HN user

clove

745 karma

Stock options trader using R for analysis.

Posts54
Comments173
View on HN
news.ycombinator.com 1y ago

Anyone remember that Buy.com commercial?

clove
4pts0
advances.massgeneral.org 2y ago

Genetic Factors May Substantially Account for Associations Between Screen Time

clove
1pts0
seekingalpha.com 3y ago

Apple Eyeing Manchester United Takeover: Daily Star

clove
2pts1
seekingalpha.com 3y ago

Yield curve inverts to its deepest level since 1982

clove
4pts0
seekingalpha.com 3y ago

Jeff Bezos says he’ll donate bulk of $124B fortune

clove
3pts0
seekingalpha.com 3y ago

U.S. Covid health emergency to stay in place

clove
2pts0
seekingalpha.com 3y ago

Meta Platforms exiting Portal, smartwatch hardware projects

clove
1pts0
seekingalpha.com 3y ago

AMC partners with Zoom to offer meeting rooms at select theatres

clove
1pts0
seekingalpha.com 3y ago

Airbnb shares fall despite Q3 beat, expects booking growth to moderate slightly

clove
1pts0
seekingalpha.com 3y ago

Musk closes $44B deal to take Twitter private, ending long, twisting journey

clove
7pts1
seekingalpha.com 3y ago

Alphabet dips 5% as Q3 revenues, profits miss forecast

clove
6pts4
seekingalpha.com 3y ago

Panic selling hits China and Hong Kong, with concerns about economic future

clove
2pts0
seekingalpha.com 3y ago

Zuckerberg kicks off Meta conference, shows off high-level $1,500 headset

clove
5pts0
seekingalpha.com 3y ago

Advanced Micro Devices sinks as Q3 sales miss estimates by wide margin

clove
2pts6
seekingalpha.com 3y ago

OPEC+ to cut production by two million barrels a day

clove
1pts0
seekingalpha.com 3y ago

Intel's Mobileye files for initial public offering

clove
2pts0
seekingalpha.com 3y ago

California sues Amazon over alleged anti-competitive pricing practices

clove
16pts0
seekingalpha.com 3y ago

Google to restrict travel to 'business critical' needs

clove
3pts1
seekingalpha.com 3y ago

Musk files amendments seeking delay of Twitter trial to November

clove
1pts0
seekingalpha.com 3y ago

S&P 500 slumps ~4% for the week as Fed's Powell affirms hawkish rate stance

clove
6pts1
seekingalpha.com 3y ago

Amazon investigating AWS outage in U.S. East region

clove
2pts0
seekingalpha.com 4y ago

Cathie Wood: ‘We believe the Fed has been making a mistake’

clove
4pts1
seekingalpha.com 4y ago

Boris Johnson to resign as UK prime minister

clove
6pts1
seekingalpha.com 4y ago

$5.00 per gallon gas has arrived nationwide

clove
3pts0
seekingalpha.com 4y ago

Meta Platforms engineering chief to exit that job

clove
3pts0
seekingalpha.com 4y ago

Biden to waive solar panel duties, eyes other tariff relief

clove
3pts0
www.cnbc.com 4y ago

Palantir Technologies CEO sees 20%-30% risk of nuclear war

clove
8pts3
seekingalpha.com 4y ago

Ray Dalio: We're headed into a period like the 1970s

clove
2pts0
seekingalpha.com 4y ago

Federal Reserve poised for first 50bp rate hike in 22 years: FOMC preview

clove
2pts0
seekingalpha.com 4y ago

AMD CEO Lisa Su says chipmaker has reached a 'significant inflection point'

clove
7pts8

I do like this comment, but I've gotten reprimanded for posting similar comments. It might have been dang that told me that for the purpose of keeping discussions serious, we should refrain from sarcastic posts. I've been posting and reading in that spirit ever since, and so when I first read your comment I assumed you were serious.

I'm not saying your wrong, and I'm not trying to be antagonistic, but when I read your comment, I uncontrollably began imagining I was reading one of those reader-submitted comments in a newspaper about the internet in the 90s. Again, I'm not saying you're wrong, but I was somehow teleported to a future in which AI is ever-present in the same way the net is now and trying to reconcile your viewpoint, which was impossible.

