OutOfHere

The fear is that the SVGmaxxing is limited to "X doing Y". If such 'template maxxing' exists, it will break for other templates, e.g. "X not doing Y", "X and Y doing Z", "X doing Y doing Z", etc.

Or biology or chemistry.

They forgot to compare and incorporate GPT-5.6-Sol.

Icariin too is a PDE5A inhibitor and a cGMP elevator.[1]

The antifungal drugs itraconazole and posaconazole directly have the downstream effect NPC1 inhibition followed by a reduction in lysosomal cholesterol accumulation.[2][3]

[1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17169663/

[2] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31919352/

[3] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40516874/

I did note $20-300. In particular, domestic employers would surely still spend the upper end of it for each of their engineer staff. If there are 4 million software developers in the US of any job title, and if the employer of each spends $200 per month for the developer, that's $800M per month in revenue.

AI and automation are creating plenty of wealth, just not for the worker :)

Over 900 commits from one person is significant effort!

Here is my feedback, more for users:

1. One should never run a crypto trading bot on Hetzner. Hetzner historically hasn't formally allowed anything to do with crypto. If it sees the words bitcoin or crypto anywhere on disk in a filename or in incoming packets, they can terminate your instance and account without warning, perhaps when you're in a middle of a high-priority trade that needs close attention. It happened to me, and is very dangerous with money on the line.

2. A second reason for not using Hetzner is that its datacenter is geographically probably pretty far from your broker, needlessly adding to much avoidable latency.

3. A third reason for not using Hetzner is that they recently raised the prices unpredictably and dramatically relative to other cloud providers. One needs a provider that won't screw oneself over.

4. If daytrading, it is critical to be able to redeploy and restart the trading bot within seconds. Until the bot's code is stabilized, identified bugs and strategy changes need to be addressed immediately when in the middle of trades. There is no time to rebuild and deploy a container. In contrast, it takes just a few seconds to do `git pull` and restart the Python/Go/TS service. As such, I would never use any container tooling for it. If one is making only long-term trades, then this matters less.

Who cares. Competition is good for the user even if it's built on plagiarism. The other site was probably designed using an LLM anyway. LLMs can in some aspects converge wrt their outputs.

American labs will do fine with monthly subscriptions costing $20-300/month. They will not do fine for heavy basic LLM API calls -- it is for this that the cheap API produces substantial savings. Specialized niche provisions, e.g. excellent tool use, reliable structured output, reliable long context, cached and uncached web search, document reads, computer use, integrations, etc. also will take time for the foreign services to be good at.

Which insurance firm was this?

Fwiw, if one has a passport and some funds, one can travel abroad for cheaper surgery abroad. It won't guarantee an outcome, but it ought to be better than delaying it. Of course this in no way excuses the insurance firm.

Let me do that for you. I think perfection is subjectively met at the end of one's consciousness about a problem. A higher being will see the problem more deeply, and its perfect solution could therefore be more perfect than that of a lesser being.

Imagine that one has to implement a function to multiply two large integers. A junior programmer will likely use the default multiplication operator. A mid-level programmer will add a couple of strategies with a weak heuristic for routing, and perhaps with basic caching. A senior will sample the incoming requests to identify which strategy might empirically be good, and ensure that it is being hit, with optimal fallbacks. A superintelligent AI might design custom kernels, and design a custom model for routing. A god will... we don't know what a god will do. Perfection, like beauty, is in the eyes of the beholder.

That is completely false. It is a reasonable type of question and a reasonable expectation. You can't route correctly if you can't do reasoning.

Imagine a prompt:

```

INSTRUCTION: You're a customer service agent that routes customer service requests.

CUSTOMER MESSAGE: I haven't received my order and want a refund.

CONTEXT: A signature is required at delivery. No one was available to sign.

You can route to one of:

* Billing & refunds

* Shipping & tracking

* Order cancelation

* Level II customer service

```

The dumb model, e.g. 1.7B, wrongly routes to Billing. The smart model, e.g. GPT-5.6-Medium, correctly routes to Shipping. It matters. In the real world, the CONTEXT will even be 10-100x larger and noisier.

I confirm I got an extremely detailed and long response for "Describe the process of pasteurization." with 1.7B. I had to tune nothing.

I run Bonsai-27B Q1_0 on my Android phone via the PocketPal app. It's slow but good. I wouldn't want to run fewer B. By any measure, my phone has less memory than my laptop browser.

Here is a short video explaining the paper: https://youtu.be/-WpIJhyAxr0

Yes. People can waive a trial altogether, even a trial by judge. It has to be done in front of a judge, and is limited to that trial for that person.

High bicarbonate in blood is not a blood disease, in the same way that high glucose in blood is not a blood disease either. High bicarbonate leads to severe and serious problems that can be fatal in those with weak lungs or a weak heart and in children and the elderly. Even in healthy persons, high bicarbonate will lead to low extracellular potassium which is immediately detrimental to the heart. I have experienced it first hand. There is a reason why bicarbonate in blood has a reference range.

It's not nonsense, and despite the repost, several readers still are seeing it for the first time.

The indoor carbon dioxide level is in principle contributing to it.

It is fatal to children as their underdeveloped lungs cannot compensate. For adults it requires emergency medical care and chronic treatment, failing which the heart won't survive long.

A sign of intelligence is to prevent "can/maybe/potentially" from becoming "actual", especially when the consequences are dire. A sign of unintelligence is to ignore the signs, then blame the ones who acted for needlessly averting the tragedy, claiming it would never have happened.

Constitutionally granted rights cannot be waived, no matter what a legal agreement says.

The Supreme Court has over multiple cases recognized that the collection of mass digital information can implicate Fourth Amendment protections.

Here is the foundational line:

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

It clearly says: The right of the people to to be secure in their persons and effects against unreasonable searches shall not be violated.

It is prohibited by the nation's Constitution which overrules all contained regions. The contained regions can add further restrictions, not lower them.

Mass surveillance is prohibited by the Constitution. The majority of the funds went toward it.

A core issue as I see it is that the police has too much money. Why are people willingly paying so much in taxes? Why don't people move to lower tax cities and counties? Granted, fines also contribute to their income.

There are ways of lowering crime that don't require police militarization, some of which are covered in https://youtu.be/YJTPGu2E4qk.

Everyone has an opinion, but what is their rate of successful predictions?

You've no idea what a review is going to be about. It is not this one review that concerns people - the concern is the broad policy and the pattern.

Also, have you actually seen health departments around the world? Have you actually tried complaining to them? They often are corrupt and do nothing! Even where they're not corrupt, they still don't take sufficient punitive action. And do you think someone actually needs to fall sick in the first place if it can be avoided via reviews? What you're smoking, you only know.

So you think it's okay for someone to fall sick eating bad food that the person could've learned about and avoided via reviews? Will you pay their hospital bill? A child or old person could even die from it. It is not nothing.

The poster is lucky he didn't have it any worse. After a trip abroad where I posted reviews, Google deleted all my Maps reviews, mostly those in the US, going back ten years, and permanently prohibited me from posting further reviews altogether.