Quitschquat

I'm a prolific vibe coder too, but I'm not going say I WROTE MY OWN Emacs for Commodore 64.

Don't worry, we're at the stage where we lobby the government for "regulations".

Has the be the product of an CEO's fever dream and a bunch of yes men.

A powershell-like objects-over-text UNIX shell in Lisp. I’m afraid it’s another agentic turd I produced, but I’m polishing this turd a lot more than the others.

Yeah, the crap I vibe coded is buggy as hell too. It takes a lot of tokens and time to polish my agentic turds.

I run Claude all day, and produced some good shit, but I'll admit to being thoroughly embarrassed that I haven't looked at it all, won't make it public, won't put my name on it, won't pick a license. I'm depressed about the whole thing and might take it up with a therapist.

My eyes are still rolling from GP's comment:

he single-handedly developed it by leveraging agentic coding

I think these kinds of ideas capture easily impressionable, elected representatives whose technical knowledge is non existent.

worktrees I suppose. That was a speedup when I learned about them.

I vibe code myself to sleep and implemented a rewrite of civ1 in Common Lisp. It works well, has all the DOS nostalgia I wanted (uses the same sprites etc.) 10/10 will continue doing this kind of shit.

This guy is just whinging he's behind.

Are new MBPs eliding the notch?

"I" code impressive shit with the LLM, but after the initial push to github, I find I hate myself and I'm deeply miserable with what it produced since it was not mine. My "ah-ha" moment has been that misery.

Recently started an embedded hardware/software job. Shipping firmware to the manufacturer feels like that for the device classes that have no internet.

I don't churn out code quickly enough

Curious what industry that is.

Even xterm on a sun sparcstation running openlook was sluggish at the time. cde made it hopeless.

I called this out back in 2023

People have been "calling this out" for decades. Yet the most productive languages are still dynamic/strongly typed.

You might be looking at these old Unix GUIs thinking they're shit compared to now, but actually, at the time, they were shit too.

Read the sections on nebula since this book predates the discovery of galaxies

What's PHM

I’m there for the T’n’A too

I wish my MBP M3 Max was snappy like that

Tbh, 15% faster than slow AF is still slow AF

At some point I could disassemble 8086 (16 bit x86/real mode) as a kid. Byte sequences like 31 C9 or 31 C0 were a sure way to know if a loop of some kind was being initialized. Even simple compilers at the time made the mov xx, 0 → xor xx, xx optimization.

Needs a section on Performance Stupidity. “The January 6 people where tourists taking a guided tour”

Second rule of Twitter is why are you on Twitter,

It was a short affair.

No longer on Twitter. I can't see how anyone would want to be. It's a veritable cesspool.

I usually discard studies with sample sizes of 1

I would like to filter via Smells Like Ass vs Smells Like Balls. I have a different tolerance for each

I don’t know what everyone gets out of Twitter/X. I signed up recently to see what the fuss is about,

I think I selected science and music as starting interests. Within 10 minutes I was getting lots of right wing borderline Nazi bullshit.

Tries it all again in incognito mode. Roughly same thing. WTF

Bro, you need to encounter someone barely surviving on SNAP out there. It will totally change your perspective.

Is this like setf in lisp?