cloudedcordial

Curious to know about the pilot program!

I wonder what kind of vetting process the couple went through in the US as well. The story may over-simplify the process.

In Canada, my family knew a couple who tried to adopt a child in the decades ago because of infertility. The vetting process and the paperwork from the government agency was "audacious". They said the amount of red tape was so much to the point that the fertile couples would not adopt locally.

Back in the day, adopting a child from China and Romania was easier than adopting locally.

Plenty of adopted folks have been curious about birth parents as teens and adults. Not sure elsewhere around the world. In Canada, the adoption records used to be closed but have been gradually. There have been cases that the birth parents did not reply.

The car-dependent culture create a problem that you can't even go to work if you cannot afford a car.

Agree! The metric, even if it's an intelligent guess, justify why you did such tasks. It helps to bring a coherent story about your professional work. The tasks are not for vanity.

Yes, please ignore the cynical and negative folks. They are not doing you any good.

Like what a few other folks in this thread pointed out, your resume and your portfolio looks outdated and fragmented on my first glance. Most recruiters and hiring managers spend 5 seconds max during the first pass, so first impressions matter.

Here are the things you can do to bring your resume up-to-date: * "Key achievements" does not include numbers to describe impact. For example, "pre-screen and match thousands of patients a day" could be rewritten as "pre-screen n patients per day and match them to m healthcare provider with 99.99% uptime" sounds impactful. * Self-rating of your skills is not necessary. Nowadays your description of your impact is implicit on how you learn and work. In addition, "expert" for one person may not be the same for others.

On your portfolio: * Listing your education is no longer necessary after the first job. Putting this in your portfolio site makes you look inexperienced. (Leave education in the resume, however.) * The screenshots for Nike and LG look outdated, which contradicts "cutting-edge internet experiences".

Typically Americans have a very naive understanding of how the world works because American imperialism made it easy for them.

Do you have specifics on how Americans adults could be naive on the world?

I never put my real headshot on LinkedIn even before it was scrapped for AI training. LinkedIn still bugs me to put a picture to "increase engagement".

Putting headshot in resumes is not expected and even cringe in my country, but some countries expect headshots and other highly personal info. No thanks.

Startups are a terrible way to make money.

...for most people. Even if the company got sold or had an IPO, only the very early employees made life-changing money. There's no guarantee if the company will be at those stages.

The news bias towards people who made life-changing money, but does not tend to report the "invisible force".

On news: I'd say read from high-quality, responsible news sources. Lots of outlets create click bait, even if the stories are true, to direct readers to their sites.

Sumit B forever has a story to tell at dinner parties.

Username checks out haha!

I was in the area around 2010 working for someone else. Adding to your bullet points:

- The pool business near the single-digit RIM buildings had more business than they could do. Many folks wanted swimming pools at their homes.

- Various eateries such as the sandwich shop mentioned in the article made decent money during the height of Blackberry.

- People skipped starter homes and bought single houses as their first homes. Some real estate agents waited outside of some buildings during bonus was announced.

A local technical college has a dedicated course on "Slack at workplace" (or a paraphrase of the title).

Feature request: Enter company shut down dates.

I'd hate to show younger me current me.

I had the reverse. My younger self wanted to do something to benefit the humanity, but hated see the old me having no money and out-to-date skills (See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41716772). At the end of the days, the people at the top wanted the money. I didn't even have handcuffs, let alone golden ones.

There are jobs you like in this world, but you may not like the salary.

Word. So many people felt compelled to post and wrote meaningless gibberish on LinkedIn. See the subreddit r/LinkedInLunatics/.

Yes, but the fact that people don't respond to unsolicited door-knocking and pick up cold calls anymore prompt that I need social media as a way to stay in touch with others.

My Facebook account is only for the messenger and some local buy-and-sell groups.

My (private) Instagram account is for my friends.

My LinkedIn is for recruiters reaching out to me and contact my former managers for references. Former manager could've changed jobs so the old work email isn't any good anymore. A side effect is to research the companies and teams for my job interviews: Some recruiters did send me the LinkedIn profile of the interview panels.

Long lost friends and colleagues still have some way to contact me without knowing my phone and email. I don't have to proof myself through posting what I eat today and how excited about my work.

focus on power systems

Picking what you'll do specifically without starting the degree does not sit well with me. I am in CS and not in EE, but believe a degree gives you a breath understanding of the subject to let you choose wiser.

In my days, lots of students started CS because they would "like to put up websites" or "work for this specific employers in town". Those goals were determined based on what they could see around them at the time. Then the field shifted (like AI coming) and the company's trajectory shifted. They were disappointed on either the school didn't teach them skills specific to the job or didn't graduate before the downturn. The specific type of job or the field could also be saturated with folks with years of experience on their job: Entry-level positions could be hard to come by.

Definitely not. The opening was for some generalist-type openings.

I want to do something in my life that truly benefits humanity.

