eckelhesten

Small subset of prompts? You mean literally every Kreti and Pleti who lets Claude go through their entire codebase is considered ”small subset of prompts”?

Kek

Not the guy you responded to, but I would assume ”they keep it safe” somewhere in a cold storage. Just in case they decide to train on it in a later phase.

Think of it as the Big Data hype some years ago.

It’s an interesting concept, perhaps it could go more from ”narrated slide show” to ”video clip” in the near future if it doesn’t cost too much.

Are you using it in an agentic workflow? Just reading the codebase will consume a lot of cached tokens, but seemingly, z.ai counts these as normal input tokens the way they're rate limiting.

I just read it and honestly it left an even worse taste in my mouth.

GLM-5.2 and GLM-5-Turbo are advanced models designed to rival Claude Opus model. Its usage will be deducted at 3 × during peak hours and 2 × during off-peak hours.

Claude certainly does not punish me for using their best models. Why should this "up and coming" company do it?

I thought the up and coming ai companies was supposed to have some kind of leverage in terms of price/performance (see deepseeks insanely cheap V4 flash and pro).

Try pointing it to a small codebase, or even ask it to conjure information found online.

You'll see that it quickly gives up. Thing is, they seem to count cached hits as if they were the non-cached tokens.

I wont be subscribing again thats for sure. I am not paying iPhone money for a Xiaomi.

Sure, but whatever you do, don't buy their (Z.ai) lite plan.

I feel like i threw 15 dollars in the sea. I'm getting rate limited after 3-4 prompts. You get way less value than just paying 25 dollars for Claude or OpenAI models.

Are they though? Microsoft is still in the eating paste phase of their journey. Copilot was a huge flop.

My take on detoxing from doomscroller apps was to uninstall their phone app and use their web version instead. The experience is so much less rewarding that i barely open instagram any longer. This is the only thing that worked for me. I even tried MDM:ing my devices once...

I’m curious to why not all modern PC/console game developers use this technology to create realistic graphics in their games?

If my old phone can render it with fairly high frame rate, I’m sure a full game with realistic graphics would work well on a mid/high end PC.

Ahhh yes, the mafia who got bullied and fought back.

Look, I’m all for the Iranian gov to cease. But don’t pretend that the US and it’s scoundrels aren’t the mafia and criminals in this matter.

What do you think daddy NATO would do about your little network cable? You are living in a fictional world.

They’d simply tell whoever’s crying to start using dynamic routing protocols and accept the few more ms in latency.

That's a naive way of thinking. You're saying "oh, they are thieves in this way, but they surely wouldn't be thieves in this other way!"

If you have no problems shitting on tens of thousands of authors of books, you don't have problems shitting on your customers as well (which they have proved again and again, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook–Cambridge_Analytica_d...)

Let's just say I wholeheartedly disagree with your viewpoint and leave it there :)

Sure, and I won’t collect or otherwise store your credit card info if you send it to me. Trust me bro :)

No but seriously, I am astonished by the level of trust you have for these for-profit companies. I’ll remind you of this quote:

”Zuckerberg: People just submitted it. Zuckerberg: I don't know why. Zuckerberg: They "trust me" Zuckerberg: Dumb fucks”

Meta is based in the US, yet they torrented TERABYTES worth of books to feed their AI.

I’m not trying to be negative here, but your point is invalidated by that particular event in itself.

Well, the context was running the models via open router, not hosting 800B> models yourself. Of course, if given the option I believe most people would pick ”don’t share sensitive data”.

What I’m trying to say is that EVERYONE uses your data, even the sensitive type. So you might aswell use an endpoint that does what it says and treat EVERY endpoint whether that’s OpenAI or anthropic as if it’s collecting all of your data.

The models doesn’t get better by themselves. You’re naive.

As opposed to?

Do you really think OpenAI, Anthropic or any other entity in the same business respects your data?

The Chinese AI companies who release open weights actually deserve whatever input you give them. They are the reason why there is competition and not duopolies in the domain.

At least that’s what they’re telling you. It’s a ”trust me bro” scenario.

I’d rather use the phone home version (deepseeks own endpoint). The benefit is that I’m fairly certain that they actually host the model I’m paying for.

That's because 4k on a 43 inch TV is lodpi

Honestly I’d prefer Chinese backdoors over western ones. China is still a land far far away and I couldn’t care less about what they’d do with my data, unlike western alphabet boys who could freeze my accounts and assets for ”wrongthinking” in the future.

You seem to see everything from a binary perspective. China bad, Taiwan good. Russia bad, Ukraine good.

The world is more nuanced than that.

But to answer your question. No we should not give anyone automatic kill bots. Automatic kill bots shouldn’t even be a thing.

Hard decision by Anthropic, but at least they can sleep well at night knowing their products doesn’t kill human beings around the world.

Honestly, that’s way better than having my data stored in US or Israel. The further away from home the better.

Pop open the lid, be right back to where you were. No amount of boot time optimizations will trump that.

"Anti western propaganda" means "dont show whats happening in Palestine and you'll be fine."

Israel has controlled the narrative on Meta and Google. TikTok is the only platform they couldn't control until now.

Yup, same thing here. Gonna try on my Mac soon. Will keep us updated.

It got leaked as a PR with an url to a magnet (torrent) afaik.

It’s a well known fact if you’re remotely interested in cars. Mazda has supposedly upped their game lately regarding rust, but they and other Japanese brands are still regarded inferior to Volvo/german cars in terms of falling apart to rust in our Nordic climate.

You can use car.info to if you want to dig further on this (statistik på skrotade bilar). Or just ask your favorite LLM. You don’t have to take my word for it.

Japan doesn’t salt their roads nearly as much as we do.

I assume you're referring to Länsförsäkringars list of most reliable cars (in terms of engine/mechanical fault).

While it's true that it's mainly asian/Japanese cars that are least reported, that doesn't make them the most reliable in general.

Mazdas and Toyotas tend to rust off in our nordic weather way faster than german brands or older Volvos. Sure, the engine might still run but what difference does it make if it's all become a piece of rust that is ready to fall apart within ten years.