itomato

HP-UX support might make a compelling retirement project for someone.

"Mom, I want ..."

"No, there is ... at home."

"At home..."

They asked ChatGPT for the ideal crossover product and now the dog is wagging.

This year, not me.

In five? Everybody but me.

MSFT used to be flat. What happened?

No “reset” can fix the Red Ring of Death.

" Ovens Inc. doesn’t live off selling ovens (for now). It lives off raising rounds. And rounds are raised with projections, and projections are manufactured out of whatever sales promises. The “No problem” people are also the only life raft."

Ever try make a product using Google Glass?

one time, while communing with Nature, I looked up at the transpiring coastal tree line flexing in the wind and I uttered, "pumps."

My hunch is that torsion, flex and their effect on the capillary structures are at play, but I haven't been able to step away from CS myself.

You're similarly not limited by what you can readily understand.

Being comfortable with the default level of trust is one thing. Command of the code is another.

By running the generated code at all, you've found some acceptable level of trust and comfort.

Scaling that comfort and trust seems to be the obvious move.

Code review works for me.

My friends made similar jokes about my setup. Called it 'Euclid'.

If X is their platform, let them choke on it.

Thinking that the range of capabilities is a setup todo list.

Particularly storage.

It’s an off the shelf SOM.

Audiophiles are safe from this device.

We did. We just didn’t classify it with a hashtag.

Frankenstein couldn’t build a monster without influence. Same thing here.

“CCNA? I’ll show you CCNA…”

Yes, but you didn’t mention anything that would suggest a need to ‘maintain’.

It doesn’t change.

Many people keep swapping gear in so they can learn BGP on Cisco edge gear or run clusters on salvaged IB.

OP is not that person.

100%. Tell synaptic to find the best mirror and go.

https://s-t-d.org/

I really enjoyed the 'security tools distribution'

What does the relationship between frontier and flagship capability look like when mapped to actual adoption and user habits?

This is like advertising the latest achievements during Space Race, when Johnny just wants a Space Helmet and “friendly futuristic AI robot helping humanity, glowing blue eyes, white glossy body, holographic interface, floating transparent screens, digital particles, neural network background, cinematic lighting, volumetric god rays, ultra detailed, hyper realistic, 8K, masterpiece, award-winning, octane render, Unreal Engine 5, ray tracing, sharp focus, dramatic composition, vibrant blue and purple color palette, futuristic technology, innovation, hope, smiling business professionals, depth of field”

If this Sailfish phone is 700 and Commodore's is 500, I know which Sailfish device I can pay attention to.

Why are people using what used to be Twitter in seriousness?

This should also compile to WASM, and support WebGPU, not that I’m advocating for it.

…while inside Jira working on a ticket.

https://github.com/wjkennedy/jira-quake3

You’re thinking of Facebook, and you can still get that.

Spam is not the way to win hearts and minds

Macromedia Flash vibes.

Don’t stop.

Beowulf time?

I had been maintaining a fork of the U of KY BDR with SBCs and Arm devices in mind, might need to revive it for RISC-V.

Yes, and if they have done the hard work to deliver features in the kernel that provide a moat, that blob is the hardware.

Reversing and reimplementing the closed bits are what I want my Buildroot pipelines to do.

That’s my use case though; targeting COTS devices with (mainline) Linux support that don’t do all they could.

I have done it the ugly way (in production) and I want elegance in my old age.

I heard it’s going to be called emacs.

All games are free then?