"Market forces" is just another way of saying "individual choices". Restricting individual choices has certainly been practised across a number of political and economic systems but there is always a question - who decides what to restrict?
HN user
klearvue
Here is a real business (albeit an Estonian one): https://www.leapin.eu/
Apologies for correcting but it's "a number of people", not "an amount". "People" are countable.
The article's title is "Senseless". HN's title, I believe, is bound to distort one's impression of helmets' usefulness.
Did anyone else have to re-read the title a few times?
I was following the news from the conflict in Ukraine and when the plane got downed, pro-Russia rebels were celebrating all over the internet (thinking that they'd downed a Ukrainian supply plane). When it became obvious the plane was civilian, the celebratory posts and videos started to disappear with blazing speeds.
Alt+F2 in KDE to bring up KRunner but you can change it to whatever keys you like
I am your guy hitting his head after a cycling accident and being fine afterwards. Would it surprise you that, in spite of being fine, it is right AFTER this accident that I decided to start wearing a helmet? Judging by your argument, you would call me illogical.
We use honeypot field and timegate trap on our site forms - so far very successfully.
What can you possibly mean? It's open source i.e. code is available to anyone's inspection.
"speaking against class privilege, now...", "anybody talking against mass immigration...will easily be classified as 'hate speaker' too" - please cite a single law of any European country classifying those as hate speech. Up until then I'll say you are spouting utter rubbish.
It's only acceptable to use "she" if the character in question is positive. Using "she" or stock photos depicting females to refer to a negative character is sexist.
Upvoted for a very good post. Just a small note - it's "heroin". "Heroine" means something entirely different :)
From a developer's perspective - perhaps. But look at it from a business perspective (cost, risk management), and you'll often see it differently.
In the example given "listen 80;" is completely unnecessary since it's a default.
Check out Open Atrium 2.0
Here is an intro video: http://vimeo.com/66247216
Paxman can be quite aggressive, and I would say justifiably, with politicians trying to avoid answering a question. For another side of Paxman see this interview with Christopher Hitchens - http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00r2c42
The title of the blog is ... "Linux Blog" and the author may very well have no time/resources/desire to check whether his writing is also applicable elsewhere.
Please re-examine your close-mindedness; Drupal has an amazing community when it comes to welcoming new contributors.
I use KDE because I like my desktop set up the way I like it, not the way some developers think I should. (also Yakuake's, KDE terminal emulator, "Open window when the mouse pointer touches the screen edge" has become such a second nature to me that I keep shoving the mouse to the top of the screen even if I'm on someone else's machine)
Clementine
Both parties don't come off well here - the buyer could have given the seller the benefit of the doubt before posting a negative feedback over a trivial amount and the seller managed to turn an unjustified, in my opinion, negative feedback into a terrible publicity for itself.
Because "Be Good" can be ambiguous, e.g. it's also equivalent to "Don't Be Bad [at doing something]".
Zimbra is one.
My bet is he meant Reagan.
Depends on the number of tabs one tends to have open. On Ubuntu your (a) and (b) are far worse for me in Chrome than in Firefox (in fact that much worse that I only use Chrome on my 8GB RAM laptop but not on a 4GB one). I agree with (c).
Sure, not from litre ones, there's too much binge drinking already :) But the half-a-litre glasses, common in metric countries, are a very close replacement to pints in terms of volume.
I think the title of the article is unnecessarily provocative considering recent political and military events. It might not be intentional but a little more thought into the title could have resulted in something with less political overtones, say, "Supporting Israel's Start-Up Community".
Dear Jono,
It may very well be that RMS's comments were over the top but please check the numbers on DistroWatch - those numbers will testify that Canonical is not making the right decisions, at least not on the desktop, and RMS's sentiments are quite likely shared by plenty of your former users.
I've no idea if their service actually works but if it does, it's illegal in the EU and it would also be illegal for their clients to use such information to e-mail those visitors.
EDIT: talking about relead.com mentioned in a g+ reply.