jjallen

No, it wasn't. I had it in there from the get go. I did not edit my comment for any reason, I don't think at least. Like I said in the original comment, you can be moderate/non-partisan and think this is a bad idea. You can think Trump's an idiot and still think birthright citizenship is a bad idea. That's all.

You can be pro/fine with legal immigration (and moderate/non-partisan) and still not think birthright citizenship is a good idea (like I do).

Also ~95% of countries don't have unconditional birthright citizenship. It creates perverse incentives.

Reminds me of legal abortion: practically everywhere in the world has it. If you are not in that vast majority you should be taking a very close look at yourself/things.

So yes, let's amend the constitution. It's been a while and we do it on average every ten years or so. I have personally not ever been involved in one.

It's done to increase EPS per share and return cash to ongoing shareholders in a more tax friendly way, yes.

I’m disappointed and surprised you left out half of the conditions that grant him this compensation. You only included the one that suggests that all he has to do is buy a bigger company with GME stock. It was literally the first paragraph of your link:

“ The award is divided into nine tranches that are eligible to vest only if the Company achieves both a “Market Capitalization Hurdle” and a corresponding “Cumulative Performance EBITDA Hurdle”.”

This changes basically everything. He can’t just buy any bigger company. The company has to earn way more cash flow, cumulatively, as well.

I’m disappointed and surprised you left out half of the conditions that grant him this compensation and only included one that suggests that all he has to do is buy a bigger company with GME stock:

“ The award is divided into nine tranches that are eligible to vest only if the Company achieves both a “Market Capitalization Hurdle” and a corresponding “Cumulative Performance EBITDA Hurdle”.”

This changes basically everything. He can’t just buy any bigger company. The company has to earn way more cash flow as well.

They refused to refund me $200 when I had both a claude code subscription and the other thing. I had been using credits or something. Essentially double paying. And they just refused.

My current guess is that you get much or most of the benefits, but not all (by both value and number). If you look at the actual changes in the body during both of these activities, most are the same as exercise, but not all.

For example: body temp increases, heart rate increases, and we sweat. But the muscles aren't "engaged", consuming stuff (glycogen, etc.) while doing sauna.

There could also be sauna benefits that exercise does not impart, or is less likely to do so: sweating greater than exercise could lead to excess excretion of plastics, carcinogens, etc.

Running in mild/cold temps we do little sweating (unless long duration exercise), whereas every darn sauna at sufficiently high temps we are going to be sweating.

Also AI could help you pick those skills up again faster, although you wouldn’t need to ever pick those skills up again unless AI ceased to exist.

What an interesting paradox-like situation.

Governmental filings are not PR and either are lawsuits. The lawsuit was won or at the very least validated by a judge.

No. I figured it was almost completely if not completely about OpenAI. These things tend to be quite lengthy and I do not have an hour to devote to reading things that don’t directly impact me or my family of profession these days.

Yes I am sure of the second part based on the government’s own publicly available tweets and lawsuits that have been filed.

I do wonder exactly what he was doing to be considered a snake. I know he was working on other things, but what else was going on?

I mean he quit what he considered to be a problematic company, founded another one, that one’s models refused to do things that the previous company would do, then his new company refused to do the US government’s evil bidding while the other company happily went along with it.

Not small differences to me.

I’ve never been annoyed with YouTube search. Product is great as far as I’m concerned. Love YouTube all around.

Make me an offer.

For kicks and giggles and because my wife was born in Yugoslavia I bought Yugoslavia.org a few years ago. Would like to do something meaningful with it.

This is not just OpenAI though. I don’t think this is new in general for these AI chat apps. Claude at the very least asks a question as the last part of its responses I believe every time.

It gave me a very wrong intro starting lesson number after saying I was second from the most advanced level and answering 26/26 of the intro questions correctly. It was showing me things like what does the 1st most common verb mean, etc. Just FYI.

Like what would that look like? US citizens being shot in the back of the head by government agents? On a weekly basis?

Not sure why anyone thinks a judges order is worth anything in the USA anymore. I am not reassured at all.

This is definitely Barbara Streisanding right now. I had never heard of OpenCode. But I sure have now! Will have to check it out. Doubt I’ll end up immediately canceling Claude Code Max, but we’ll see.

Very cool. Was thinking about working onthis myself after moving in a house 4 months ago with these to all of a sudden ahve to replace them for no good reason.

Exactly. If it is used a certain way by enough people, that is also an accepted definition. Dictionaries lag actual speech and language I suppose.

+1 for cudarc. I've been using it for a couple of years now and has worked great. I'm using it for financial markets backtesting.

Because of public family trees potentially linking a genome to a family, no dna is fully anonymous these days.

Clearly not.

Are they going to reinvest these funds into educations so our country can fill these roles or just waste it on weapons and unwinnable wars?

I would be totally fine with this if it was the former, but I would bet that it won't be...

I have not and don’t run an adblocker fwiw.

Thought about this some more. I think you want to start at 100% or high so people actually learn what needs to be learned: what malignant skin conditions actually look like.

And then once they have learned you get progressively harder and harder. Basically the closer to 50% you are the harder it will be to have a score higher than chance/50%.

Very cool. I learned a lot as a non dermatologist but someone with a sister who has had melanoma at a very young age.

I went from 50% to 85% very quickly. And that’s because most of them are skin cancer and that was easy to learn.

So my only advice would be to make closer to 50% actually skin cancer.

Although maybe you want to focus on the bad ones and get people to learn those more.

This was way harder than I thought this detection would be. Makes me want to go to a dermatologist.