Please rethink your goals and how you will have impact. Unless you run a non-profit, people are in the business to make money. Let me tell you that I had the reverse experience earlier in my adulthood. I described a bit in a thread recently: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41598911

In my late teens and early 20s, I rejected big corps. I rejected standard job search and interview practices because people seemed fake. I wanted to stay away from making products that can do bad things (very broad!). I stayed away from business-y courses and topics because people with money seemed greedy. Fortunately, I found a workplace that satisfied my beliefs. I made an intern's salary in the area as a full time employee. Salary increase was almost non-existent. Work was very chill. I lived paycheque to paycheque and never travelled, but being poor was ok being in my 20s.

The last straw came when the company was sold. The early employees had a windfall. Some folks, who were in their 40s, retired or became an angel investor. Some kept their job and bought "adult toys" (Example: Classic cars). I got $0 because I had no stock. I turned 30. I had no money to replace even my personal computer and bought old parts to keep my computer going. That's my wake-up call.

I began to network and learned the reality of the industry. I learned to interview for jobs. I learned that a degree wasn't as valuable as my parents said in the 1980s. The company I ended with had some controversies, but there were a lot of smart folks who were eager to learn. There was no lacking of recruiters reaching out when and after working there. Start saving money in my 30s still wasn't too late!

If I had a sizable trust fund and just needed something to occupy my mind during the day, the non-evil-corp would be perfect.

OP here. I started out in a very niche small local software industry thinking they didn't do evil like the big corps did. The old guys who started the company were in great control. They just wanted to do the same stuff when they were new college grads (just minus the punch cards). Business growth was dead. Salary didn't even keep up with the inflation.

Then I took a QA position in a big corp after spending my 20s not saving any money. Even this manual/automated testing role qualified me for a 50% pay increase from the old job without salary negotiation. No dev shop took me after seeing I was clueless in recent tech stacks. After a few years, I was tired of the manual testing part and looked for a new job.

Then I had automation roles in a few local companies with increasing DevOps components. The companies are progressively less rigid so they are good in letting us exploring and using new tech stacks.

My belief in not doing "evil" in my 20s has hurt me financially and career-wise in the long term. I didn't read industry news before I turned 30. The QA job, even if the company had some controversies, was a savior to stop beating a dead horse.

AI will write the subreddit r/LinkedInLunatics content. It may be less cringey going forward.

You brought up a good point on this person deleted his podcast once he started working at a FAANG. When you worked for nobody, not many cared. A publicly traded company garners creates attention, whether malicious or not. It's safer to say nothing in public unless you are authorized to speak in a conference, to communicate with stockholders etc.

(If someone knows the URL of the podcast, they may still able to locate the podcast from Wayback machine. The episodes may not be completely gone, but they are way harder to find because such steps involves knowing you in the long term.)

You get to choose what games to play in life

Word. At one point in my post-secondary education career, I rebelled against being present online as a Computer Science major. I rejected LinkedIn. I met like-minded people at school and got my first job after dropping out of school.

One of my good friends never post anything online. He rejected the game of selling yourselves to the employers altogether. He thought the game was meaningless and the prospective employers should see through her talent without the game.

After a few years, I became discontent in my job. My network was only from the like-minded people offline. Some folks did the job for decades and didn't see any reason to change.

Eventually I chose to play the game: I joined in-person networking events, signed up a LinkedIn account and created a web development portfolio. I had good job leads and learned about the companies and the positions through the events and LinkedIn. Note that LinkedIn was only for professional purposes: I didn't broadcast my opinions via posts or comments but simply clicked "like" for the connections' new job announcements. I got jobs that paid 40% more than my old one which afforded me to get air conditioning at home finally.

My friend still lives in her parents' home and has no career prospects for almost 2 decades now.

Republican, middle-aged White women residing in three conservative states, Arizona, Florida, and Texas, which are focus points of contentious abortion and immigration battles. Their neighborhoods were poorly educated but relatively high in income. Supersharers’ massive volume did not seem automated but was rather generated through manual and persistent retweeting.

This kind of people existed for a long time. Before social media, I attended university with a few women who preached religious conservative ideals. The stories were so "off" that the campus chaplains pointed out that the stories (now called fake news) weren't charitable.

After graduation, they worked minimum-paid jobs for a few years, married, became homemakers and have 5+ children. They were super active on social media, so I thought, "Why do you have so much time on hand?" In addition, living in the conservative states must be so cheap or they were so wealthy that there's only one breadwinner in the household.

We aren't in touch anymore.

Facebook outages must be hard on them.

I just logged in with my 20 year old password. I see many contacts that I no longer keep in touch. Uh oh!

The desire to get free laundry throughout the years has not been changed over the decades, but those tricks weren't necessarily reported back to the vendors.

Now, more folks know how to get free laundry than ever!

FTP and CVS in 2008...Please remind us about this discussion in 2040!

Instead of putting money towards educating great cybersecurity professionals to overcome the bad actors, some folks want to get one tool banned. By the time ban comes in effect, I bet that there will be even more nifty tools than Flipper Zero.

The folks who suggested or agreed on this ban ignored how tech moves faster than law creation and enforcement.