HN user

joombaga

873 karma
Posts1
Comments556
View on HN

I'm with you. My current code is a superset of the task I'm trying to accomplish, test code, leftovers from experiments, etc. I often have to break it up into logical chunks that get merged separately. I tried the jj flow and it's just not my thing. Git matches my mental model exactly, but I used it second (after subversion) and in my most formative years as a developer. Maybe there's a universe out there where things worked out differently.

Software jobs for sure, but I've been applying for jobs with employers that have other types of jobs too (nursing, accounting, industrial engineering, etc.) and the requirement is not solely for their software jobs. Some have fields that pattern match (for these I put something like "https://linkedin.com/I_DO_NOT_USE_LINKEDIN") while others use an integration that actually require you to sign in to Linkedin (some of these I've created accounts for and then deleted them, some I've managed to bypass by hacking on the POST a bit, and others I've decided not to apply for).

I would not have expected the model's baseline training data to presume not to delete files it didn't author. If the project existed before you started using the model then it would not have created any of the files, and denying the ability to delete files at all is quite restrictive. You may consider putting such files in .gitignore, which Cursor ignores by default.

Which is a bit annoying, as I don't really know what to do with AppImages.

They're self-contained. You make them executable and run them. Store them in /use/local/bin or wherever you want.

They mean `/resume`. But the shortcuts are Ctrl+B to toggle branch, Ctrl+V to preview, and Ctrl+R to rename, at least on my machine.

Is it a pint? 4 months ago

I'm having trouble understanding these 2 claims from the summary:

1 in 2 pints delivered less than 14.4 oz (below 90%)

37.9% were significantly short (under 90% of claimed volume)

Aren't those the same claim with different percentages? 1 in 2 is 50%, and 50% is less than 37.9%

Consider using work trees. They have separate reflogs, you'd still get separate directories, but less duplication.

With `tail` you can press enter a few times to put some empty lines after the last line. This is useful e.g. when you trigger a function multiple times and want to easily see line groups from each attempt. It's the only reason I still use `tail` for following when `less` is available.