HN user

eindiran

3,836 karma
Posts69
Comments872
View on HN
news.ycombinator.com 2y ago

Ask HN: Resources for finding dotfiles and config files

eindiran
1pts2
medium.com 2y ago

Building a string art machine

eindiran
135pts19
math.uchicago.edu 2y ago

Expander Graphs [pdf]

eindiran
3pts0
en.wikipedia.org 2y ago

Fibonacci Word

eindiran
1pts0
omniglot.com 3y ago

Cree Syllabics (2002)

eindiran
53pts13
ciechanow.ski 3y ago

Exposing Floating Point (2019)

eindiran
71pts29
en.wikipedia.org 3y ago

Gabriel's horn

eindiran
4pts0
www.wsj.com 3y ago

Juul Secures Financing to Avoid Bankruptcy, Plans to Cut 30% of Jobs

eindiran
1pts1
www.hyrumslaw.com 4y ago

Hyrum's Law

eindiran
125pts36
tanelpoder.com 5y ago

Peeking into Linux kernel-land using /proc filesystem (2013)

eindiran
1pts0
cerebralab.com 5y ago

Machine learning could be fundamentally unexplainable

eindiran
3pts0
codegolf.stackexchange.com 5y ago

Generating the longest error message in C++

eindiran
1pts0
en.wikipedia.org 5y ago

Unconventional Computing

eindiran
1pts0
devblogs.microsoft.com 5y ago

The sad story of Korean jamo (2020)

eindiran
16pts0
news.ycombinator.com 5y ago

Ask HN: What RSS feeds are you subscribed to?

eindiran
5pts5
www.youtube.com 5y ago

3Blue1Brown: Hamming Codes [video]

eindiran
25pts2
simonsingh.net 5y ago

The Beale Treasure Ciphers

eindiran
3pts1
hackflow.com 6y ago

Why Every Language Needs Its Underscore

eindiran
5pts1
en.wikipedia.org 6y ago

1989 California Medfly Attack

eindiran
213pts99
www.cbsnews.com 6y ago

SpaceX postpones historic launch due to weather

eindiran
1pts0
en.wikipedia.org 6y ago

Ariadne's Thread (Logic)

eindiran
2pts0
en.wikipedia.org 6y ago

Condorcet Paradox

eindiran
1pts0
www.hyrumslaw.com 6y ago

Hyrum's Law

eindiran
3pts0
news.ycombinator.com 6y ago

Ask HN: Does anyone else also have a thick black line at the top of the screen?

eindiran
12pts7
twitter.com 6y ago

An Amusing Bug

eindiran
1pts0
medium.com 6y ago

Intellectual Dark Matter

eindiran
12pts2
en.wikipedia.org 6y ago

Cyclopamine

eindiran
2pts0
en.wikipedia.org 6y ago

Paideia

eindiran
1pts0
en.wikipedia.org 6y ago

Erdős–Bacon number

eindiran
48pts35
en.wikipedia.org 6y ago

Bitonic Sorter

eindiran
1pts0

you really need to have a specific reason to choose something outside of bash/zsh/fish

The reason in question is that not that long ago, people said "you really need to have a specific reason to choose something outside of bash", and people choosing to go off the beaten path lead to zsh and fish becoming powerful and way more popular/well-supported than they were before.

Tufte CSS 11 months ago

The first four words on that page include the name of the author "Dave Liepmann" which != Tufte

A lot of my friends are professors or lecturers at universities with "motivationally-diverse" undergraduate populations; LLM-based cheating has become so common that they often reward higher marks to poorly-written papers, just by virtue of them not having been written by *GPT et al.

That Wiki page even has a section about the RH:

The Riemann hypothesis is noteworthy for its appearance on the list of Hilbert problems, Smale's list, the list of Millennium Prize Problems, and even the Weil conjectures, in its geometric guise. Although it has been attacked by major mathematicians of our day, many experts believe that it will still be part of unsolved problems lists for many centuries. Hilbert himself declared: "If I were to awaken after having slept for a thousand years, my first question would be: Has the Riemann hypothesis been proved?"

I am generally open to this idea, but this particular way of defining what bundles are allowed or not seems incredibly weak. Take Adobe's Creative Cloud. There is almost no one in the world who uses all of the tools in it. There are dozens of alternatives made by other companies that only cover a single component software. Adobe is the market leader with virtually all of the component pieces of software. Why is the US not targeting Adobe with antitrust for bundling together tools for typesetters, marketers, video editors, animators, etc, etc?

