Assange brings 'instrument of war' case against Nobel Foundation

https://dailytelegraph.co.nz/news/assange-brings-instrument-of-war-case-against-nobel-foundation/

by SanjayMehta • 7 months ago

35 17 7 months ago

dailytelegraph.co.nz

dlahoda4• 7 months ago

I had a friend. 10 year ago he said that will meet NATO tanks with open hug. Years later, seems I got what he said. What is better, some death in short war or long tortures and years long killings of several generations in North korean style?

Our_Benefactors• 7 months ago

Years later, seems I got what he said

I don’t get it. Please explain?

dlahoda4• 7 months ago

i was living in the same country with him, but i did not get any political context back then. my brain was washed by propaganda of ussr, usa and eu, and in state general ignorance of well fed burgeosy.

now i see how bad things going to north korea scenario. so what is better to live 4 generations of people in north korea or few years of turbulence?

for person who was intrested all was clear 25 years ago, were country was going. from these, 20 years were pleasing dictator by world. after is not better (even after his is not pleased anymore).

bigbadfeline• 7 months ago

he will meet NATO tanks with open hug... I got what he said... better death in short war [than] long tortures.

That's the same argument suicidal maniacs use: "kill yourself now to avoid the problems of life" - otherwise known as the "silver lining of shit".

However, it's not clear why that should happen at the expense of NATO taxpayers, they are better off without maniac-serving wars.

Assange is the man though, sometimes I wonder if he's the only man in the West. Far too many don't seem to understand that sooner or later, the morbid obsession with wars is going to get back at them and bite their heads off.

dlahoda4• 7 months ago

nato taxpayer prefers paying for consequences of drugs smuggling, cyber warfare, terrorism and drones? bad regimes seems like to do that to nato countries.

orwin2• 7 months ago

Are you calling for a US invasion of Venezuela because it would be overall less violent, in an utilitarian point of view?

Because I don't think it can work. The last time it was tried, we got Libya. Militaries have too much power nowadays, you can't invade and do a regime change without death and suffering for years until you have a strong and local insurgent force on the ground that you trust will leave the power once the coup is done. And Venezuela's rebelsare weak, poorly organised, and very few.

dlahoda4• 7 months ago

i say i understand why somebody wants his own country to be invaded.

and what you say about balkas invaded? was it good or not? some of countries here are better now.

50 years of suffering vs few years of violent turbulence. what is better?

IAmBroom• 7 months ago

Regardless of whether he's right or not on this particular case... Assange is a mentally imbalanced fame-seeker, and likely a rapist to boot.

Don't care about him anymore.

taproottap2• 7 months ago

Right, better to take the other side where anyone who appears to be a fame seeker who raped his wife couldn't plausibly have been setup by a standard CIA maneuver.

FireBeyond• 7 months ago

You can say what you like about the competency of our intelligence community, but I think if they were setting him up they might have come up with something slightly more damning than "might have taken a condom off once or twice".

intothemild2• 7 months ago

He contacted the Swedish police... For the Nobel Peace Prize.

Which is in Norway.

He's a clown.

_aavaa_• 7 months ago

From the article: “ submitted to Sweden’s Economic Crime Authority and War Crimes Unit, where the Nobel Foundation is based”

SanjayMehta• 7 months ago

The Nobel Foundation is in Sweden.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Nobel-Foundation

intothemild2• 7 months ago

Yes, but she won the Nobel Peace Prize.

Assange brings 'instrument of war' case against Nobel Foundation

Related Stories