Why make a recreational activity "risky" when it has zero reason to be?
HN user
TylerE
Email: me [at] tylere.net
To be fair in many cases the actual clothes aren't much better. I've had two pair of the same pants, same brand, same size fit noticeably differently.
It's not something for you to not like. Many of us that have visual deficiencies and have that setting turned on for a reason.
Was looking for this comment.
While I'm not really defending the markup of the commercial system, you're not so much paying for the system as you are paying to have someone to call when it breaks, ready spares inventory that can be overnighted, etc).
A little bit of leather isn't really gonna help much there either.
That sounds quite hazardous to anyone who happens to be epileptic.
Similarly, all apple varieties are propagated like this.
Apple cultivars are not genetic. If you plant seeds, you're going to get some random apples, which probably aren't very good. The cultivars are all produced via cuttings.
If you're more or less healthy they're fine. When things start to go sideways my experience is that they get out of their depth pretty quick.
Airlines killed passenger rail, not freight. Prior to it all being rolled into Amtrak virtually every railroad was losing money on passenger service.
No more than the government of France is the EU government.
Efficiency is never worthless in a world where resources (if nothing else, labor) are not infinite.
Survivorship bias in action.
The thing is, we're actually pretty crappy at knowing what we'll need 50 years from now, much less 500. Doesn't make sense to overbuild for an unknown future, when hundred years from now us will likely be able to do a far better job anyway.
I mean, Torvalds has called basically every person on earth an asshole at some point, hasn’t he? He’s the opposite of being sparing with critisicism, and frankly has historically often used his bully pulpit to do it.
A big one I’ve been seeing a lot lately is advertising annual subscriptions as monthly rates. It isn’t $12/month subscription if I have to pay $120 in a lump sum up front. The actual monthly rate is often basically double what they’re advertising.
Taken a look at the job market lately? Unless you’re like the top 1% (which most people aren’t), it’s extremely bleak.
To build? Sure.
To run? Absolutely not.
Feels like a distinction without a difference. What is any intelligence but a sum of its knowledge?
Um, how exactly does that even tangentially relate to my point?
Yeah, as a guitarist this is hideously non-standard. Definition of change for the sake of change.
There's no such thing as "Tab format". Tabs are just ascii text.
Not really. The lilypond format is extremely...complicated and obscure (and that's my polite take on it). Even simple stuff is quite complex. Very very far from Markdown's virtually WYSIWYG.
Not for physical mail.
It's not hypothetical. Xbox's margin last year was 3%.
What monopoly did they gift? IdTech hasn't been licensed to external companies in over 15 years, and several major versions ago.
The last non-Id release on IdTech was Brink in 2011.
Why not?
If you input $1000 into process A which returns $20, and inputing $1000 into process B returns $30, you'd be insane to invest in process A and not process B, right?
They are unprofitable though. Profit margins of the entire Xbox division are less than just sticking the money in the bond market.
Every ps4 game works on ps5.
We would be a hell of a lot better off with career politicians than the current batch of grifters and ex-Fox News chuckleheads.
No, he really isn’t.
Trump one had a sane (terrible, but sane) cabinet that largely controlled his wilder impulses.
This time he went for loyalty above all else.