' itself (!) may not convey information, but it's existence does convey information.
While making it a keyword may help beginners to understand code and wish they could see the meaning directly, because they don't know the meaning of certain symbols yet, people who know the language and productively produce code are more concerned about content rather than syntax.
Content meaning the name of the life time, the name of the types, the name parameters, the structure of the types, the constraints on the types, etc.
Especially for Rust, there is a lot of the things mentioned above, and since the concepts in Rust aren't easy, it's important that these things get as much space as possible from the limited space on the screen, instead of wasting it by self explaining syntax elements, which are trivial to memorize.
Thus { instead of begin_function_body, *; instead of statement_end, ? instead of 'if err != nil then return err' and ' instead of lifetime.
Because pretty much any other language has '...' for strings, or at least something to do with text.
The ' aren't used in places where strings occur (strings just don't make sense there anyways), don't take up to much space (i.e. give more space to the name).
I am not a Rust pro, but this has never been an issue for me, same for ! for macro expansions.
not only is it a shitty source of income, it also exposes you to sexism, racism and makes you tolerate shit things, because your income could be at risk standing up for yourself.
When creating a Megolm session in a room, clients must share the corresponding session key using Olm with the intended recipients, so that they can decrypt future messages encrypted using this session. An m.room_key event is used to do this. Clients must also handle m.room_key events sent by other devices in order to decrypt their messages.
Given that users can access their messages without interaction with people at Telegram, automatic aggregation of the cloud data for single end points is in place.
In consequence the data can be accessed from a single jurisdiction anyways.
you mean user1 button? It would throw away the previous http request and users 1 data wouldn't even show up
Hiding the elements/div would prevent the user from clicking that button.
I don't see how it is 20/80.
Switchmap is just a different way of doing things, and hiding the deiv instead of blocking doesn't add really add more effort as well.
So I don't see how it's a lot of effort while also missing a lot of the desired features?
it doesn't really maximize individual liberty, ultimately almost anyone would end up with less liberty in practice, except for people choosing to centralize power i.e. rejecting anarchism