Local models are good? Or are we saying that open source/open weights models are good? What I'm asking is, are they good because they are "local" or are they good because you can install and run them yourself, wherever you want? Same node, different node, different cluster, way out in the ether/cloud...
Nope. 2000s would refer to the century. We're still in the 2000s and still early. The Wright brothers flew the first plane in the early 1900s. Accurate. Ford introduced the Model T in the late 1900s, inaccurate. 1908 was not the late 1900s.
"...came to widespread attention in the late 2000s..." Weird. I thought we were all living in the year 2026, which seems like the early 2000s to me. Huh...
Nopes. I'm strongly suggesting that we already had a frigging word for these things, that's also still valid AF today, and it's "word processor." Not f'n writerdeck or whatever. Dumb.
You're not gettin' the point. There's nothing here if you think about it for 10 seconds. Any ancient anything, could run vi, or vim, or Emacs, or friggin' wordstar, natively or via emulation or WHATEVER. There's nothing here.
No. A friend of mine worked at United Record Pressing. The majority of the masters they received from customers were commercial CDs. No special master.
"Nvidia." Not NVidia or nVidia, or the other ways. I feel that I can frequently figure out if someone is going to express a negative view about this company based only on whether they picked a weird way to write their name.
They are talking specifically about ARM cores designed by and licensable from ARM Holdings (the company), not other designs that don't use ARM's designs (like the Apple silicon).
Might it make sense for doctors or pharmaceutical companies, in some cases, to intentionally utilize grapefruit to increase absorption of certain drugs? Specifically expensive ones? Especially in the cases where the patients aren't prescribed other drugs that may interact with grapefruit.