Joe's Own Editor 4.0 Released

https://sourceforge.net/p/joe-editor/mercurial/ci/default/tree/NEWS.md

by jhallenworld • 11 years ago

95 24 11 years ago

Tomte• 11 years ago

Full windows support? Yay!

joe was the first editor I used when I tried Linux for the first time. vim and Emacs seemed terrifying back then, and I needed very little features. Just being able to edit config files.

The Wordstar shortcuts somehow are still in my muscle memory. I will definitly try and see how joe fares under my current requirements for a text editor.

This is exciting!

cnvogel• 11 years ago

I can't believe how long muscle-memory can persist!

I started programming in DOS in the 90s, and just hitting Ctrl-H in joe makes my muscles remember the most-used chords... A very funny flashback.

NelsonMinar• 11 years ago

I haven't seen a live project on SourceForge in over a year.

FWIW, Homebrew is still at Joe 3.7. The 4.0 source release compiles fine on MacOS/Homebrew if you set LC_ALL=C to work around some sed problem.

BillyParadise• 11 years ago

I haven't seen joe for over a decade, got ya beat :)

jhallenworld• 11 years ago

I certainly thought about migrating, but not sure it's worth the trouble. SourceForge does have a fork-project button, but I've not tried it and all patch submissions have been in the form of conventional patch files. It sure would be nice if they came in as branches we can merge.

Hmm, I used autoconf from Ubuntu 14.04. Maybe there is an issue with it in MacOS.

mschuster91• 11 years ago

Thanks for writing joe. It's by far the best cli editor - simple to learn yet powerful once you learn all of the shortcuts.

visarga• 11 years ago

It's an honor to meet the author. I've been using joe since 2000. Still my preferred local editor. Thank you a lot for your hard work. :-)

keithpeter• 11 years ago

Debian Wheezy: just ./configure, make and sudo make install from within the source directory.

jamespo• 11 years ago

Love joe to quickly edit something (with jmacs alias).

At Uni we were brought up on JOVE (Jonathan's Own Version of Emacs).

diydsp• 11 years ago

Yes! Just in case anyone doesn't know, when you install joe, it adds a soft link to /usr/bin/jmacs. When you run 'jmacs', joe checks argv[0], and if it's jmacs, it binds all the functions to familar emacs commands.

This is very convenient, as joe/jmacs is about 1/16th the binary size of emacs.

There are also soft links to jpico and jstar and rjoe. jpico and jstar I assume run with bindings for pico and wordstar. I don't know what rjoe does.

reidrac• 11 years ago

That was the first editor I ever used in Linux back at the university. It was convenient because I had experience with Wordstar in DOS (3.0).

I stopped using it when I had to telnet frequently to a server to do some remote work (circa 1998) and the only editor that was installed was vi. As vi was everywhere and joe wasn't I just switched to vi (and eventually to vim).

I'm happy joe is still around :)

xsb• 11 years ago

I used it for a while before switching to Vim, than was like 8 or 9 years ago. I remember throwing DEADJOE files everywhere in my computer :)

supercoder• 11 years ago

I still use Joe as my main CLI editor, so this is great news.

toast02• 11 years ago

Thank you Joe! I've been using your editor since maybe 1996; it's the first thing I install on a new system. :)

nimz2• 11 years ago

Hmm, random question, did you work at Yahoo around 2005-08?

toast02• 11 years ago

Yes, I am who you think I am. I'm sure I wasn't the only one using joe there, though :p

chillingeffect• 11 years ago

Excellent. I use this all the time.

bri3d2• 11 years ago

My parents gave me a copy of Slackware Linux when I was a kid and it has shaped my editor choices every since.

I used Joe a lot, then Nano. Yes, Nano. I once had a (prominent?) figure in the startup community walk past my desk and tell me he'd fire me if I worked for him, because it couldn't be productive to work in an editor like that. To this day I think it's fine, although I've moved on to favor IDEs for static analysis friendly languages (Java, C#, and friends) and Sublime Text for everything else.

