Your first premise is false. Hooking up your sensory system to a device that generates the maximum signal would give a larger signal since it would bypass degradation in your mouth.
Think your argument through first. Are your premises actually true?
HN user
Your first premise is false. Hooking up your sensory system to a device that generates the maximum signal would give a larger signal since it would bypass degradation in your mouth.
Think your argument through first. Are your premises actually true?
I am not aware of any claim that the devil is the largest evil that could be imagined. Further, such a definition would not make sense in for example traditional Christianity where evil is defined as a privation on good, not something that exists in itself.
Having God and the devil as evenly matched but opposite powers is not something you would find in theology. Learn the basics of it before thinking you have created a proper critique.
it's not 51% of the nodes, it's 51% of the hashing power together with following the agreed upon rules of the network
we do not have a workable definition of intelligence
Surprisingly no, they were not following science.
That's africa, not the west.
Do Buddhists hold this to be true?
Growing Bureaucracy
https://images.huffingtonpost.com/2015-12-08-1449597231-8924...
According to Buddhism, is there truth that a self can hold?
If it is in the publics best interest for the BBC to own the rights then that can be arranged
so those researchers can skip reading the article, the rest of us may like it
Rats have brains as well
you could try property dualism or hylomorphism or eliminative materialism
Trucking is the single largest job category in the US
We should invent something like that, 'radio', thing for computers
There is nothing magical about passing through a vagina to with life should start counting from then.
"Is there any example of something that isn't considered math but describes nature?"
- "The apple is red"
No math, describes nature.
how can we know that computers process information?
that's not technically, that's arbitrarily
Same with the field of medical/military visualization
It's not: 'citation needed' it's rather: 'research is unreliable and, one paper shows x, the next paper shows not-x'
offcourse not, retailers are very sensitive to matters of ethics like this.
The difference between a bullet made of real particles and one made of math is that the real one can kill you.
The middle one means "spimes take up space because they exist"
"there was nothing they could have done"
How about creating a better product worth paying for? Eclipse was and is not exactly universally well liked.
Causing the rape statistics to shoot through the roof is a bit of an impact.
völkisch means folk-like, meaning 'of the people/liked by the people'. The term predates, massively, any idea of race. In fact we have the same word in Swedish (folklig) and it has no politically incorrect air about it.