HN user

epe

487 karma

http://www.ubermac.net/ http://twitter.com/eentzel [ my public key: https://keybase.io/eentzel; my proof: https://keybase.io/eentzel/sigs/JANKqR2wwf1qpsWnqqZrH2O0g4M_a4_An5e1kwaQ79E ]

Posts10
Comments63
View on HN

Agreed that the web doesn't have any "magical properties", but it has the "Worse is Better" survival characteristic; or at least it did in its early days. I think the web's continued dominance depends on the extent to which it retains those characteristics.

I think the snake-oil nature of (much of) SEO stems from the fact that it's difficult or impossible to measure in an accurate, unambiguous way. Since A/B testing includes measurement by its very nature, I suspect it will be more resistant to snake oil.

Wouldn't simply excluding any http request whose user agent contains "googlebot" from the displayed count make it dramatically more accurate without needing a switch to JS-based analytics?

This is my November Startup Sprint[0] project, inspired by a StackExchange question[1] from this HN thread[2]. The idea is that the app creates a unique email address for you, and any emails of the form "Lunch with Bill Tuesday at 12:30" that you send to that address will be added to your Google Calendar. I'd love to hear what HN thinks of it. Much thanks to HN user riskish for his design help.

[0] http://hn.21times.org/

[1] http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/7139/add-an-event...

[2] http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1861283

Beautiful Failure 16 years ago

There's no idea that a single class might have two versions and that some bits of the program depend on the old version and some on the new. Why not? Why isn't live, running code versioned and transactioned so that we can release a patch of a few classes into a running server without taking it down? It should be possible for the old code to handle all of the existing requests and then get garbage collected when it has no further dependencies.

Isn't this also something that Smalltalk can do?

Can you elaborate? Pool.com appears to some sort of domain name broker at the moment. While it may not be the most reputable business ever, it seems like it's a cut or two above scamming people into subscribing to some $10/month horoscope service under false pretenses.