Is_computer_on_fire() (2000)

http://everything2.com/title/is_computer_on_fire%2528%2529

by adamnemecek • 12 years ago

117 56 12 years ago

everything2.com

agildehaus• 12 years ago

Re-implemented in Haiku:

https://github.com/haiku/haiku/blob/master/src/system/libroo...

ComSubVie• 12 years ago

I would have expected something more creative than a static number.

mveety• 12 years ago

That's pretty much the behaviour on anything that isn't a BeBox. I had a program I wrote that used this on my BeBox and when I moved to 5 Pro on a Pentium it kept giving the same tempurature.

astine• 12 years ago

I dunno. I'm curious as to why they chose that particular number.

bobbyi_settv• 12 years ago

Patches welcome

ams6110• 12 years ago

I'd like to see the unit test for that one.

jesuslop• 12 years ago

Maybe one can try the HCF assembly extension as in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halt_and_Catch_Fire

digi_owl• 12 years ago

I guess it goes well with the old UNIX printer error.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lp0_on_fire

chiph2• 12 years ago

I was just thinking about BeOS the other day. If you recall, Be had fantastic multithreading, and could render multiple video streams at the same time. They even gave you a file on the distribution CD to test this capability:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jMFiRvxvrc

anon4• 12 years ago

I keep hearing about Be's mt capabilities, but I haven't read anything in detail. Can you point me to some materials that explain how it's different from e.g. Linux?

jimbosis• 12 years ago

I'm no expert, but you might find the BeBook, which "...details the Application Programming Interface (API) to the BeOS operating system," to be an informative starting point (though you won't find a comparison with Linux there). There are chapters on "Threads and Teams" in the two sections on the "Kernel Kit" (that's as far as I looked, maybe other parts of the book would be more informative).

https://www.haiku-os.org/legacy-docs/bebook/

dnautics• 12 years ago

Yeah... It's been years since I thought about this, but: for linux you basically have two options: fork() and pthreads. Fork creates a new process and IPC between the parent and daughter processes can be cumbersome - and it's not a terribly good system since if you're spawning a process to do a different task, the default state contains overhead of the old task. Pthreads gives you shared memory (and simple mutexes to protect critical data) but that's about it.

Beos' app model discouraged the use of fork() - but you could if you wanted to - and instead had a pthreads-like kernel level support for threads with some very nice C classes that handle message-passing and the like; interthread communication was baked in in too so you could have strong IPC without pipes. BeOS also came with a hybrid spinlock-semaphore mutex called the 'benaphore'.

There were some very excellent C++ wrappers for all of these too, the BLooper class was a by-default message handling loop (for example).

Finally, the threading model was pretty cool, it was a logarithmic stochastic time allocator with a range of "hard priorities" that would give you RT control (but could also freeze your machine if you had an infinite loop). Unfortunately the kernel had a tendency to thrash threads between CPUs in a multi-cpu setup. I think this was fixed in Haiku.

chiph2• 12 years ago

I never saw the internals, but from a coder's standpoint the thread switches were really fast, with low latency. Compared with Windows NT and OS/2, way faster on the same hardware. I don't have a comparison with Linux, as it was just getting started back then (IIRC, Slackware was the leading distro of the time)

Kiro• 12 years ago

Is ariels's critique valid? Is that best practice for functions returning a boolean?

What about applying the same logic to a function returning a number between X and Y?

  if (random_number_between(1, 10) > 5) {
    do_something();
  }

Is this correct? I would personally name such functions get_random_number_between instead but that violates this principle.

jschwartzi• 12 years ago

It matters less what the convention is than that there is a convention in your codebase and that it makes clear what the affirmative case is.

rab_oof2• 12 years ago

Yup. It's important to have functioning code that mere mortals can understand most easily. Because the code represents system behavior and people need unambiguous conventions to reduce misunderstanding and prevent introduction of errors along the way.

NickPollard3• 12 years ago

'best practice' is a difficult concept when it comes to naming things, which is one of the two hard problems of computer science.

However, I agree with ariel. In a functional-style program, or indeed in most programs, the important thing about a function is what it returns, not what it does. Calling a function 'getRandomNumber' describes the action of the function, not the return value, which is just 'randomNumber'. As your example shows, the logic in English flows much more naturally with the latter.

It's much better to talk about the box.size, rather than the box.getSize, for example. To me, the presence of 'get' in a function name is almost always a bad idea.

Similarly, I normally use the word 'as' rather than the word 'to' when naming conversion functions, e.g. list.asArray, rather than list.toArray

laumars3• 12 years ago

You make some valid points, but what about instances where you have a getter and a setter?

jimmaswell• 12 years ago

getX and setX are the standard Java conventions. If you're working in Java it's probably best to follow it.

nl• 12 years ago

naming things, which is one of the two hard problems of computer science.

To expand on this, the two hard things in computer science are:

  1) Naming Things
  
  2) Cache Invalidation
  
  3) Off-By-One Errors

kbart• 12 years ago

Personally, I don't agree with that because it makes things harder to read. I always use is_something (or isSomething, depending on the style used) form for functions that do some check and return a boolean value. It's really easy to notice such functions when reading code and understand their intend. Proposed computer_on_fire() is by far the worst example, the intention of such function is not clear by it's name and I would have to look it's definition/description to understand what it does. TL;DR using prefixes like is, set, get makes code much more readable.