The thing that makes them "caustic or acidic" is that they are acidic (~3pH), by virtue of having dissolved carbon dioxide (ie carbonic acid) + acidic preservatives in them. You are putting them into your stomach (with your gastric acid, ~2pH). If you spilled your stomach contents on the concrete shipping dock repeatedly, it would weaken the concrete much faster. Now, I don't drink soda and they are objectively bad for your teeth, but the fact that they eat away at concrete does not seem like the right reason to avoid them.

OP's "cannot be used for bezos yacht" problem is about discriminatory licenses. If you don't care that eg Amazon can use your software, there is nothing at odds with what OP sees as a problem (discrimiatory licenses that violate points 5 or 6 of the OSD[0]).

[0] https://opensource.org/osd

Not OP, but Mautam in bamboo is another: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mautam

Some other interesting links:

- On bamboo in particular (semelparous and allochronic like cicadas): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bamboo_blossom

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allochronic_speciation

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semelparity_and_iteroparity

- On cicadas and their reproductive periods: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodical_cicadas

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_eel : same pattern, but using 2 and 3 as their primes.

The 3 things mentioned so far are governed by very different regulatory regimes:

- Using a camera drone to spot game will fall under the purview of both Federal and state level Fish and Game/Wildlife departments, eg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Department_of_Fish_... AFAIK this is not federally illegal, so there should be plenty of places where you can do this in the US.

- Drone (I assume you mean some quadcopter UAV) with a gun falls under FAA guidelines. You can't intentionally destroy them in flight or attach weapons to them for the same reason that you can't do that with planes: they are aircraft and the FAA doesn't want to deal with you shooting down aircraft. Since the FAA is federal, you can't do this anywhere in the US.

- Robot with a gun falls under ATF guidelines, specifically ATF letters that indicate certain classes of electronic trigger are effectively a machine gun and fall under the purview of the NFA. Same as point 2, the ATF rules will apply federally. If you have the relevant licensing, which I think would fall under a Class 2 SOT FFL, you can hook a firearm up to a robot since you are legally allowed by the ATF to manufacture machine guns. Most (?) of the Youtubers who have given guns to those offbrand Spots are doing it legally under the supervision of a Class 2 SOT.

- The autonomous robot with a gun would fall under the third point, as I am unaware of any rulings about specifically autonomous stuff, though someone could potentially make the argument that past rulings on booby traps could apply.

None of this directly answers the OP question about whether the 2nd amendment applies, but broadly federal regulation has moved past "shall not be infringed", so what the relevant federal agencies actually de facto allow is more to the point.

registration

If you purchase a firearm from an FFL anywhere in the United States, you are required to fill out an ATF form 4473 and do a NICS background check. There isn't a giant database of all firearms in the US indexed by owner and serial number, but those 4473s do exist and are handed over to the Federal government pretty regularly by FFLs.

licensing

In most places (eg those with "Constitutional Carry"), the only license you need is to not be a prohibited person (not mentally ill, a felon, no violent misdemeanors involving stalking or domestic violence) and old enough to purchase a gun in the relevant state. But if we just go by raw population, most people in the US would need to go through a more substantial process.

The Flipper Zero is a small-form computing device that is immensely popular, not particularly niche.

Any(sic) incredibly small number of engineers and scientists would ever use this device.

I personally know over a dozen people who own them and have tinkered with them in various ways. I managed to "break" my air conditioner unit (permanently setting it to C, not that bad of a "break") with one. Definitely less popular than a Pi or Arduino, but growing in popularity very fast.

Yes, but "cost effectiveness" means very different things sometimes. If, for example a hypothetical country were to have huge stores of old equipment to throw at a problem, losing material from the stockpile doesn't actually "cost" the value of producing the stuff new would. Or a hypothetical country with a massive industrial base, fighting a minor proxy war that is politically unpopular at home. Or a hypothetical country, with a tiny population and no native industry, fighting a massive power in a long-lasting guerrilla campaign using material donated from regional powers. Etc, etc.

Most modern wars are contests of attrition and logistics and bringing down political will to continue to fight

This second point is very well taken; I would extend it even further -- wars have always been contests of attrition, logistics, and political will, but this has been sharply highlighted in all the major conflicts since the turn of the 20th century.

You're comparing a no-ads[0], slow-moving, text-based feed (that has a maximum number of content pieces on the main pages at any given time) designed around fostering a specific tech-related community to an infinite, doomscrolling, video-based brainwashing machine filled with ads, violence, fear-mongering, propaganda, and softcore pornography designed as a skinner box to maximize engagement and consumption. HN has plenty of problems, but it is not even remotely comparable to TikTok/IG/etc.

[0] except the YC jobs ads