VirtualBox 3.0 Released

http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Downloads

by JshWright • 17 years ago

102 38 17 years ago

JshWright• 17 years ago

New features include guest SMP support, OpenGL 2.0, and experimental Direct3D 8/9 support (for windows guests, obviously...)

marcocampos• 17 years ago

Warning: Guest SMP only works if you have a cpu with Intel VT-x or AMD-V.

Damn, why did I buy a Pentium Dual-Core instead of a regular Core 2 Duo? :/

jdbeast002• 17 years ago

hope it means this bug is fixed now....

http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/2978

jdbeast002• 17 years ago

i tested it on my computer, it didn't seem to occur, yay!

sant0sk1• 17 years ago

I didn't know other HNers were such VirtualBox fans! I use it daily and love it. This release looks great.

jacquesm2• 17 years ago

I've just finished comparing virtualbox and vmware, and not of my own volition. I needed to compare a bunch of different file system solutions for clustering (see post elsewhere) and after working with vmware for several days finally gave up (vmware server 2.0), and tried the same under virtualbox. Virtualbox did the job quietly without fuss or license keys, where vmware was nothing but a pita and eventually refused to work.

The host os on the test machine is Ubuntu, the guest of was CentOs 4.7.

Bjoern2• 17 years ago

I can confirm this, had a similar experience. Though the VMWare Player is a nice piece of easy software for people who don't need all the features.

On a side note, did you ever install MS Windows iso with a system running on a CPU with SSE3 extension? Wuuuahhh thats fast :)

sp332• 17 years ago

This is why I'm happy that MS might be distributing Win7 on USB drives - install will finally take a reasonable amount of time.

gcv• 17 years ago

Have you (or anyone) compared VirtualBox to a desktop virtualization package, such as VMware Fusion? How does it stack up?

jacquesm2• 17 years ago

I've only used it for servers.

hyperbovine• 17 years ago

I have used VMWare Fusion for a couple of years now and have no complaints whatsoever. It's stable and not noticeably slower than using Boot Camp. USB pass-through and networking just work. You can even launch a Windows program directly from Finder. My one gripe--slow access times for the host-client file sharing interface--was fixed with 2.0.

I have never used any other VMWare product, or Virtual Box, but I thought I would add my $.02 since my experience seems to differ from most others here.

jsz0• 17 years ago

Since this thread is becoming a VMWare hate session I'll add my gripes:

-No native VMWare infrastructure client for Linux (or OSX) -Very limited hardware support for ESX -Stupid restrictions on the free version of ESX to up-sell. (ie, no jumbo frames on iSCSI?)

It's no surprise to me VMWare has completely squandered their lead in virtualization. The actual end user experience of VMWare products has gone steadily down while the free/OSS and commercial competition has raised the bar. I don't have any major problems with VMWare's products from a technical standpoint but I'm seeing less reason to use them and deal with a lot of arbitrary marketing/licensing restrictions that just ends up making my life harder.

Andys• 17 years ago

ESX isn't really comparable to VirtualBox, and is quite different to the other VMware products, so this isn't a particularly appropriate place to talk about it. But I must say that making a product like ESX have a free version as powerful as it is, is simply amazing and I am grateful for it.

Bjoern2• 17 years ago

3.0 Already? Wasn't just sometime ago 2.3 the newest?

While VirtualBox is really great I like OSE (OpenSourceEdition) better. Unfortunately if one needs e.g. usbhotplug then you have to use the commercial branch :/

Does anyone know when OSE will have that feature?

gaius3• 17 years ago

Probably when the developers are so rich they don't need money for food or rent.

jeduan• 17 years ago

Wont they be working at Oracle soon?

w1ntermute2• 17 years ago

Not to mention that there's nothing preventing a 3rd party from developing an open source patch implementing support for this very feature.

berntb2• 17 years ago

Excuse a newbie... is it worth trying Ubuntu on Mac with VirtualBox? What should I know?

(-: Please don't flame me. I might like ports as much as apt, if I knew it better. :-)

jodrellblank• 17 years ago

VirtualBox on the Mac is very nice. A respectably small download, an easy install, a pleasant GUI, it feels very polished and in my light use, both featureful and stable.

Yes, try it.

neilc• 17 years ago

Does anyone have any experience with how VirtualBox performance compares with VMWare?

papaf• 17 years ago

I recently made the change from Macports to Ubuntu on VirtualBox. Things are much nicer now. My one tip would be to have any datafiles separate (ie not read/write files on the Mac filesystem directly - even though you can) and communicate between the two "machines" using version control.

ZeroGravitas• 17 years ago

I think this is the way to go for everyone newbie or not. If you're not going to be deploying on OS X then why develop under it. VirtualBox with your deployment system on Mac OS X gives you the best of all possible worlds.

berntb2• 17 years ago

I work on Linux, Mac is a hobby.

It is a bit of a failure to go the virtual way, but I have too little background on (modern) bsd stuff.

jli• 17 years ago

but how is it for mac uses? it seems not as nice compared to parallels?

gaius3• 17 years ago

It's fine. I use it to run Solaris 10 and Windows XP on my MBP.

JeremyChase• 17 years ago

I ran VirtualBox on my MPB for nearly a year. It was a fantastic platform to run XP under for web development testing. It works very seamlessly.

deimos• 17 years ago

Works pretty well on 10.5.7 with WinXP SP3 as guest.

I couldn't install a firewall for testing (Comodo CIS, it'll hang WinXP on reboot) on the guest w/o VT-X/AMD-V off. I hope they fixed it in this new version.

pasbesoin• 17 years ago

At the moment, the page's "MD5 sum" link is not resolving.

http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/3.0.0/MD5SUMS

johng• 17 years ago

It's important if you install windows in a VM to install the "guest tools" with Virtual box.. it makes it 100x more responsive. Don't forget this step.

kirubakaran• 17 years ago

This is true even if the guest OS is something other than Windows. Automatic mouse capture is a very convenient.

fno• 17 years ago

I love VirtualBox so much. Thanks to Innotek for the free and open-source distribution. I do use the closed source version though.

If only they would support branching snapshopts. For example a main VM and then you could have one work tree and one webbrowsing tree. This would make using it for daily work even more appealing. Well, some day, I am sure.

scorpioxy• 17 years ago

I'd like to echo your wish. I also would like to have that feature.

I'd like to use when I am debugging a configuration issue on the OS with a certain application. Not a show-stopper by any means, but a would like to have.

sfphotoarts• 17 years ago

Did anyone get this to work on OSX? I installed it on my MBP, put Ubuntu 9.04 and it always locks up within a few minutes after booting, usually while its running the updater. Just wondered if others see this or its just me.

VirtualBox 3.0 Released

Related Stories