EDIT: for your random number function I'd simply use get_random_number(x, y) too.

leakybucket• 12 years ago

As I recall, we used this for system call testing/timing. (I worked at Be.)

niklasni1• 12 years ago

You can't just say you worked at Be and not tell more stories! When were you there and what did you do? Why do you think you didn't take over the world? Have you tried Haiku?

mkramlich• 12 years ago

indeed. Be belongs to a list of companies that would be great to hear insider stories about. also NeXT, Thinking Machines, Symbolics (sp?), Infocom, Cray, etc

ComputerGuru• 12 years ago

Yes, as I understand it, is_computer_on and is_computer_on_fire were basically no-ops to benchmark kernel calls. One returns an integer and the other a double. But I could be very wrong, I have absolutely zero authoritative knowledge and this is simply an explanation I once heard that made sense to me.

code_duck• 12 years ago

'is_computer_on()' is an interesting corollary.

SapphireSun• 12 years ago

I guess it returns a falsy value (null) if the computer isn't on.

shultays• 12 years ago

It is undefined behaviour

Aardwolf• 12 years ago

The documentation is incomplete, it doesn't say whether it's in Kelvin or Celcius.

Intermernet• 12 years ago

Degrees Rankine.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rankine_scale

slm_HN• 12 years ago

This somehow reminds me of the show Halt and Catch Fire, which was one of the most god-awful shows I've ever watched. After Breaking Bad, Mad Men and The Walking Dead I expected a little more from AMC.

DrewRWx• 12 years ago

Yet somehow it was renewed for a second season. I can't wait!

bluedino• 12 years ago

What was Everything2 supposed to be? I remember it was almost like a Wikipedia thing that never really matured and it always seemed really slow. The Blockstackers guys from Slashdot built it, didn't they?

raldi• 12 years ago

I remember that the first Everything was at everything.blockstackers.com.

SwellJoe2• 12 years ago

Kind of a more loosely structured WikiPedia, with fewer rules and a lot more opinion. It's probably more comparable to the original wiki wiki web, by Ward Cunningham (c2.com, which contains a little bit of everything, kinda like everything2), though it evolved in different directions. It developed more focus on creative writing and commentary over the years, with less emphasis on encyclopedia style articles or technical articles, though I haven't paid attention to it in like a decade. I was very excited about it when it first came about, though.

It was closely related to Slashdot, but when Slashdot was sold, E2 remained independent.

chromatic2• 12 years ago

when Slashdot was sold, E2 remained independent.

Some of the profits of the Slashdot sale went to Blockstackers as an investment to develop E2. Unfortunately, the dot-com crash (and, to be fair, not enough effort spent marketing the software) meant there was little market for the underlying CMS.

jordigh• 12 years ago

What was Everything2 supposed to be?

Aw, man. The perennial question of that site. What was it supposed to be, really? Roughly, it was just about anything that you could express with basic HTML and pure text. No images, no videos. It was,

   * An online encyclopedia before Wikipedia
   * A meme central before 4chan
   * A social network before Facebook
   * A blogging platform before blogs

and several other things. About the only thing it wasn't was a news aggregator, because that was already covered by Slashdot by the same crowd. Its fashions changed with the ebb and flow of users and admins.

It was a sister site of Slashdot (at a time, Slashdot would link to everything2 articles in order to define terms), and also associated to sites like the defunct JavaJunkies and the somehow still living Perlmonks, which shared the Everything engine as a codebase. The idea was to monetise the engine like Wordpress and Drupal later did, but this never happened, and Blockstackers Intergalactic folded soon after that.

Somehow, Everything2 is still up.

reitoei• 12 years ago

A mixture of personal blogging, story telling, factual content, recipes, reviews, mixed in with a 'chat room', a voting system, and the ability to 'soft link' nodes to each other through titles (hard to explain). Back in the late 90's/early 00', there was nothing like it. It was an incredibly fun place to be.

Had a massive community at one stage, and an active IRL scene. Some of the meetups were crazy fun. Site is still going and the code is maintained to this day.

ungzd• 12 years ago

BTW, this site (everything2.com) suffers from some malicious ad script. If viewed from desktop, everything is ok, if viewed from android browser, it displays this: http://imgur.com/eWUjwHr (text means: "to view this site, UC browser is required", this message cannot be dismissed).

ASalazarMX• 12 years ago

Most likely your phone has unwanted software or your carrier is injecting ads. At least it seems clean on my Android using Chrome or Firefox.

jacalata• 12 years ago

I didn't see anything like that on my android phone in chrome.

SeanLuke2• 12 years ago

Better: the Newton had, as part of the NewtonScript language reference, a built-in "IsHalting" function which tested a function and determined if it would halt with a provided input.

See page 23-84 of:

http://manuals.info.apple.com/MANUALS/1000/MA1509/en_US/Newt...

scintill76• 12 years ago

Is this just a joke, or is the language and/or function actually limited such that a meaningful return value can be computed?

SeanLuke2• 12 years ago

NewtonScript is very much a Turing-complete language.

rab_oof2• 12 years ago

Styleshedding: bikeshedding on programming language style and declaring only a particular one true way is the only "universal correct" answer. (The tech equivalent of the Islamic State (because Godwins Law is deprecated since Nazis are now no longer the worst possible butchers to which to compare people.))

(Common sense from experience > style guides.)

Is_computer_on_fire() (2000)

Related Stories