since its flagged - gotta comment; I am not the author of the post. I was reading it in passing and thought it was interesting enough to submit. Indeeed did not paid enough attention as to how much "ai written" it was.
The actual migration, a day or less. Now there was a 2-week sprint for testing and validating backup and restore before doing the actual migration. At the non-engineering level (management and such) of course there was a review and consideration time as well.
So I guess this opens the question of which part really covers MLOps; I would love to see those but some strike me heavily as being part of the model development and training. I somewhat, in my simple mind always got stuck on the Ops in a “how to keep the system rolling” kind of way.
In a nutshell; no infra means infra but not managed by yourself; so you would focus on all the different ML pipeline in the journey (feature, training, inference) to create a real operationalised ML system.
Well, all good and nice, but we are so far behind on data infrastructure, development, and investment that I do not know how realistic it is to set those targets when the basics are not here.
I am absolutely convinced by the argument around the needs and such, much less about the imminent collapse, Fraud and unreliability of the digital ads is not new, it is not even a bug, it is a feature of the people who work in advertising; they oversell the capabilities because there is a lag between old and new guard in that field. Simply put, it is only but a decade old, and the people who taught and got taught did not know how to handle this new tool resulting in a big divide between expectations and reality that has hurt (justifiably) the whole industry and will continue to hurt. But this is it not enough in my opinion to call it over.
That is arguable, at best it is functional enough so that people can use it, at worst it is not functional for squat and it is mostly dominant because of the incubator attached to it.
In fact I wonder the rate of drop vs new user retention as it is hard to follow a thread, there is no clarity in the headline differentiations... it is really a tough argument to say that it lacks nothing and / or is a good example of function over design...
I did not realized that aesthetic was not correlated with function. Probably a clear visual understanding to the actual value of something is meaningless, I suppose.
I love that this gets some love.
I found it odd that the website is in itself not very pretty (like... that kind of goes against the main selling point of the community).
That is a bit disingenuous; it maybe has issues in syncing with folders or such, but honestly when you work directly in the drive for your document creation and sharing and co-authoring, its a breeze.
It is good for certain use cases, and bad for others, what a big surprise, now lets not generalize.
You are not wrong on the buzzword, but you are not absolutely right if you suggest that it is merely that; this is a recurring question and interrogation in that specific area.
The fact that it happens to be kinda buzz worthy is a collateral aspect: everything that answers what some people wonder and that is not yet answered plainly, is.
(and I mean, the first on the front page at this very second has : "We hacked apple" in the title.)