HN user

esgwpl

85 karma
Posts2
Comments20
View on HN

"run this daemon that tries to beat the kernel OOM to the punch"

Considering that the kernel OOM killer tends to be way too late in doing its thing I don't see how this is inelegant, maybe there's a reason you can't just have the kernel kill processes earlier in the face of memory pressure.

and yet the defensiveness is so reflexively strong

It's hard not to get defensive because this reddit post is basically flamebait:

use of words like sapping and deadend

"there's little to no payoff for the rest of humanity"

Like you said we can probably discuss this question without getting defensive but it's impossible thanks to the way it's worded.

The kernel is different from userspace projects - more difficult in some respects (we use a lot of very odd header files that pushes the boundary of what can be called "C"), but easier in many other respects (mainly in the sense that the kernel is fairly self-contained, and then doesn't rely on other projects for the final binary).

I'm interested in what Torvalds meant by these odd header files, does anyone know?

Linux 5.10 6 years ago

This being an LTS release made me wonder: why do distros with long support cycle like RHEL not come with LTS kernel?

Linux 5.8-rc1 6 years ago

Not a lot, you can see it on the development statistics that LWN releases for every major kernel releases, for 5.7, it's only about 13-14%, so most people working on the kernel do indeed get paid for it.

https://lwn.net/Articles/821813/

I believe AGESA 1.0.0.4 Patch B broke something for the APUs, you should try either upgrading or downgrading your BIOS but what worked for me was downgrading to AGESA 1.0.0.3 ABB, both Windows and Linux has stopped crashing now, although I still get the occasional lockup when browsing with Firefox on Linux. I found out the culprit after stumbling into this thread: https://old.reddit.com/r/AMDHelp/comments/gj9kpz/bsod_new_pc...