Of course, my hallucination does not dismiss the possibility that we are in a bubble. Wasn't CSCO something like 200x PE during the dot com bubble? People see immense potential in an idea but don't know how to properly price it, and so we get what is seen as essentially infinite expected growth priced into companies and their products.

My $3k laptop has nearly the best components on the market right now. The problem is that it has a poor build (MSI) and is falling apart in a way that's not repairable. I looked into purchasing an equivalent-or-better laptop, and I couldn't find anything under $6 for essentially the same specs, and over $10k for a significant upgrade. Though I need my laptop for work, I decided just to ride it out till it's death.

You've made the mistake of thinking that if IQ were 50% genetic (it isn't - it's way more than that, but that's beside the point), then the remaining proportion is completely (non-shared) environmental.

Researchers in this field actually break down the non-genetic component into four major components: 1. Shared environment 2. Non-shared environment 3. Error

Shared environment accounts for so little variance that it might as well be ignored; while non-shared accounts for little more than error.

Note that including error in the non-genetic component, just as you've done in your post above, you are viscerally downplaying the otherwise undeniably predictive link from genes to IQ. In other words, whatever number you give is automatically deflated due to the way a psychometric is measured.

This has never been the source of debate. Back when I was going through grad school in intelligence, people didn't have to overthink how they presented the data. Intelligence was already a mature field, and we discussed the data openly. But in the past couple decades or so, a lot of people such as yourself popped up, attempting to craft irrelevant, statistically incorrect arguments against the results of certain well-established psychometrics that happen to not fit within whatever mental world your brand of politics ascribes.

If you really cared about the data, you'd be discussing the numbers. But your interest in this previously niche topic isn't in understanding reality; it's in justifying your worldview, which is why you deny the established data, immediately present a caveat stating that the data doesn't matter in the first place, appeal to emotions, and finish it all off by claiming those who disagree with you have been brainwashed. None of those four arguments have any merit in a genuine discussion on this topic.

Now they don't have the option to be housewives unless they actively seek out a rich husband. Who benefits? (There is only one correct answer):

1. Families. 2. Women. 3. Corporations.

I'm Booking.com's Genius Level 3, so perhaps this only applies to frequent users, but I've been refunded in full for a booking after the date of the booking without even giving the reason for the refund request.

I've shifted 100% away from AirBnb and to Booking and am still able to book whole apartments/houses. It used to be AirBnb=houses/apts, Booking=hotels. Now Booking covers both, is usually cheaper (especially considering the cleaning fees AirBnb listings usually charge), and has good customer support (in my experience).

His point was that a tax on unrealized gains can one day be applied to less wealthy people.

I can explain it to you with a simple example:

Imagine, for instance, you're making 50k a year and have a brokerage account that has appreciated by 100k and that you're being taxed 20% on unrealized gains in year x. In year x+1, say your account falls back to where it was before. You paid 20k plus another 10k, and you will need to set aside another 10k. In essence, your income has been reduced to 10k, which could make daily life impossible for many people making 50k annually, especially those with families.

I've seen this type of writing a lot, and I agree with you: It's an excuse to draw attention to the writer.

Anecdotes aren't bad if they lead into something more substantive. E.g., "My experience with my kids in Greece got me interested in [concept], and here is the data that I collected; my conclusion is that..."

But no, it's usually like: Check out this experience I had or quirky thing I do. Now let's talk about something tangentially related.

It's really a need to vent being displayed most prominently. Maybe covid/social media/WFM/inflation/whatever you want to blame has made people lonely to the point of trying to add water cooler talk into their publications.

My ring - thus far - has been extremely correct about my sleep, as far as my wife and I can tell.

However, its activity recording is extremely inaccurate. I get moderate/low activity scores every day despite engaging in intensive weightlifting sessions, riding bicycles, and going to jujutsu class. I lift till I cannot lift; I roll until I gas out... yet my ring tells me, day after day, I need to be more active.

Brand yourself as "the first" or "the only" in a certain niche. I don't know anything about project management tools, so I cannot give you examples, but this is the method Dan Kennedy uses.

Focus on the niche market first and expand from there.