capr

That analogy works for app code, it doesn't work for technologies, library, frameworks, algorithms. Why build a compiler for this app? YAGNI! makes no sense.

Yup, because perfect competition is fundamentally the same as the salary cap, except for companies instead of employees. Specialization leads to natural monopolies at company level just as it does at personal level. Besides, the term monopoly only makes sense when it's state-enforced. In a free market it loses meaning since every company has a monopoly on their exact product.

but that's not what they're doing. that's just you believing the rhetoric

so the doctors acted just like the LLM

That smells a lot like Facebook making a php compiler

He made an economic argument that went straight over your head.

I personally love how AI shows through sheer indifference how the whole concept of intellectual property is completely incoherent.

Do you disagree that this person followed the law, and that politicians enacted those laws, and that we voted for these politicians?

This is the definition of brainwashing. You had a false choice between person A and person B who are mostly the same some 4 years ago, and now _you_ are responsible for every stupid policy they enact.

I don't believe any of this.

"due to voters making bad choices" ahahahahahaha

way to prove his point

Maybe if they would've let their engineers use Borland C++ they would've learned a thing or two for their own product.

And that's about the only type of visa where that happens.

try it, like these people https://www.youtube.com/shorts/7iJDMU43iUk

But profit _is_ the driving force of human action. Doing anything voluntarily is by definition profitable, otherwise you wouldn't do it.

there's absolutely something wrong with the fruits of their labor though, which I am forced to use every day

not true at all, only socialists think that (I'm also from Europe where everybody and their dog's a socialist)

compared to what? most doctors never heard of Bayes rule

There are no core tenants of democracy other than majority rule. The actions you listed (with the exception of canceling elections) do not actually destroy the ability for the majority to rule. In fact, one common tactic of democratic states is to employ referendums for laws that infringe on the rights of a minority, thus shifting the moral blame onto the population when convenient.

How about this music chord formation program with a virtual six-string guitar fret that I wrote back in 1999? https://github.com/capr/chordclopedia

wrong: source-available means you can look but you can't incorporate/change/copy-paste/get-inspired-by. "look at this wheel, learn but don't make your own". It's a travesty.

maybe because forcing people or companies (property of people) is wrong?

"forced" to block... seems like the only ones who can use force is them

Ya, can't square the two? Check this out: violence actually works, so should we beat our kids?

As a Romanian, I find this comment funny. To think that Romania improved because of the EU, not because we got rid of communism in 1989 followed by a period of wild west capitalism years before even entering EU. Most EU money in here are wasted on corruption with infrastructure projects.

ah yes, the "everybody who doesn't agree with me must be brainwashed" cliche

"malicious compliance", an euphemism is straight out of 1984

So if you have a headache and you take an aspirin and the headache disappears you're going to conclude it's from the aspirin, right?

so the solution to incompetence is adding more complexity?

Developer value is totally user value. The developer "changes things and publish them faster" for the customer, it's not a hobby.