The PayPal mafia

http://money.cnn.com/2007/11/13/magazines/fortune/paypal_mafia.fortune/index.htm

by bandris • 19 years ago

61 18 19 years ago

money.cnn.com

edw519• 19 years ago

Who knows, maybe in a few years: the Y Combinator mafia?

sharpshoot• 19 years ago

There sure will....

ereldon• 19 years ago

Which one of the YC partners will wear the thick gold chain currently on Reid Hoffman's neck?

http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/fortune/0711/gallery.pay...

pg• 19 years ago

Trevor, unquestionably.

kilik• 19 years ago

There were a lot of these industry insider, self-congratulatory articles floating around the media back in 1999. The only difference then was that the Sopranos was only in it's first season so it was not yet considered cool to do a photo shoot in which you posed as an organized crime figure.

GIVE ME A BREAK.

Articles like this make me think that the latest tech boom is already over. This is just a trailing indicator.

drubio• 19 years ago

This article also gave me an eery 'deja vu' feeling, even though PayPal is not a startup anymore.

I would also consider it a bad omen having it featured on CNN and Fortune.

marvin• 19 years ago

Well...some of them are creating very valuable, tangible services. SpaceX is an obvious candidate, Sequoia is obviously doing very valuable things, Tesla Motors are successful outside of the ephemeral social networking world...

I actually think it looks like these guys have incredible talents for creating value. Some of it could be foam, but most of it isn't.

garbowza• 19 years ago

Every similarity between today and the tech bubble does not necessarily indicate we're doomed for a bust. There are self-congratulatory articles in nearly every industry (economics, sports, politics, etc), but that doesn't mean you're on the tail end of a bubble.

wschroter• 19 years ago

All that ass kissing aside in the article, it really is amazing how many people blossomed from that one startup. It's cool to see people that make a ton of jack and yet are still very young and idealistic about the world. Thiel's singularity ideas may sound "off" in mainstream media but the fact that he can still manage the money and resources to support those ideas in a meaningful way is sweet.

byrneseyeview• 19 years ago

"Thiel and Levchin also wanted workaholics who were not MBAs, consultants, frat boys, or, God forbid, jocks."

It's a small sample, but the guy who wrote "The Paypal Wars" (http://www.amazon.com/PayPal-Wars-Battles-Media-Planet/dp/09...) was a consultant before getting hired by Paypal.

choward93• 19 years ago

'We can't hire the guy. Everyone I knew in college who liked to play hoops was an idiot.'

This rule still applies.

adrianwaj2• 19 years ago

Still don't know what 'hoops' are.. does that make me a genius?

dcurtis2• 19 years ago

Hula hoops, of course!

jimbokun• 19 years ago

Basketball.

adrianwaj2• 19 years ago

I'd say that the PayPal mafia have personal enemies - from those whose accounts they illegitimately cancelled, and resulted in sites like: http://www.paypalsucks.com/

ivankirigin• 19 years ago

Many big, often quality services inspire sites like that. It doesn't take much to be hated.

dcurtis2• 19 years ago

But PayPal's service was so horrible that I think some people called in bomb scares to the eBay offices.

Actually, I think this just happened again yesterday, but I don't know if it was attributed to PayPal.

plinkplonk• 19 years ago

From the cnn article

"Musk became CEO of the combined company and decided it was time for a technological overhaul. Specifically, he wanted to toss out Unix and put everything on a Microsoft platform.

That may sound innocent enough to laypeople but not to Unix zealots like Levchin and his team. A holy war ensued. Musk lost. The board fired him and brought back Thiel while Musk was on a flight to Australia for his first vacation in years."

In Founders At Work, Levchin says

                               " The guy who ran X.com became the CEO, and

I remained the CTO. He was really into Windows, and I was really into Unix.

So there was this bad blood for a while between the engineering teams. He was convinced that Windows was where it's at and that we have to switch to Windows, but the platform that we used was, I thought, built really well and I wanted to keep it. I wanted to stay on Unix.

     By summer 2000, it seemed like the Windows thing was going to happen because Peter was gone. He took a sabbatical to make sure there were no clashes between the CEOs.

So, this other guy was pushing me toward accepting that Windows was going to be the platform. I said, "Well, if this is really going to happen, I'm not going to be able to provide much value, because I don't really know anything about Windows. I went to a school that was all Unix all the time, and I spent all my life coding for Unix."

I had this intern that I hired before the merger, and we thought, "We built all these cool Unix projects, but it's kind of pointless now because they are going to scrap the platform. We might as well do something else." So he and I decided we were going to find ourselves fun projects. We did one kind of mean project

where we built a load tester package that would beat up on the Windows proto-type (the next version was going to be in Windows). We built a load tester that would test against the Unix platform and the new Windows one and show in beautiful graphs that the Windows version had 1 percent of the scalability of the Unix one. "Do you really want to do that?"

So it looks like what happened was a bit different from what the cnn article implies - that Musk was ousted because he had philosophical differences with Levchin. I doubt the idea of replacing unix with windows on a heavily server centric system was a "philosophical" mistake. Sounds like a typical PHB decision to me.

 levchin actually compared Windows vs Unix performance and even used "beautiful graphs".  :-)

The PayPal mafia

Related Stories