US School Kids Are Doing Better Than Ever – But You Never Hear It

http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/nurtureshock/archive/2009/11/02/why-us-school-kids-are-doing-better-than-ever-but-you-never-hear-it.aspx

by pchristensen • 17 years ago

16 13 17 years ago

blog.newsweek.com

jamesbressi• 17 years ago

Finally someone shows the other side of the story about education in the U.S. -- not saying either is right, but always great to have balance.

Education and Climate are currently the two most abused topics facing our politics and society today.

mikedouglas• 17 years ago

While I think the constant pressure to reform is generally a positive force, to hear that AP placement in math and sciences is triple what it was a decade ago is a nice reminder of progress.

Alex3917• 17 years ago

Wow, this has to be just about the most blatant propaganda piece I've ever read. They somehow managed to avoid citing a single relevant fact or statistic, and yet claim that there is 'evidence' that our school system is largely succeeding. Reading this truly makes me feel like I'm from another planet or something.

edit: Let me just preempt this whole discussion by saying that anyone who claims that more people going through the system means that the system is of high quality is being incredibly intellectually dishonest.

scott_s2• 17 years ago

There is a correlation between people going through the system and people actually getting an education. If the opposite were true - less people were going through the system - I'd be very worried.

The problem with "high quality" is that I don't know how to measure it. If we can't measure it, then it's difficult to have a meaningful discussion about whether one thing is better than the other. That is, we're restricted to a purely qualitative discussion that's not based on evidence. Graduation and enrollment statistics don't measure quality, but I think they are a coarse indicator of where we are.

Zot95• 17 years ago

Your mileage may vary, but I know that in California, the curriculum has gotten a lot more ambitious. When I went to kindergarten, you learned the alphabet, how to count to 12, played with blocks and finger painted. When my son went to kindergarten, he knew how to read ("Dick and Jane" level text) and add and subtract single digit numbers. Granted, blocks and finger painting were gone, gone, gone, but kindergarten has gotten a lot more academic, at least in CA.

Periodic2• 17 years ago

Well, we need to make sure they're prepared for the standardized tests they'll get in first grade. If we can start them on reading early then we can score higher for our district and get some more money for our schools. If we let them spend their time finger-painting then we might get tagged as a deficient district!

feverishaaron• 17 years ago

A casual google search found this PDF which contradicts most of what this blog postulates, at least among the fastest growing racial groups. http://www.highereducation.org/reports/pa_decline/pa_decline...

scott_s2• 17 years ago

They're saying different things. The author's article looks at the US as a whole, and using the most recent statistics of enrollment, concludes that our school system is better now than it ever has been in the past.

The Higher Education paper uses current statistics on changing demographics in the country, and the number of workers in those demographics with a college degree, to project into the future. They predict that the educational gap between whites and minorities will increase.

These are not mutually exclusive conclusions.

dstorrs• 17 years ago

At the risk of sounding overly pedantic, I have a lot of trouble giving credence to an education-related blog article that averages roughly 1 spelling / grammar error per sentence in the first paragraph.

Periodic2• 17 years ago

It's interesting that this piece comes right after The Ph.D. Problem which was posted yesterday (http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=916850).

In that piece, the author points out how graduate studies have gotten longer and we are producing more graduates, but there are fewer positions and they are getting less non-academic experience. Essentially, more Ph.D.s is a problem in itself.

I'm not sure how that might translate to 4-year degrees though.

mattheww• 17 years ago

Newsweek also recently devoted its cover to shortening 4 year college programs to 3 years (http://www.newsweek.com/id/218183) and also asked a team of "experts" to discuss the idea (http://www.newsweek.com/id/218234).

Much like the blog post here, there was no discussion of the quality of education. No statistics about the quality, effectiveness, or usefulness were presented. The primary focus was cost and arguments about "development."

Unfortunately, discussions without supporting data seem to be the norm on this topic.

DanielStraight• 17 years ago

The US school system is more BS than ever. At the highschool closest to where I live, teachers are NOT ALLOWED to give a midterm grade lower than 60. The student can literally do nothing and get a 60 on the midterm. Then it only takes like a 75 on the second half of the class to pass. So overall, it's something like 37 percent of the points the student actually has to earn to pass. Even if 100% of kids passed that wouldn't be a sign of the kids doing well. It would be a sign of a stupid system.

char• 17 years ago

I think it is useless to argue (as in this article) that students are doing either better or worse in the American school systems now than in the past.

What is significant (and much more interesting) is the fact that compared to other rapidly advancing countries (e.g. India), our educational system is much less effective, and that this could have severe consequences for the US in the near future.

US School Kids Are Doing Better Than Ever – But You Never Hear It

Related Stories