bmau5

Wouldn't it track that AI creative work would plummet ticket costs rather than increase them?

Would love to see someone vibecode an explorer for seeing how their jurisdiction spent their taxes. Denver has a decent explorer here: https://www.denvergov.org/transparency/checkbook#/home?year=...

If Flock can put them up, can I/my city just decide to put signs or lasers in front of the cameras?

It's more fun to whataboutism instead

PMF implies profitability. I could give away dollars for $0.80 and have unlimited demand but it doesn't mean I've found PMF.

You'll get a piece regardless if you're in index funds, as they're being strong-armed into buying at this awful price

Yep. I got a 16,000 word doc asking for 24 pictures for our ads

Valuations are always more of an art than a science but in what world is SpaceX worth more than Meta today? Maybe the $1.75T is to find that world.

It's easily abused by both sides of the debate because there's no strict widely accepted definition. I find it tiring because it's a largely inconsequential benchmark anyways (outside of Microsoft-OpenAI contract disputes).

The debate around "AGI" is the thing that gets me. People just moving goalposts and arbitrarily applying their own standards makes for a lot of wheel spinning

It's also valuable verifiable data for advertisers, in that it verifies real people are being served your ads, and it's going to the desired age range/appropriate audience

Latest pre-print from our team at Bristle. Let us know if you have any questions!

Feels like a great outcome for Brex. Mercury and Ramp seem to have been chipping away at their leadership position in recent years, so I wonder how their growth trajectory changed over that period.

assume it's the $1.2bn paid back to investors and then some divvying of the remaining amongst investors, founders, and common

Which tests did you have run?

As others have mentioned that data is captured in other studies and isn't the point of this paper

I'd understand if the ads were subsidizing the purchase price significantly, but this still seems to be in line with their highest pricing.

Thank you!

Thank you!

Does your estimate account for advancements in virtual simulation models that has simultaneously been happening? From people I speak to in the space (which I am very much not in) - they had mentioned these advancements have dramatically improved the rate of training and learning - though they also advised we're some ways off from showtime.

I can see the clear benefits of smart glasses, but can't imagine owning them myself (until there's a local only version). It feels like it will be a social faux pas as well, as I can't imagine being comfortable in a social setting around smart glasses wearers knowing they could be recording anything I'm saying/doing.

I may be the luddite here and I'm sure if they get enough adoption it will eventually be commonplace, but at the moment I'm struggling with this.

Post ragebaiting bearish article on AI to hackernews

Make front page

Which ads are these? My impression was they are all based on CPC or CP impression

I hear you. I just have a hard time believing he does anything without some direct tie back to his bank account. If we find he has short positions in Kenvue it'll make more sense to me.

Why they picked something that has extremely compelling evidence to the contrary, rather than just saying "ultraprocessed foods" or older parenting age is beyond me. I don't see how this serves their agenda, and clearly isn't grounded in any facts

which is the folinic acid, an active form of folate

Just finished this and I enjoyed it, though as you mention is very America-centric

It feels like such an easy win-win for Google to just add citations like Perplexity does. Gives credit + link to the original source material while still offering the improved experience they're after

The Great Leap Backwards continues

Yep definitely could be