, that usually leads me to where I need to go. It's sometimes that initial failure to recall what I wanted to remember that can prevent me from acting until much later.

Exactly my frame of thinking, if I start worrying about structure, I forget the thing I wanted to write about in the first place.

I like Apple Notes, but it really sucks in a lot of ways. The search function is crappy as crap gets. I don't know how indexing could be so poor. There's no way to tag or label notes other than by placing notes in folders. Notes does nothing to try and help you extract meaning from your unstructured text.

It lets you get the job done quickly, you just remembered you had to write something down, you can just write it down as quick as possible without worrying about other nonsense.

What I want more than anything that tries to impose the job of organization on to the user is something that lets me treat it like a dumping ground, does its best to extract any implicit structure or meaning and keywords from my notes, lets me add relationships optionally, and then gets out of my way. I don't need silos or folders or schemas or graphs or any such nonsense.

Exactly, this is what I am thinking too, organization shouldn't be worried about when you just want to write something down NOW, as apposed to later after you've worried about organization and you've forgotten the thing you wanted to write about in the first place.

The actual thing that you are using the write notes on should do the organization itself, make tags automatically and link notes automatically, without you having to worry about anything, that for me, is the best way.

And you should be able to search through notes quickly and find keywords etc.. all just by looking at what is inside the notes that have any sort of structure.

lets me add relationships optionally

Totally agree, relationships should be worried about after the note has been written down, not before.

I’ve tried a bunch of these sorts of tools. And nothing stuck over the years.

Yeah same with me, I've tried many tools like Org-Roam inside Emacs which is yet another Zettelkasten type of system, doesn't really make sense for me.

So I just stuck to using plain text notes with whatever structure I want them to have, no standard structure, just whatever structure I want on a given day, and that is how I can actually get myself to write shit down, rather than wondering about structure and how this note links to that etc.

This is if he wants to take notes in the first place.

I completely agree with your points and they also relate with me a bit, Zettelkasten systems don't work for me at all, nor do TODO lists, it depends on the type of person, it doesn't work for everyone; I think what the author is trying to say is that Zettelkasten or other knowledge-based linking systems shouldn't be advertised to everyone as a "way to organise your thoughts", mainly because of the fact that it depends on the type of person, like an example is that as you mentioned, it works amazingly for you, but for me it doesn't really make sense with how I do things, I think that is what the author is trying to say.

I personally just create atomic (single-topic) notes, with tags in the YAML front-matter, and store them in a folder structure along the lines of the Johnny Decimal System[3]. I store checklists, procedures, howtos, concept summaries, cheatsheets, and a daily log stored in a YYYY-MM.markdown file.

You must be a very organised person, any sort of Zettelkasten or knowledge-based linking system for me is too complex, I'd rather just take a simple note, maybe with the date in the filename, to each their own I guess.

I rarely write TODO lists.

Its probably not for you then, people makes Zettelkasten look like a magical thing that will help you get more organised in life.

You would've "gotten" how to create a workflow that fits you by now if this is what you really wanted.

The problem with the Knowledge Graph ideology is that everything in your mind is already situated in a graph structure. That is precisely the problem. It’s big and complicated, with way too many connections everywhere. There’s no good in replicating that web in digital form.

I completely agree with this, I'm not an organised person, I rarely write TODO lists, yet in Emacs with Org-Roam I thought I would be highly productive because I would start writing notes and linking them together or whatever magic Org-Mode has inside Emacs (if I can even be bothered to write a TODO list in the first place);

But I don't think Org-Roam is for me, I rarely wrote TODO lists even before using Org-Roam, and I'd have never heard of Zettelkasten or whatever until trying out Org-Roam, you could say that I'm not an organised person, and that is true, but I don't care.

Using a Zettelkasten system for people like me isn't going to work, it will never feel right to be honest, in the first place before trying it out I didn't want any of this stuff anyway, I don't need a graph linking notes together, I'm a simple man, just write a few notes sometimes.

Bloat

Gemini's search engine

Advice to anyone who wants to start using XMonad, READ the docs..

I am going to eventually support the devs behind XMonad aswell, it is such an amazing project...

XMonad has tags: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/xmonad-contrib-0.16/docs...