Anyway, thanks for Joe. It was instrumental in getting me into programming and I think I very well might have been scared off if I had to use Emacs or Vim to start. I just downloaded 4.0 and tried it out. Like others in the thread, it's come right back to me. I might switch for a while!

cgatesman• 11 years ago

Similar story for me. I pretty much started with joe on Slackware and later switched to jed as my main editor where I learned and wrote a lot of C and C++ through college. Of course there was always a sprinkle of vi in there for systems that just didn't have other options.

Earlier in my professional career, I resisted IDE's in favor of a customized nedit. I have since moved on to Eclipse, WebStorm and Sublime Text.

I do have fond memories of coding with joe and jed on VT terminals, though.

JoshTriplett• 11 years ago

I once had a (prominent?) figure in the startup community walk past my desk and tell me he'd fire me if I worked for him, because it couldn't be productive to work in an editor like that.

That was a truly awful thing for someone to say. We all go through learning phases, and making fun of someone for the technology they choose to use is just hateful, not to mention discouraging.

I originally learned on Solaris using pico (as part of a college "intro to UNIX" class), and I'm highly thankful for the person who sat next to me and suggested I check out Debian. I used nano when I first installed Linux, because nano-tiny was the default editor on Debian. I knew enough vi to hit :q! or ZZ if I somehow ended up in nvi. Much later, I learned Emacs, on the assumption that I needed to learn one of the big two programmer's editors, and I couldn't stand the modal nature of vim; to this day my .emacs enables CUA mode. Much later I learned vim, partly by way of shared screen sessions with a proficient vim user.

Or hey, if you really want to make fun of my past technology choices, I used to write VBA code 15 years ago, which in the snarking order of overly opinionated geeks probably puts me somewhere between PHP programmers and COBOL programmers. Some of that VBA code is still in use today, which is both an amusing and terrifying thought.

I've had a long and winding path to the current set of technologies I use. I'm sure many other people have similarly long and winding paths, and weren't always using the same set of technologies they do today. If anything, that provides a level of breadth.

(On occasion I've been known to snark at specific technologies, such as PHP or MySQL. That doesn't mean I'm going to make fun of people who use those technologies productively, especially when learning. There is a time for offering constructive suggestions about alternative technologies and the features and benefits of using them; certainly if someone seeks out advice for what to use then by all means recommend your preferred technologies and give reasons for those recommendations. But drive-by snarkage and belittling about someone's choice of editor? That's just wrong.)

bri3d2• 11 years ago

Yeah, I think/hope he was trying to be funny as it was a comment made in passing. He also had almost no connection to my employer, so it wasn't very scary.

It's stuck with me ever since, though, so it seems to have meant something.

Over the years thinking about it lent me the same perspective you have. I used to be one of those really annoying anti-X (PHP, MySQL, MongoDB, etc.) zealots. I thought it was funny but that experience made it clear to me that random snark can really hurt. Plenty of people use plenty of "joke" technologies to make real software people use every day, and snarking out on them is unlikely to help. I'll still steer people clear of MongoDB especially, but it's in more constructive ways and with a more clear eye towards actual use case.

dragonquest• 11 years ago

This is fantastic news! Joe is a great editor, thank you Joe Allen.

It has got just the right set of features to be a proper Unix editor that is good at editing and delegating other stuff to other utilities. I love the run shell in this buffer feature. The only thing I wish for is a soft-wrap feature, since I deal with long lines quite a lot.

JulianMorrison• 11 years ago

Of all the editors I've used, Joe does have a feature nothing else matches: the ability to edit really large files, seamlessly. Try opening two gigabytes of debug.log in Sublime or Vim, some time. And then go make a coffee. Joe would open that file instantly and be ready to go.

Syntax highlighting messes that up. But you can shut it off by editing the config files.

Joe's Own Editor 4.0 Released

Related Stories